Biofuels: The Next Threat to Forests?

Biofuels: The Next Threat to Forests?

4 May 2007

published by Conservation International

One thing is for certain: Biofuels are generating enormous buzz. Government and business leaders worldwide are touting agricultural crops as sources ofenergy that are more climate-friendly than fossil fuels. But just how environmentally friendly is it to convert natural resources like sugarcane, corn, and palm oil into fuel?

Today, as the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) releases a report to address how we can reduce heat-trapping gas emissions, experts atConservation International (CI) are intent on making sure biofuels benefit the global climate, human welfare, and biodiversity alike.

Biofuels may have the potential to fuel our cars, heat our homes, and generate electricity in a cleaner manner than fossil fuels, but there is adownside. According to CI experts, the practice of clearing land to grow crops for biofuels poses a looming threat to the world’s biologically richforests, peatlands, grasslands, and wetlands. Burning and clearing intact ecosystems to make way for sugar cane and other crops that can be convertedinto fuel could destroy the very habitats that store nearly a quarter of the world’s carbon – a natural means of tempering climate change. In otherwords, the solution could be more destructive than the problem.

“Biofuels probably are the largest single threat to the conservation of the tropical forests across the world,” says Tim Killeen, senior researchfellow in CI’s Center for Applied Biodiversity Science.

Biofuels Production in Brazil

Producing biofuels on natural forests and grasslands is tempting for investors. Natural habitats are often less expensive than cleared land.
With no clear owner, government-controlled land in remote areas is therefore often obtained for free simply by occupying it. It is alsofrequently easier to obtain one large forested region rather than piecing together many small land holdings for production.

Already a world leader in producing biofuels, Brazil is grappling with thattemptation. Brazil’s favorable climate for year-round growing enables the country to produce far more sugar cane-based ethanol – a biofuel substitutefor gasoline – than American farmers achieve from corn yields. Brazil is also successfully reducing the need for chemical fertilizers whileimproving yields. The country mitigates more than 40 percent of total emissions in its transportation system by producing more than 3.7 billiongallons of ethanol from sugar cane to displace oil.

Though seemingly good news in the face of globally rising greenhouse gasemissions, ballooning demand for biofuels is compelling Brazil to rev upproduction. To do so, the country could be tempted to rely more heavily on regions that conservationists have been vigorously working to protect fromdeforestation: the Cerrado, the Pantanal, and the Brazilian Amazon. The Amazon is the world’s largest tropical rain forest and home to the mostabundant biodiversity on the planet.

In the short term, expanding Brazil’s sugar cane production will likely rely on converting existing pastures to sugar cane, which could displacecattle production into the Amazon. In the longer term, “if commodity prices remain high, you can expect more sugar mills to be built in more remoteareas and the agricultural frontier will expand,” Killeen says.

Brazil is also expanding other types of energy feedstocks like those derived from soy and African oil palms. While ethanol replacesgasoline, vegetable oils like African palm oil and soy will displace diesel. Biofuelsmade from palm oil may hold promise for small land holders, but their production is already contributing to destruction of tropical rain forestsin Indonesia and Malaysia.

Better Biofuels Solutions

To avoid deforestation and safeguard human welfare, CI’s climate team is advising governments and companies with interests in pursuing biofuels toensure that we don’t degrade lands or trade one environmental problem foranother.

Michael Totten, chief advisor of climate and water initiatives for CI’s Center for Environmental Leadership in Business (CELB), says using landalready deforested, degraded, or abandoned rather than clearing more trees would prevent people from removing or convertingexisting, intact ecosystems. He says those are fundamental standards for acceptable biofuelsproduction.

“Our challenge is to make sure that they use already cleared lands, whetherthey’re abandoned or otherwise, both to avoid deforestation and to make sure they don’t indirectly contribute to deforestation by displacing whatwas already on that land,” says John Buchanan, CELB’s senior director of business practices.

Conservationists can also provide leaders with detailed information about a region’s biodiversity value to help them understand where it would be leastdamaging to expand biofuel plantations. Totten says companies and governments could further curb the negative ecological impacts of biofuelsproduction by offsetting their actions with funding to protect key biodiversity areas.

Above all, it is crucial to simultaneously pursue other lower cost and lower risk solutions to global fuel challenges. Among those is a large poolof energy-efficiency options to displace oil, and emerging electricity-based options like plug-in hybrid electric vehicles powered bywind and solar resources.

Print Friendly, PDF & Email
WP-Backgrounds Lite by InoPlugs Web Design and Juwelier Schönmann 1010 Wien