Three Game-Changing Approaches to Wildfire Response

Three Game-Changing Approaches to Wildfire Response

23 August 2018

Published by

USA – Whether you’re working at incident command in fire camp or at your desk planning a workshop, I want to draw your attention to three amazing blogs related to wildfire response that we published this year. (Just in case you’ve missed a post … or two … recently.)

Co-Managing Wildfire: Conversations You Need to Have Right Now

Why is managing a wildfire that crosses multiple property lines so difficult? And how can we manage those fires better? In their blog, wildfire researchers Dr. Branda Nowell, Dr. Anne-Lise Velez and Dr. Toddi Steelman share some of their 2017 research, with an eye toward how wildfire managers can get ahead of potential cross-jurisdictional conflict. They outline the three conversations that they think are most important to have before the wildfire arrives, as well as some of the nuances that make collaboration during a wildfire only as strong as the trust and communication that is established beforehand.

Three triangles (labelled, "Share the decision space," "Create greater alignment of objectives," and "Reduce jurisdictional interdependence," surrounding a fourth inner-triangle labelled, "Points of leverage to reduce/resolve tension on multijurisdictional fires."
Nowell et. al’s research on the 2017 wildfire season identified three points of leverage that can potentially reduce or resolve tension during multi-jurisdictional wildfires, each of which are shown in an orange triangle above. You can imagine that as one or more of the orange triangles changes, the green triangle fluctuates accordingly. Read their recommendations on how to reduce conflict during wildfire response by clicking on the image above. Credit: Dr. Branda Nowell, Fire Chasers Research Program

Collaborative Spatial Fire Management: Getting Ahead of Fire Using Potential Operational Delineations

When wildfire managers decide what actions to take, what information do they normally have access to? What might they be missing? How will impacted communities react to the decisions they make? What if there was a way to integrate stakeholder values and landscape characteristics spatially (i.e., on a map) beforehand? In his blog, Mike Caggiano outlines how his research group at the Rocky Mountain Research Station is piloting a new approach to facilitating transparent decisions, allowing good fire to burn under the right conditions, and informing suppression strategies when needed.

Map with hand-drawn polygons and post-it notes on it

Developing boundaries (before a wildfire) that consider control features in relation to topography, timber, wildlife habitat and critical water infrastructure can help wildfire response teams make more informed management decisions. Click on the image above to learn more. Credit: Mike Caggiano, Colorado Forest Restoration Institute, Colorado State University

Fire Adapted Communities on the Range: Why Rangeland Fire Protection Associations Matter

There’s a new model for wildfire response emerging in the West, and it’s allowing ranchers to participate in wildfire suppression early on. This model, known as Rangeland Fire Protection Associations (RFPAs), creates structure and support for ranchers to participate in wildfire response when the start is near their property. Does your state have the right ingredients to cook up something similar? Dr. Emily Jane “EJ” Davis shares insights into her RFPA research, as well as a link to a storymap to learn more in this early-summer post.

Radio inside a truck

The support that Rangeland Fire Protection Associations receive varies. If equipped with basic equipment like radios, wildfire response becomes all the more efficient. Click on the image above to learn more about Rangeland Fire Protection Associations. Credit: Dr. EJ Davis, Oregon State University


Print Friendly, PDF & Email
WP-Backgrounds Lite by InoPlugs Web Design and Juwelier Schönmann 1010 Wien