USA U.S. Senator Steve Daines this week pressed the U.S. Forest Service for answers on their recent decision to reduce the number of Type 1 helicopters. According to a release from the Forest Service, the number will be reduced to 34.
In a letter to U.S. Forest Service Chief Tom Tidwell, Daines questioned Tidwells decision both from a cost-saving perspective and being best equipped to handle fire season.
I am concerned that these resources may not be available when most needed and may increase costs, Daines wrote. As such, I respectfully request a cost comparison for the non-renewed helicopters and equivalent call-when-needed helicopters and an analysis of the Services decision-making in terminating the six helicopter contracts and whether the Service obtained the input of its agency partners or its own regional fire managers prior to this decision.
Type 1 helicopters are employed to fight difficult fires, carrying up to 700 gallons of water and up to 15 passengers. They’re one of three helicopters used to fight wildland fires. During Montana’s Roaring Lion Fire in August of 2016, Type 1 incident teams (along with Type 2) responded.
A spokesperson for the U.S. Forest Service told FireAviation.com that the appropriate number of Type 1 helicopters to have is 28 and that this is inline with the 2012 Airtanker Modernization Strategy.
Daines letter is available to download HERE or you can read it below:
Dear Chief Tidwell:
I respectfully request your personal attention to a recent decision by the U.S. Forest Service (the Service) to reduce the number of Type 1 helicopters under national exclusive use contract for 2017 and urge the Service to reconsider this decision. It is my understanding that the decision would cancel contracts for the helicopters based in Helena and Hamilton, Montana, as well as four other Type 1 helicopters across the West. While I believe it is important to find areas of cost savings, I am concerned this decision risks protecting our forests and those living nearby from wildfire.
As I remain supportive of the Wildfire Disaster Funding Act, ensuring Montana wildland firefighters are equipped with sufficient resources to protect our communities and our forests has been one of my top priorities. However, in recent years, the Service has continued to reduce resources serving our state, including reductions to NextGen airtanker contracts and the transfer of the Modular Airborne Fire Fighting Systems mission to Reno instead of Great Falls. Through the years, I fought to protect these federal resources for our state just as I fought to allow Montana UH1H helicopters to help fight Montana wildfires in an emergency. Unfortunately, this recent decision may reduce our states resources yet again.
It is critical to analyze any cost savings in relation to the increased expense and availability of call-when-needed helicopters. I understand that the air tanker fleet has not increased since the 2016 fire season, and therefore, would like to know how the planned reduction in exclusive-use Type 1 helicopters will affect the agencys overall firefighting capabilities. While I anticipate that the Forest Service may plan to rely on call-when-needed helicopters in the absence of these exclusive-use helicopters, I am concerned that these resources may not be available when most needed and may increase costs. As such, I respectfully request a cost comparison for the non-renewed helicopters and equivalent call-when-needed helicopters, an analysis of the Services decision-making in terminating the six helicopter contracts and whether the Service obtained the input of its agency partners or its own regional fire managers prior to this decision.
While I respect the hard work of agency fire managers and all efforts to spend taxpayer dollars efficiently, I want to ensure our states firefighting needs will be met as we near the 2017 wildfire season. Thank you for your service to our nation and I look forward to prompt response.