Osprey becoming final line of fire fighting defence

Osprey becoming final line of fire fighting defence

24 March 2016

published by http://fireandrescue.co

USA– Cal Fire is welcoming the addition of a new fire fighting tool, the MV-22 Osprey aircraft, whose rotors allow it to take off like a helicopter, eliminating the need for a runway and flies like an airplane. However, this last-resort, water-dropping aircraft has some noteworthy limitations. Still, a demonstration of the Osprey’s water-dropping capabilities at Hemet-Ryan Airport in February 2016 impressed Cal Fire officials and the marines and it will become available to Cal Fire to fight wildfires starting in May 2016, said Travis Alexander, Cal Fire division chief for tactical air operations. The MV-22 will be able to respond from Marine Corps Air Station Miramar and Camp Pendleton within 24 hours to fires in Cal Fire’s San Diego Unit. Requests for the Osprey to fight fires in the Inland Empire and elsewhere must go through the Department of Defence and could take 96 hours to be approved. The aircraft would be called in only when all other Cal Fire resources are tapped out and flames are threatening lives or high-value places such as hospitals, roads or water-treatment plants, Alexander said.

“I couldn’t be happier that California and the Marine Corps are working together to apply this new piece of technology now rather than later,” said Craig Hooper, who has advocated adapting the Osprey for fire fighting use on his maritime blog, NextNavy.com. Hooper also researches security issues for a private consulting firm, Gryphon Scientific and is a frequent commentator on defence and homeland security affairs. Cal Fire’s use of military aircraft is not new. Many of its airplanes and helicopters are adapted from military designs for civilian use or are former military aircraft themselves. In addition to the Osprey, which went into service in 2007, the military can send the Sikorsky CH-53E Super Stallion to fires. That helicopter can lift 16 tons for 80 kilometres and be used to drop water from a bucket.

Military, Cal fire confident

At the 11 February 2016 demonstration in Hemet, members of the Marine Medium Tiltrotor Squadron 165 hooked a bucket capable of carrying 2498 litres of water to a 30-metre tether. After the bucket was filled at Diamond Valley Lake, the pilot made two dry runs, flying the aircraft around the drop area, before making four runs where he dumped water on the targets.

“Today’s evolution answered all the questions for Cal Fire,” George Shinrock, programme manager for Fire Emergency Services Marine Corps Installations West, said in a marines news release. “If the need arises and they request our assistance, we’re very confident the MV-22B will perform the mission with great success.”

Cal Fire wanted to see whether the Osprey could accurately drop water despite the wind, or downwash, generated by its rotors. “The use of the 30-metre-long line with a minimum distance of 21 metres from the bottom of the bucket was sufficient to mitigate any downwash,” Alexander said. Therein lays one of the issues in using the Osprey to fight fires.

High winds, heat

The Osprey’s top speed is more than 483 kilometres per hour, as fast as Cal Fire’s S-2T retardant-dropping airplanes, and it can carry four crew members and 24 troops. In comparison, Cal Fire Super Huey helicopters can travel 201 kilometres per hour and carry a pilot and 10 passengers. The Osprey’s 2498-litre bucket holds twice the water as the Super Huey.

“If I can get there twice as fast and carry twice as many resources, I think that could be a good use of resources,” Hooper said in an interview.

“Powerful rotor wash from the Osprey’s two Rolls-Royce engines is far stronger than the wash from conventional helicopters,” Hooper wrote on his blog in 2011. “During a water drop, all the extra downward-shooting air can fuel the forest fire and do far more harm than good.”

Hooper also noted the Osprey’s engines run so hot that the Navy had to have pilots rotate their engines so the exhaust wouldn’t blow in one direction and melt a ship’s flight deck.

That heat, Cal Fire’s Alexander said, makes the Osprey impractical for transporting fire fighters and equipment when it would have to land in forest areas.

“There is no perfect platform (fire fighting aircraft),” he said. “They all come with their pluses and minuses.”

Yet Hooper urged Cal Fire not to give up on the Osprey as a transport aircraft, saying noting the Osprey will be based in California for decades. “Let’s try to overcome these operational challenges so this Marine Corps asset can help in a disaster,” he wrote.

Future of fire fighting?

Hooper said he’d like to see more military technology adapted for fire fighting use, including:
•The Navy’s surveillance unmanned aerial vehicle, a drone called the Global Hawk. It can stay aloft for long periods of time and has sensors that can quickly transmit needed data to fire fighters.

•A Lockheed Martin unmanned helicopter known as the K-MAX. It can deliver cargo, detect hotspots and drop water from a bucket.

“These assets help you sense what’s going on and help you get information to where it’s needed quickly so you can act upon it and by acting prevent the disaster from happening,” Hooper said. “That’s a big thrust of interest in the military and it would be neat to take that development thrust and apply it to here at home. However, it is hard for first responders to get a chance to access these new capabilities until after a disaster has already gotten out of hand.

“The challenge for Cal Fire is to figure out how to use these platforms,” he said.
 Cities and tourist areas such as Catalonia, Madrid and Valencia are among those most at risk of catastrophic damage from wildfires in Europe, according to research led by the University of Leicester.

An international research team has put together a map using satellite data that details the countries in Europe with the highest likelihood of experiencing wildfire damage – with large fires occurring more frequently near WUI areas in the countries of Albania, Bulgaria, Cyprus, France, Italy and Spain.

The map is published in theJournal of Environmental Management and is the first European-scale map of wildland/urban areas.

For the first time, the researchers set out to map the extent of wildland areas around cities all over Europe to find out where they create a risk for large wildfires threatening people.

Using satellite maps of land cover and of the extent of large fires, they used statistics to find areas where large fires have happened more frequently and where wildland areas are close enough to cities to make them vulnerable.

The distance from the nearest wildland/urban areas explained the occurrence of large fires in many regions across Southern Europe, where fires are the biggest problem.

Professor Heiko Balzter, Director of the Centre for Landscape and Climate Research at the University of Leicester, said: “In the regions we have identified as high-risk, local authorities need to prioritise fire risk control and develop better forest fire risk management strategies.

Wildfire map reveals countries in Europe most at risk of catastrophic fire damage

“This study was exciting, especially when we had our Eureka moment as it became clear that were onto something. We did not know what to expect when we started this work. To map the extent of wildland/urban areas all across Europe was already quite new. But to find that we can use that map to predict fire risk was a real breakthrough.”

The overall study area covered the entire European Union, including the non-member states of Switzerland, Norway, Iceland, Montenegro, the Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia, Turkey, Bosnia and Herzegovina Kosovo.

WUI mapping and the cross-national scale statistical analysis between WUI distance and large forest fires were performed for the whole study area.

Amongst the included countries, forest fires are strongly concentrated in the Mediterranean countries.

Dr Beth Cole from the University of Leicester’s Centre for Landscape and Climate Research, a co-author of the study, added: “A European wide approach to mapping the interface of wildland and urban areas has really allowed us to see the relationship between land cover and fire risk at a continental scale. This opens up a great opportunity for to reduce the risk of costly and dangerous wildfires in these populated areas.”


In many regions of Europe the rapid changes in the global economy have led to dramatic changes in land use.

Many farmers have given up production and shrubs encroach on abandoned land and these changes have altered the landscapes around many large cities, particularly in the Mediterranean.

Where such wildland areas meet the city boundaries, wildfires are a serious risk. This is especially the case in Southern Europe where summers can be hot and dry.

Such conditions lead to sometimes catastrophic wildfires resulting in the loss of human lives and damage to property.

Wildland areas around cities are landscapes where urban land use makes people and properties very vulnerable to disasters and at the same time woody plants act as fuel for massive fires.

With the recent extreme weather in Europe such fires have been called ‘mega-fires’ by researchers.

They can be self-fanning, some have fire tornadoes throwing embers high up into the air and spreading themselves across vast landscape very quickly. They are notoriously difficult to extinguish and are feared by many fire-fighters.

The study, which is supported by the Natural Environment Research Council (NERC), was carried out by the University of Leicester’s Centre for Landscape and Climate Research and National Centre for Earth Observation, the University of Cassino and Southern Lazio, and the European Commission’s Joint Research Centre in Ispra, both in Italy.

Dr Sirio Modugno, researcher from the University of Cassino and Southern Lazio, lead author of the study and an Honorary Visiting Fellow at the Centre for Landscape and Climate Research of the University of Leicester, said: “The use well reflects the interaction between human activity and the surrounding environment. The increase of wildland urban interface areas, with the associated forest fire risk, could be interpreted like an intrusion of the urban model in the wild areas. The rural abandonment, the touristic pressure and the urban sprawl have determined an increase of contact between urban and wildland.

“This study highlights the importance of the geographic data availability. The presence of a homogeneous and standardized European database supports the environmental analysis. The use of digital cartography and the viable production of thematic maps opens several possibilities not only to the scientific research sector but to territorial operators involved in planning actions too.”

Dr Paquale Borrelli from the European Commission’s Joint Research Centre in Ispra, added: “Wise land management can provide a valuable ecosystem service of fire risk reduction that is currently not explicitly included in ecosystem service valuations. The results reemphasise the importance of including this ecosystem service in landscape valuations to account for the significant landscape function of reducing the of catastrophic large fires.”

Read more at: http://phys.org/news/2016-03-wildfire-reveals-countries-europe-catastrophic.html#jCpEvery adversity is an opportunity in disguise. Today marks the International Day of Forests, a moment of global celebration to raise awareness of the importance of forests to the ecosystem and to humanity.

This day is of particular significance to Indonesia, home to the world’s third largest tropical forested area, and offers a great opportunity to highlight existing solutions to address one of the country’s most challenging issues: annual forest fires and forest-related crimes.

As part of its commitment to protect national natural resources, UNDP and UN-REDD Program, with support from Norway, have worked with the Ministry of Environment and Forestry, the National Police Forces and the Attorney General Office to pursue a new effective approach to tackle environment-related crimes in forest areas and peatlands, including forest fires.

 This approach is called the “multi-door approach” and attempts to both prevent offenders from violating Indonesia’s environmental laws and to ensure that corporate accountability, recovery of state losses and restoration of the environment are incorporated into every investigation for forest-related crimes.

This approach can be an effective tool to combat forest fires, often triggered by the clearing of land for agricultural purposes.

Illegal land clearing by burning is an example of a natural resource and environment-related crime that requires systematic investigations and mutual cooperation between various government and law enforcement agencies.

The full enforcement of these environmental protection laws are an essential step toward better protection and management of forests and peatlands in Indonesia.

The financial and environmental losses of environment-related crimes are staggering. According to the Ministry of Environment and Forestry, an average of 0.7 million hectares of forest were lost every year from 1990 to 2013, through illegal actions — that is a total of over 16 million hectares, which is nearly the size of Cambodia.

They also have a cost to State revenues; in 2015, the Corruption Eradication Commission estimated that the shortfall in State revenue due to these illegal actions amounts to US$6.47 to $8.98 billion from 2007 to 2013.

The multi-door approach has not yet been integrated into performance-based indicators of relevant institutions.

In May 2013, the national police, the Attorney General, the Ministry of Forestry, and the Ministry of Environment signed a Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) to adopt the multi-door approach when handling natural resources and environment-related crimes in forest areas and peatlands.

UNDP Indonesia has recently presented findings of an assessment — undertaken at the government’s request — on the effectiveness of the Multi-Door Approach.

The results of our assessment show that, in practice, the Standard Operating Procedures (SOP) of law enforcement agencies were not yet aligned with the guidelines under multi-door approach, despite the formal agreement signed in 2013.

The UNDP assessment recommends three key elements for improved law enforcement for forest related crimes: (1) the establishment of guidelines and inter-agency coordination via the Multiple-Door Approach; (2) the need for capacity building for informed and knowledgeable enforcement personnel and (3) to ensure that all enforcement agencies explicitly incorporate the Multi-Door Approach into their daily operations to incentivize compliance.

Firstly, the handling of crimes in forest areas and peatlands require increased coordination between law enforcement agencies and government institutions mandated to investigate natural resource and environment-related crimes.

This includes civil servant investigators in the environment, forestry, taxation and plantation sectors.

If there are indications or reports of crimes such as violations of the Plantation Law and the Law on Spatial Planning, corruption or money laundering, following the multiple-door approach, the first institution that receives the report should then inform other relevant law enforcement agencies to trigger appropriate action.

Therefore, agencies can complement each other by bringing in witnesses and including experts from outside ministries or agencies, when required by the police or prosecutors investigating environmental crimes.

The second element is capacity building for informed enforcement personnel. In addition to understanding specific environmental laws, investigators must also be knowledgeable of interrelated regulations, which may be indirectly related to a forest fire case, such as the Plantation Law that regulates the scope of a plantation area.

This also includes capacity building for judges to increase their technical skills when overseeing legal proceedings for forestry-related crimes, which UNDP is addressing with the support of the European Union.

Lastly, the multi-door approach has not yet been integrated into performance-based indicators of relevant institutions.

This fact diminishes the incentives for each institution to implement the approach. It would be much more effective if the multi-door approach was incorporated as one of the performance indicators for the signatories of the MOU.

Taking action on the three aforementioned elements is expected to significantly improve law enforcement for natural resource and environment-related crimes throughout the country. Such improvement can lead to the prosecution of the relatively “untouchable masterminds”, companies and individuals who engineer the illegal actions that lead to annual burning of Indonesia’s forests.

As just last week, hotspots signifying forest fires began to reappear in the islands of Sumatra and Kalimantan. In response, the Indonesian government has pledged swifter responses to tackle the annual forest fires that cause a choking haze and blanket these two islands.

The multi-door approach offers an opportunity to make a significant breakthrough in addressing peatland and forest crimes, through increased coordination and inter agency cooperation.

What is urgently needed now is the full implementation of this approach by all relevant law enforcement and governmental agencies to prevent a reoccurrence of last year’s historic levels of ecological and economic losses, caused by Indonesia’s annual forest fires.

Strengthened cooperation and coordination will make a real difference to effectively tackle this complex issue and improve the wellbeing of Indonesia’s people, environment and economy. – See more at: http://www.thejakartapost.com/news/2016/03/21/multi-door-approach-address-forest-related-crimes-indonesia.html#sthash.7UIq6Xis.dpufOfficials of the Department of Game and Wildlife have called for a thorough cleaning of the environment to ward off reptiles, following preliminary investigations and assessment they conducted in Essienimpong and Kwaaso in the Ejisu municipality which have been invaded by snakes.

The team, who visited the two communities and interacted with the people, believe that the recent long drought coupled with the destruction of the natural habitat through bushfires might have forced the reptiles to invade these towns, since their habitat had been destroyed.


Regional Manager

Speaking to the Daily Graphic, the Regional Manager of the Wildlife Division for Brong Ahafo and Ashanti, Mr Charles Haizel, said preliminary assessment by his men indicated that the snakes moved to the communities and laid their eggs as a result of a bushfire in a forest in the area.

He said samples of the snakes had been taken for further studies and identification, adding that it could also be that the recent heavy rains might have washed them from where they were hatched to the communities.


The two communities were gripped with fear and panic after the invasion of their homes and shops by hundreds of the snakes.

Since last Monday, the residents have been living in great trepidation, especially when the snakes, three different types, emerged from holes in homes and street sides, usually after 7p.m. each day.

As many as 87 snakes were killed one night in a single house.

It became worse last Wednesday night when the lights went off. Most of the members of the community, especially the youth, went out on a snake-killing spree.

– See more at: http://www.graphic.com.gh/news/general-news/60481-bushfire-caused-movement-of-snakes.html#sthash.cul66mFs.dpuf

Print Friendly, PDF & Email
WP-Backgrounds Lite by InoPlugs Web Design and Juwelier Schönmann 1010 Wien