The federal firefighting system is “imploding” in California, due to poor spending decisions and high job vacancy rates, as the region struggles to keep pace with what looks to be a historic fire season, a firefighters’ advocacy group charges.
As a result, the firefighters say, small fires have exploded into extended, multimillion-dollar conflagrations because the U.S. Forest Service has been unable to contain them during the early “initial attack” stage.
“The federal fire system is imploding in California. They are crossing their fingers and just hoping they get through the season without a disaster,” said Casey Judd, who represents government firefighters from five agencies through the Federal Wildland Fire Service Association.
As the “sheer number” of California wildfires pushed the nation to its worst measurable level of wildland-fire preparedness last week Level 5 a national multiagency coordinating group announced in a memo Monday that firefighter staffing levels in Northern California “cannot be maintained.”
In past years, the nation’s average fire-preparedness level for June and July has hovered around a moderate 2 or 3. A Level 5 means that national firefighting resources are stretched critically thin across several regions.
By last Wednesday, 84 wildfires in California were being allowed to burn “unstaffed,” according to a report issued by the National Park Service.
“Many of the existing fires in Northern California have the potential to burn through much of the summer and into the fall until rainfall increases,” said the report, which called the current fire season “unprecedented” and described the firefighter shortage as “acute.”
Of all the agencies battling California wildland fires including the region’s two largest, the Indians and Basin fires in Monterey County’s Los Padres National Forest it is U.S. Forest Service crews that suffer the highest vacancy rates, entering this year’s season with an estimated shortage of 500 firefighters, Judd said. Fully staffed, the region has authorized a force of 4,432 firefighters for the season.
Last year, the Forest Service’s Southern California region lost 47 percent of its newly hired firefighting work force, according to a Forest Service report.
“We acknowledge some national forests areas in California have retention challenges, but we believe these situations are manageable,” Forest Service overseer Mark Rey said in testimony before a Senate committee on wildfire preparedness last month.
“For the 2008 fire season, we will have available firefighting forces firefighters, equipment, and aircraft comparable to those available in 2007,” Rey said. He added that it is not unusual for the agency to be short-staffed when fighting multiple fires at once.
“Recruitment, retention and training of our firefighters are an important focus of the (service) one that is critical to our success,” he said. “We are committed to the brave women and men across the country serving as wildland firefighters and wildland fire program managers.”
Regional Forest Service officials in California didn’t respond to a request for comment about fire staffing levels.
Many engines unmanned
After facing pressure from California Sen. Dianne Feinstein and other lawmakers last spring, the Forest Service promised it would immediately fill its vacancies and launched a “Fire Hire” campaign to attract firefighters in Sacramento that concluded two weeks ago.
“I believe the agency should have been able to muster a stronger force,” Feinstein said. “All signs indicate that things will only get worse.”
Feinstein said that despite promises of full staffing from Rey, only 186 of the agency’s 276 engines were manned at the start of the 2008 fire season.
Ron Thatcher, president of the union that represents 20,000 Forest Service employees, has estimated that attrition has left the service at 70 percent to 80 percent of its authorized staffing levels, and that up to 39 percent of fire crew leader positions were vacant as the 2008 fire season kicked off.
Part of the service’s retention problem lies in the fact that when called to battle a wildfire for two or more weeks, federal firefighters are only paid for up to 14 hours’ work per day, while their state counterparts are paid “portal to portal” that is, 24 hours’ pay for all the days they are on scene, including rest days.
Federal firefighters are “away from home, away from family. And they’re working alongside others who are going to get compensated for all their time, while they’re not,” Judd said. “It’s just nutty.”
Other firefighters working for Cal Fire and to an even greater extent, municipal departments who are called in to assist with wildland fires stand to earn thousands of dollars more in annual compensation than Forest Service crew members.
A Forest Service report issued this year estimated a federal firefighter can bring home $56,096 a year while a Cal Fire firefighter earns $64,760. Entry-level federal firefighters often make less. It is this difference that has caused federal fire crews to leave the service for other agencies, including Cal Fire.
Clueless about program
Another issue that firefighters say may come back to bite the region is a brand-new budgetary program called “accountable cost management” that was just introduced throughout the Forest Service. Judd said it should have been initiated well before the 2008 fire season started.
“National fire commanders could have been briefed on this during the winter and created a budget. The program was thrown on fire chiefs in the summer,” Judd said.
“The Indians Fire commander had no clue about this program, and they’re looking at (cutting) the least expensive resources. The bean counters are looking at these folks and basically timing them as to how long they spend on dinner. Accountable cost management is you’re looking at minutiae and ignoring the real costs,” Judd said.
“We think obviously there should be a mechanism for cost containment, but it works better for static programs rather than something as dynamic as fire,” he said.
The “real costs” to be cut, according to Judd, who recently testified on national fire preparedness before the Senate committee in Washington, D.C., are the dollars spent on outsourcing firefighting jobs to Cal Fire and other agencies because the Forest Service is so understaffed.
In last year’s Zaca Fire in the southern portion of Los Padres National Forest, the vast majority of the $188 million spent went to “nonfederal resources,” according to Judd, although he said the Forest Service has not been able to provide his group with an exact accounting of funds spent.
Judd said the personnel shortage means off-season work that could have been performed by federal fire crews such as removing fire fuels like dead trees and underbrush has been neglected, resulting in bigger, faster-burning fires.
Rey has countered that such fire-prevention work was set back because environmental groups filed lawsuits delaying the clearing of drought-affected wildlands.
Fully preparing all national forests for the fire season, he said, would require “double the size of the suppression force, perhaps at twice the cost.”
Stressing fiscal responsibility, Rey said his department spent $100 million less last year than in 2006 for direct fire suppression.
Prevention pays off
Judd’s group maintains that investing more in prevention and suppression would pay for itself with faster fire containment and lower outsourcing costs. He and others have speculated that under Rey a Bush appointee with a long career in the timber industry the Forest Service appears to want to get out of the firefighting business altogether by simply outsourcing more fire contracts to states and cities.
“I don’t know what more it’s going to take, after the Southern California and Lake Tahoe fires last year,” Judd said.
In San Diego-area fires alone last October, 500,000 acres burned, some 1,500 homes were destroyed and nine people lost their lives.
“As California goes,” said Judd, “so goes the rest of the nation.”