GFMC
  • About GFMC
    • GLOBAL FIRE MONITORING CENTER
      • About the GFMC
      • Partners and Sponsors of the GFMC
      • GFMC Activities Calendar
      • Contact
      • GFMC AWARDS
      • Arbeitsgruppe Feuerökologie
        • Feuerökologie
        • Forschung
        • Veröffentlichungen
        • Promotionen
        • Diplomarbeiten
        • Kurse
        • Fakultät für Umwelt und Natürliche Ressourcen
        • Uni Freiburg
      • Technologie-Entwicklung
      • Weltraum-Sensorik
  • Global Cooperation
    • Global Wildland Fire Network (GWFN)
      • GWFN Home
      • Direct access to the 14 Regional Wildland Fire Networks
      • Regional Eurasian Wildland Fire Network
      • Regional Southeast Europe / Caucasus Wildland Fire Network
      • Sub-Regional Euro-Alpine Wildland Fire Network
      • Regional Central Asia Wildland Fire Network
      • Regional Northeast Asia Wildland Fire Network
      • Regional South Asia Wildland Fire Network
      • Regional South East Asia Wildland FireNetwork (ASEAN)
      • Regional Australasia Wildland Fire Network (AFAC)
      • Regional Subsahara Africa Wildland FireNetwork (Afrifirenet)
      • Regional North America Wildland Fire Network
      • Regional South America Wildland FireNetwork
      • Regional Mesoamerica Wildland Fire Network
      • Regional Caribbean Wildland Fire Network
      • Regional Mediterranean Wildland Fire Network (Silva Mediterranea Forest Fire Working Group)
    • Regional Fire Management Resource Centers (RFMRCs) and Regional Fire Monitoring Centers (RFMCs)
      • Regional Fire Monitoring Center for Southeast Europe / Caucasus (RFMC)
      • Regional Eastern Europe Fire Monitoring Center (REEFMC)
      • Regional Central Asia Fire Management Resource Center (RCAFMRC)
      • Regional Fire Management Resource Center – South East Asia Region (RFMRC-SEA)
      • Regional Eurasia Fire Monitoring Center (REFMC)
      • Regional Fire Management Resource Center – South America Region (RFMRC-SAR)
      • Regional Eastern Africa Fire Management Resource Center (REAFMRC)
      • Regional Western Africa Fire Management Resource Center (RWAFMRC)
      • International Organizations
      • United Nations (UN)
      • European Multilateral Organizations (Council of Europe, OSCE, FOREST EUROPE)
      • Amazon Cooperation Treaty Organization (ACTO)
      • International Tropical Timber Organization (ITTO)
      • The World Bank
      • North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO)
      • European Commission
      • INSARAG
      • CTIF
    • IWPM – Portal
      • The IWPM in Brief
      • IWPM – Background Reading
      • Offers and Recent Successful Capacity Building by Exchange
      • International Fire Aviation Guidelines
      • Int. Wildfire Emergency Assistance
      • Emergency Assistance through the United Nations and the GFMC
      • INTERNATIONAL AGREEMENTS FOR ASSISTANCE IN LANDSCAPE FIRE EMERGENCIES
      • Satellite Data for Wildland Fire Emergency Response
      • International Wildland Fire Response Operators and Material Suppliers
      • International Wildland Fire Assistance
  • Global Fire News
    • Global Landscape Fire News
      • 2024
      • 2023
      • 2022
      • 2021
      • 2020
      • 2019
      • 2018
      • 2017
      • 2016
      • 2015
      • 2014
      • 2013
      • 2012
      • 2011
      • 2010
      • 2009
      • 2008
      • 2007
      • 2006
      • 2005
      • 2004
      • 1999 to 2003
    • GFMC NEWS
      • GFMC Activities by Calendar Year
      • Global Landscape Fire Network Bulletins
      • GFMC News and Publications
      • UNISDR Global Wildland Fire Network (GWFN)
      • Past Conferences
      • CURRENT GLOBAL FIRE STATUS
      • Access to Current Global Landscape Fire Maps & Selected Archived Global Fire Events
      • EARLY WARNING PORTAL
      • Global Fire Early Warning System
      • LANDSCAPE FIRE EMISSIONS PORTAL
      • Regional and Global Landscape Fire Emissions
  • Fire Management
    • International Landscape Fire Management Programmes
      • Community-Based Fire Management (CBFiM)
        • CBFiM basics
        • Village Defense
        • Training
        • Gender
        • Children
        • Indigenous Communities
        • Religious Communities
        • Migrants and Refugees
        • Protected Areas
        • CBFiM – Country Reports / Activities
        • Tourism
        • Climate Change
        • Research and Literature
        • Materials
        • Processes
        • Meetings
        • Media News
        • Links
    • Eurasian Fire in Nature Conservation Network (EFNCN)
      • Objectives
      • Members
      • Eurasia White Paper
      • EFNCN Projects
      • Experiments, Training, Meetings
      • Background Information
      • Links
      • Contact
      • International Peatland Fire Network
      • International Peatland Fire Network
      • International Technical Coop Projects in Fire Management and Research
      • International Technical Coop Projects in Fire Management and Research
      • Fire Initiatives and Projects by NGOs
      • Fire Initiatives and Projects by NGOs
    • Landscape Fire Management Training & Employment Opportunities
      • EuroFire Competency Standards and Training Materials
      • Fire Management Courses and University Training
      • Retrospectives of Fire Meetings & Training Courses
      • Research and Employment Opportunities
      • Landscape Fire Management Glossaries and Guidelines
      • Fire Management Glossaries
      • GFMC Fire Management Guidelines
  • Publications & Research
    • Publications and Global Landscape Fire Statistics
      • International Forest Fire News (IFFN) (1989-2015)
    • Global Landscape Fire Inventories and Models
      • Global Burnt Area Satellite Products
      • Other Remote Sensing Products
      • Fire Statistical Databases
      • Global Fire Models
      • Global Wildland Fire Assessment
    • Landscape Fire Research
      • GFMC Technology Development
      • GFMC and Space Research
      • GFMC and the United Nations University (UNU)
      • International Landscape Fire Research Programs (IGBP-IGAC-BIBEX, IBFRA, IUFRO and other)
    • Online Literature & Software
      • Online Publications, Libraries and Bibliographies
      • U.S. Fire Information Systems and Software Products
      • International Association of Wildland Fire (IAWF)
      • GFMC Photo Archive and Contests
  • Conferences
    • Upcoming and Past Landscape Fire Conferences, Symposia and other Meetings
      • International, Regional and National Conferences and Meetings
    • Archive of GFMC / GWFN Conferences
      • Conferences organized by GFMC since 1977
    • International Wildland Fire Conferences (IWFC)
      • International Wildland Fire Conferences (IWFC) 1989-2023
  • Search
  • Menu

Namibia Round Table on Fire, Windhoek, 10-11 November 1999

na

Namibia Round Table on Fire
Windhoek, 10-11 November 1999

(IFFN No. 25, July 2001)

  1. Preparation of the Round Table

In early 1998 the Namibia-Finland Forestry Programme was supported by the Fire Ecology Research Group which in the same year established the Global Fire Monitoring Center (GFMC). One of the main aims of the GFMC is to facilitate countries, the UN system and other international organizations, including NGOs, in developing fire science programmes, technology transfer to fire management and policy development (see: <http://www.gfmc.online>). In consultation with the Research Group / GFMC is was proposed to develop a “National Fire Policy and Guidelines on Fire Management in Namibia (Goldammer 1998). The following paragraphs are extracted from the 1998 report and updated where necessary.

2.1 Fire in Namibia: History, Use and Problems

In the evolutionary history natural fires caused by lightning have significantly contributed to shape Namibia’s savanna and forest ecosystems. In addition, fire influence through traditional burning practices over millennia has strongly favoured and selected plant communities that are considered to be sustainable and long-term stable fire ecosystems if not affected by additional disturbances.

However, in the recent past fire regimes are undergoing dramatic changes. This is the consequence of decline in nomadic life and the overall increasing human population pressure on these areas where fire is being used extensively as a land utilization tool, e.g., for conversion of forested/wooded lands into agricultural lands; for maintaining grazing lands; and for facilitating the utilization of non-wood forest products, e.g. honey collection and hunting. Formerly sustainable time-space-fire relationships are being altered in the wake of changing land-use practices. Forest ecosystem and site degradation becomes most visible where excessive disturbances by logging have changed the equilibrium between vegetation composition (tree species, occupation of sites by invading grasses), fuel characteristics (available flammable material), and fire behaviour. One of the main reasons of degradation is the increase of wind and water erosion of the Kalahari sand soils. As a consequence, ecological damages and loss of biodiversity become more and more visible. High economic losses are caused by fire damaging valuable timber and non-timber resources, natural regeneration, and planted forests. Indiscriminate burning in Namibia’s forests and grazing lands has also led to increasing losses in pastoral resources and losses of domestic livestock. Fires in the interface of wildlands and residential areas often cause the loss of human lives, property, and other values at risk, e.g., food stores, power and communication lines, other infrastructures, and livelihoods.

In addition, large-scale burning of vegetation exerts impacts on the regional and global atmosphere. Emissions from wildland fires in Namibia are important sources of radiatively active trace gases and aerosols. Those fires which are associated with the degradation of vegetative cover consequently lead to the reduction of the carbon sequestration potential. Thus, they contribute directly to the anthropogenic greenhouse effect.

Altogether, the current levels of wildfire occurrence and severity are seen as incompatible with the nation’s social goals and resource management objectives.

This proposal to develop Guidelines on Fire Management in Namibia is aimed to provide the basis for an in-depth preparation of a set of guidelines for the various administrative settings and ecosystems concerned. Major emphasis in this proposal is on fire prevention, particularly on a community-based approach.

2.2 Crosscutting / Intersectoral and International Issues

This report seeks cross-references to various national regulations and strategic plans. The proposal is also considering regional plans for the Southern African region and international binding and non-binding conventions.

2.2.1 The Namibia Forestry Strategic Plan

The Namibia Forestry Strategic Plan (Directorate of Forestry 1996) provides the framework for fire policy and management planning. The Strategic Plan is based on ecological, environmental, cultural, and socio-economic considerations. The Plan considers “Production, Protection and Participation” as the three imperatives of forest policy.

In this context, the plan underscores the need of reducing the negative effects of fires by stating in Section 3.2.1 that

“The occurrence and severity of uncontrolled and accidental forest fires has to be reduced, and the policy of burning off patches of woodlands to improve hunting grounds, should be changed to one using fire only as a controlled tool under specific circumstances”.

Furthermore it is stated in Section 3.2.4 that

“Participation of local communities and the private sector is essential for the sustainable use of the forest resources. The active involvement of local communities in management and conservation of forest resources is desirable for the purposes of environmental protection and for significant increases in rural incomes and employment levels.”

Besides the statement, that “Policy formulation must precede the formulation of forest legislation” (Section 3.3.1) it is also underscored that “there is no reason why different regions in Namibia should not adopt different policies” – an important statement which will open the options for the development of fire policies which are in accordance with the distinctly different impacts of fire (or fire regimes) in the various vegetation types of the country.

Under the expected contribution of the programmes towards the achievement of sectoral and national objectives (Section 5) the environmental forestry programme underscores that

“Strategic forest protection of biodiversity and sequestering of carbon (to restrict potential climate change) will make possible for Namibia to meet the requirements of the International Conventions on Biodiversity and Climate Change.”

The Namibia Climate Change Report must be seen in this context (see para 2.4).

2.2.2 Forest Act, Forest Ordinance, and Regulations under the Forest Act

The Forest Act No.72 of 1968 provides some brief procedural regulations on clearing of fire belts and rules of fire control. The Preservation of Trees and Forest Ordinance, assented to 8 July 1952[1], regulates the use of fire in construction of fire belts and assistance in fire suppression. The new Forest Act of Namibia (which is in preparation) will provide rules on fire management. The Final Draft of the Regulations under the new Forest Act of Namibia shall provide several regulations concerning fire, namely on access and connecting roads in forest reserves and on the composition, functions and procedures of fire management committees.

2.2.3 Other Regulations of the Ministry for Agriculture, Water and Rural Development, Ministry for Environment and Tourism, and the Department of Women’s Affairs

At the time of writing the 1998 report no statements could be found regarding fire policies, rules or regulations under the responsibility of the Ministry for Agriculture, Water and Rural Development. The Ministry of Local Governments and Housing in a policy statement (not formally decided by the Cabinet) has taken over the responsibility for rural fire control.

The Directorate of Environmental Affairs, Ministry for Environment and Tourism, has clearly indicated that it will support future intersectoral policies in fire management.

The Office of the President, Department of Women’s Affairs has finalized the National Gender Policy in 1998. In Section “Gender and the Management of the Environment” emphasis has been given on the role of women in protecting the environment. Although fire management has not yet bee mentioned explicitly in that section it is expected that more detailed activity programmes will include a fire component.

2.2.4 UN Convention on Climate Change

Namibia in 1995 has ratified the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC). Consequently, Namibia submitted a report detailing its contributions and its vulnerability to climate change to the Secretariat of the Framework Convention on Climate Change. The inventory of contributions to climate change includes emissions from the agricultural sector, notably those from land-use changes and vegetation fires. Thus, from the point of view of this binding international convention, Namibia is required to provide quantitative assessments of free-burning vegetation fires.

The mitigation strategies are an important part of the Climate Change Report. A national fire management policy and a derived fire management strategy, as proposed by this report, consequently will have an important focus on the reduction of those fires which are detrimental not only from the point of view of protection of ecosystems, biodiversity, and productivity, but also in regard to contributing to regional and global changes of atmosphere and climate.

2.2.5 The UN International Decade on Natural Disaster Reduction (IDNDR)

The development of a national fire policy and guidelines on fire management are in accordance with the UN Resolution 44/236 in which the 1990’s were designated as the International Decade on Natural Disaster Reduction (IDNDR). The basic idea behind this proclamation of the Decade was and still remains to be the unacceptable and rising levels of losses which disasters continue to incur on the one hand, and the existence, on the other hand, of a wealth of scientific and engineering know-how which could be effectively used to reduce losses resulting from disasters. The general objective of the Decade (which ends in 1999) was:

to reduce through concerted international actions, especially in developing countries, loss of life, property damage and economic disruption caused by natural disasters such as earthquakes, windstorms, tsunamis, floods, landslides, volcanic eruptions, wildfires and other calamities of natural origin such as grasshopper and locust infestations.

The following four goals represent the desired destinations which Decade efforts should lead to:

  1.  improve the capacity of each country to mitigate the effects of natural disasters expeditiously and effectively, paying special attention to assisting developing countries in the assessment of disaster damage potential and in the establishment of early warning systems and disaster-resistant structures when and where needed;
  2. devise appropriate guidelines and strategies for applying existing scientific and technical knowledge, taking into account the cultural and economic diversity among nations;
  3. foster scientific and engineering endeavours aimed at closing critical gaps in knowledge in order to reduce loss of life and property;
  4. develop measures for the assessment, prediction, prevention and mitigation of natural disasters through programmes of technical assistance and technology transfer, demonstration projects, and education and training, tailored to specific disasters and locations, and to evaluate the effectiveness of those programmes.

Based on the above broadly defined goals, it was found necessary to focus on a number of specific areas of activities which would mark progress to be achieved at the end of the Decade period.

By the year 2000, all countries, as part of their plan to achieve sustainable development, should have in place:

  1.  comprehensive national assessments of risks from natural hazards, with these assessments taken into account in development plans;
  2. mitigation plans at national and/or local levels, involving long-term prevention and preparedness and community awareness, and
  3. ready access to global, regional, national and local warning systems and broad dissemination of warnings.

Namibia as a signatory country of the IDNDR has placed its National Committee of Namibia under the auspices of the Office of the Prime Minister (Emergency Unit). In the information provided by Namibia’s national report to the IDNDR it was clearly stated that the country considered wildfires to be a prevailing hazard.[2]

The development of a national fire policy, fire management guidelines and management capabilities in Namibia will assist the government of Namibia to meet the targets set by the IDNDR. As the Decade will be terminated by end of December 1999, successor arrangements have to be defined at national levels

2.2.6 The Rome Declaration on Forestry and the FAO Forest Resources Assessment 2000

The FAO convened the Ministerial Meeting on Forestry on “Sustainability Issues in Forestry, the National and International Challenges”, Rome, 8-9 March 1999. On 9 March 1999 the Forest Ministers released the “Rome Declaration on Forestry”. The statements regarding forest fires are based on the resumée “Global Action to Address Forest Fires” which was a summary of the recommendations of the Expert Meeting on Public Policies Affecting Forest Fires (FAO, Rome, October 1998). The Ministerial Meeting, among other, welcomed the recommendations the Fourteenth Session of the Committee on Forestry (COFO) (Rome, 2 March 1999) and encouraged their endorsement by the FAO Council with a view to facilitating their early implementation.

In the Rome Declaration on Forestry of 9 March 1999 the ministers responsible for forests or their representatives, among other:

  • noted that the causes of forest fires are many and complex and recognizing the need to harness efforts to prevent forest fires as well as to address the multiple causes and consequences of fires around the globe,
  • welcomed the meeting on Public Policies Affecting Forest Fires hosted by FAO in October 1998 and encourage FAO to take action to implement the recommendations directed to it,
  • called on FAO and other international organizations, donor agencies and interested countries to work together to address the underlying causes of forest fires, to improve the coordination of their efforts to prevent and combat forest fires and to rehabilitate affected areas with a view to providing assistance requested by governments,

Beginning with the Round Table on Fire Namibia intends to implement the recommendations of the Rome Declaration.

It must also be mentioned that Namibia must provide the fire statistical information to the FAO as required by the Forest Resources Assessment 2000 (FRA 2000). In the frame of the FRA 2000 the FAO collects data on the numbers of fires and area burned for the period 1990‑99 for all wildfires or any fire occurring on forest and other wooded land. Like many countries Namibia must urgently build up technical and human resource capabilities to conduct fire inventories on a regular base.

2.2.7 Regional Cooperation within the Southern African Development Community (SADC)

All member countries of the Southern African Development Community (SADC) have one unifying problem, among other, the problems of changing fire regimes associated with population growth, land-use changes, and land degradation. It is consequent that SADC came up with proposals on a regional Southern African wildfire management project. In 1992, during discussions between representatives of the Forestry Sector Technical Co‑ordination Unit (FSTCU) of SADC and USDA Forest Service, the possibility of a SADC‑wide regional forest fire management system was raised. This led to terms of reference in 1994 for an investigation or review of the situation in each country, a report on the findings and recommendations that were discussed at a meeting in Lusaka in November 1995, attended by representatives of 11 of the then 12 SADC countries and by the project team, consisting of experts from the United States and Canada. The review was sponsored by the United States Department of Agriculture Forest Service and the Canadian International Development Agency (CIDA). A follow-up report was produced in February 1996. This report contains recommendations leading to project proposals which are presented in some detail. A list of recommendations contained in the follow‑up report was provided by Kromhout (1999) and is given below.

SADC‑Wide Recommendations

Chapter 3 of the SADC Regional Forest Fire Management System Review report details the following recommendations:

  1.  All resource management agencies involved with a fire responsibility need to adopt a proactive attitude to fire management. As a first step, a position should be dedicated to fire management at the national level and preferably at the regional and project levels as well. The establishment of these positions will provide accountability for the fire management program.
    Status: accepted in principle by member states attending a workshop in Lusaka, Zambia, 21-23 November 1995.
  2. SADC members should commit to building cooperative fire management arrangements with each other in order to accomplish their fire management objectives, as opposed to “going it alone”. These arrangements should include sharing of resources, operational understandings on common border zones, joint participation in training initiatives, research and technology, and information exchange.
    Status: accepted in principle by member states attending the workshop in Lusaka, Zambia, November 1995, and further developed in Project Proposal No.1.
  3. FSTCU should arrange for a team to visit Angola to gather information regarding their fire management situation which could be included in an updated version of this report.
    Status: completed with FSTCU visit to Angola in August of 1995 and subsequent publication of “Addendum to the SADC Regional Forest Fire Management Systems Review Project” in November 1995.
  4. FSTCU should convene a meeting of SADC country forestry, national park and wildlife representatives to review this report and to chart a course for implementation of the Project Proposals.
    Status: completed through workshop held in Lusaka, Zambia, 21-23 November 1995, attended by 11 of the 12 SADC member states.
  5. Following the meeting mentioned in above (No.4), SADC should consider the need to develop a strategic action plan for implementing a fire management program in Southern Africa.
    Status: to be addressed; accepted in principle at Lusaka workshop.
  6. In the absence of comprehensive data on fire occurrence and extent at the national level in most countries, a regional program should be developed to monitor and report vegetation loss to fire.
    Status: accepted in principle at Lusaka workshop and further developed in Project

Proposal No.1.

SADC Regional Wildfire Management Project Proposals

Incorporating the direction and prioritization provided by the delegates to the Lusaka workshop, four Project Proposals, each with several Modules, have been developed:

Regional Wildfire Management Coordination

Modules:

  • Wildfire Management Coordinating Group
  • Wildfire Management Specialist
  • Wildfire Monitoring and Assessment Information System
  • Equipment Development and Acquisition
  •  International Wildfire Agreements
  • Wildfire Weather Data Network

Wildfire Personnel Training

Modules:

  • Basic Wildfire Suppression Training
  •  Forestry College Improvements
  • Mid-Career Internships

Wildfire Prevention and Public Education

Modules:

  • Wildfire Prevention Information Materials
  • Extension Training ‑ Wildfire Management

Operational Wildfire Research and Technology Transfer

Modules:

  •  Prescribed Burning ‑ Miombo Woodlands
  • Operational Fire Management Research ‑ Zambezi Teak Woodlands
  • Wildfire Management Demonstration Centres

After the proposal to USAID to fund the implementation of the wildfire management proposals was declined. FSTCU is still seeking assistance in implementing the projects that have been identified. Although donors dislike funding that cannot be taken over by the budgets of recipients, to avoid dependency, some of the projects are not of a kind to cause dependency when funded by donors.

2.2.8 Recommendations by the International Tropical Timber Organization (ITTO) through the “Guidelines on Fire Management in Tropical Forests”

Between 1993 and 1997 the International Tropical Timber Organization (ITTO) developed “Guidelines on Fire Management in Tropical Forests” (ITTO 1997). These fire management guidelines are designed to provide a base for policy makers and managers at various levels to develop programs and projects in which the specific national, socio-economic, and natural problems related to fire in tropical natural and planted forests will be addressed. The scope of the guidelines is to assist the ITTO member countries (producer and consumer countries) to develop programs for reducing damage caused by fire; and to help tropical forest managers and rural residents to safely use and take advantage of the beneficial effects of fire in land-use systems. The guidelines recognize that many forest fires originate in the agricultural and pastoral systems; and in degraded vegetation which is outside of forests. Therefore, fire management on former and degraded forest lands may help to re-establish productive forests and to safeguard the success of reforestation programs.

At present, Indonesia is the first country in which the general ITTO guidelines are “fine-tuned” to the national level. However, the ITTO guidelines are not exclusively developed for the ITTO Member Countries or the tropical countries sensu strictu.[3] The guidelines address principles which are also valid outside the ITTO region, especially in the less developed world of the subtropical and temperate zones. Namibia could certainly take advantage of ITTO’s precursor work when formulating a national fire policy and fire management strategy.

2.3 Conclusions and Recommendations

It is clear that the various fire regimes and fire effects in forestry, wildlife conservancy and land-use of Namibia will require a set of measures in fire management. The following conclusions and recommendations require a coordinated national approach leading to a clear fire policy and its implementation through a series of measures within the timeframe of 1998-2001.

Creation of an Inter-Agency Round Table on Fire Management and Development of a National Fire Policy and Fire Management Guidelines

The various agencies and land owners to be involved in the implementation of a national fire management program need to agree on clearly defined responsibilities, joint strategies and sharing of resources. An inter-agency round table should be created as soon as possible. This could be initiated in a workshop, tentatively entitled “Development of a National Fire Policy and Guidelines on Fire Management in Namibia”. Besides the agencies concerned, this workshop should involve NGOs, women’s groups, the donor community, international programmes and representatives of fire science and related fields.

The proposed objectives of the Workshop are:

  1. to provide all parties represented in the workshop with comprehensive information on the present status and problems in the field of vegetation fires and fire management in Namibia;
  2. to introduce a framework which can assist to guide and coordinate national responsibilities and international assistance;
  3. to provide an opportunity for potential international partners to express their interests and ideas with respect to a cooperation in the development of a functioning Long-Term Integrated Forest Fire Management System in Namibia and a basic fire science program;
  4.  to define follow-up procedures of this international workshop.

Desirable results and recommendations of the workshop:

  1. The development of a Long-Term Integrated Forest Fire Management (IFFM) System for Namibia is recognized as a field of high priority in order to protect natural, socio-economic and human resources from the detrimental effects of fires.
  2. A basic and most critical task will be to provide the necessary legal and organizational base within the existing structures (Government administration, private sector) in order to strengthen or to create (where not yet available) the fire management capabilities.
  3. International contributions are essential (a) to secure the introduction of fire management methods adapted to the requirements of local political, social, and ecological conditions in Namibia; (b) to provide the funding necessary to build up expertise and infrastructures that will secure the most time-efficient build-up of fire management capabilities in the most critical areas, and (c) to ensure the continuity of research inputs covering the
  4. Both the national (Namibian) and international activities require a high degree of coordination because of the multi-sectoral approach and the multitude of international partners being involved.
  5.  In order to ensure the efficient realization of the required activities a National Fire Management Coordinating Committee needs to be established as a follow-up step.

Proposed terms of reference of a National Fire Management Coordinating Committee:

  1.  to establish a national platform for the development of a Long-Term Integrated Fire Management System;
  2. to ensure an intersectoral approach in which all Government authorities, other organizations and the private sector will participate;
  3.  to coordinate international support to the establishment of the fire management system in order to avoid duplications of activities and investments and to optimize the efficiency of contributions; international partners shall be consulted for coordinating activities; and
  4.  if required, to develop the legal and organizational structure of a permanent body, e.g. a National Fire Management Council, which will ensure the efficiency and future continuity of this national program.
  5. Meeting Report

The Namibia Round Table on Fire was convened in Windhoek, 10-11 November 1999. A broad range of government agencies and non-government organizations of Namibia, governments of neighbouring SADC countries and the international forestry and fire science community was represented by ca. 50 participants. In the first part of the Round Table the presentations of representatives from Namibian, SADC and the international community highlighted the background of fir history, the utilization of fire in land-use systems, the current magnitude of fire occurrence as depicted by spaceborne observations, the sustainable role of fire in certain savanna wildlands and grazing ecosystems, the detrimental role of wildfires in fire-susceptible forests of Namibia and its neighbours countries, and the impact of vegetation fire emissions on the local, regional, and global atmosphere.

After plenary discussion of basic aspects of a national fire policy two breakout working groups were formed in the second part of the Round Table. The groups

addressed the most urgent areas of action and co-ordination by government agencies and stakeholders. The results are summarized in the following.


|

| Country Notes |

24. November 2017/by GFMCadmin

National guidelines on Forest Fire Management in Namibia

na

National Guidelines on Forest Fire Management in Namibia
Final Draft 31 March/2001

(IFFN No. 25 – July 2001)


IV           SOCIO-ECONOMIC CONSIDERATIONS

4.1                Economic implications

Principles on the Damage and Loss of Various Environmental Components

Forests damaged by wild fires will not be able to provide a large number of forest products that are vital to the life of the nation. This is a significant loss in terms of production potentials of the forest. It is estimated that the value of this annual loss amounts to N$ 133 million in East Caprivi. Forest fires also have a negative impact on other environmental components such as: Soil, water resources and air quality. It also affects the regularity of rain falls locally. In the rainy season 1999-2000 East Caprivi received an almost even 700 mm of rainfall over the entire area unlike during the preceding periods of 1996-98 when the variation was from 150 – 800 mm.

Activities

Develop guidelines to estimate the potential direct loss of the national economy due to forest fire. This estimate will assist in helping other parties to understand that programmed fire management cost is substantially less than the losses suffered when fires occur. The required steps for this estimation are:

  1. Study and record the impacts of fire; both direct and indirect
  2. Formulate methodology for estimating financial losses
  3. Determine losses to local communities and the nation at large(micro-macro)

Principles on Cost-Effectiveness of Fire Prevention and Suppression

Anthropogenic fires (human induced) started around rural communities are the main causes of fire. Rural residents often do not understand the value and function of the forest bio-system and they use fire without prepared control measures or advance planning thereby allowing fires to escape.

Activities

  1. Introduce and develop permanent agricultural systems, agro-forestry, agrosilvo-pastoral and fruit tree orchards as alternative solutions to shifting cultivation. Establish demonstration plots to show the above methodologies emphasizing proper fire management practices and measures.
  2. Develop an incentive system to reward communities or other NGOs that apply appropriate land use practices that prevent escaped or accidental fires or reduce fire caused damages to the forest.
  3. Introduce and establish a program for environmental community awareness. Any programs like e.g. the Ostrich (Namibia’s national Forest Fire Logo), Fire Drama Play, The Fire Video, The Fire Story, The Fire Cartoon, Fire Posters, Fire Billboards and the Fire Plays on NBC Radio must be appropriate to the social, cultural and economic background of the local  communities. They must emphasize the function of the forest as “lungs” in the circulation of water in the environment as well as the negative effects of burning the savanna forest too frequently.
  4. Utilize research findings of grass survey in relation to prescribed burning in formulating basis for the Model for Integrated Forest Fire Management in northern Namibia. This model will also suggest methodologies for fire prevention activities in training and educating the people.
  5. Develop and implement agricultural practices for nutrient cycling so that biomass is utilized optimally to enhance soil fertility and avoid wind erosion. By burning off the accumulated humus layer through annual non-prescribed fires, the wind will blow away the topsoil.
  6. Establish demonstration plots showing prescribed burning techniques and results for both genders and for both cattle owners and the rural poor.

4.2 Using Experiences Found in Local Communities for Carrying Out Prescribed Burning According to Plan

Principles on conflicts in land utilization among communities inside and outside forest areas

Conflicts in land use rights among local communities can lead to arson and wildfires. All surrounding communities must get direct benefits from the forests in order to have any incentive to protect the forest. Local communities use fire for economic, agricultural, recreational or cultural interests; and these practices will continue in the future. Some of these experiences may be useful for a wider area, and may be incorporated in the Model for Integrated Forest Fire Management.

Activities

  1. Arrange for consultations with local communities to resolve the conflicts on utilization of forest land in order to protect the area from wild fire.
  2. Train local communities in fire prevention, suppression and prescribed burning techniques so that they are capable in suppressing fire which escape from their planned burnings.
  3. The local Forestry District Office will supply appropriate forest fire tools to local communities that manage their fires.
  4. Eventually their new skills and motivation and will lead to the establishment of a voluntary fire group in each community.
  5. Involve local government and traditional leaders in determining methods of controlling fires in their area. The communities may also need financial assistance in controlling fires on land which belongs to the Government.
  6. Develop exchange of information and experience concerning fire management within the Namibian Regions as well as among neighbouring SADC countries. This exchange may be assisted by international organizations such as the Global Fire Monitoring Centre (GFMC) or alike, NGOs or governments within the SADC.

Principles on the role of Communities around the forest, Traditional Authorities, NGOs and Women Groups in the Management of forest fires

Communities around or within forest areas, Traditional Authorities, NGOs and Women Groups play an important role in fire management. Women often play an big role in agriculture by raising livestock, collecting fuelwood and gathering of non-timber forest products. The women also carry out most of the burning for clearing agricultural lands for shifting cultivation or burning for cultivation of next crop.
Women are often more appreciative and caring for the natural environment, although it is often difficult to involve them in the educational or extension programs due to cultural constraints. Their active participation in forest fire management is crucial in trying to protect the forest resources from wild fires.
Besides this, all family members can actively be involved in the control of fires.

Activities

  • Develop active participation of communities in forest areas and adjacent grass covered tracts. Provide training in the safe and controlled use of fire in rural activities.
  • Develop an effective education program for women on fire utilization and suppression skills at both national (Women Affairs) and local levels.
  • Develop national Gender Policy and Guidelines from the perspective of fire and burning
  • Control wildlife and protect biodiversity by developing a network of permanent fuel breaks and by providing training in prescribed burning.

Country Notes
IFFN No. 25

24. November 2017/by GFMCadmin

National guidelines on Forest Fire Management in Namibia

na

National Guidelines on Forest Fire Management in Namibia
Final Draft 31 March/2001

(IFFN No. 25 – July 2001)


V. PUBLIC TRAINING AND EDUCATION

Definition:

Education includes formal, non-formal (training and extension) and informal education.

5.1 Training and Extension

Principles on the Training of Forestry and Government Officials, Workers and other staff

Every government and non-government official (e.g. in Conservancies and Community forests, National Parks) responsible for forest and land management activities at any level, need to acquire and develop knowledge in forest fire management.
Every forestry staff and worker, and in particular staff who are assigned to forest protection duties, should acquire skills in forest fire management.
Every official, manager, worker and staff member in forestry whose duties cover forest fire management activities, must acquire the skills required in successful forest fire prevention and suppression work.
There is a need to strengthen the IFFM resources within the D.o.F. by establishing a special fire task force at headquarter level. This taskforce will establish links with: NDF, NamPol, Agriculture, NamPower, Works/Roads and NamRail on fire prevention activities.
Additionally one member should be specialized in the education (forest extension) of schools and local communities and commercial farms.

Activities

  1. Identify the number of persons within D.o.F. who are dealing with Integrated Forest fire Management (IFFM) and assess their training needs.
  2. Identify information needs and training requirements for the forestry staff. Training may be provided by dissemination of library material, conducting seminars, workshops, short courses; it
    lso includes study tours on site to look at the forest fire management principles and their application locally
  3. Prepare an IFFM training plan for officials, managers, workers and other staff. This plan should include the targeted number of people to be trained each year as well as the budget allocation required for the training.
  4. Provide training and retraining of IFFM field staff on regular basis in fire prevention and suppression activities. Training needs to be conducted by the Forest Fire Section within the Directorate of Forestry.
  5. Develop a national standard IFFM training curricula for efficient field training; especially in fire prevention and prescribed burning practices.
  6. Keep the Ogongo, Neudamm and UNAM forest fire curricula constantly updated so as to include latest development results and findings in the field.
  7. Disseminate Forest Fire related law (Act) and regulatory measures to all Government Units (regional/local) dealing with land management issues.

Principles on the Training of Traditional Leaders and both local and commercial Communities

All Governmental institutions dealing with land management issues are responsible for providing education in the control of fires in land clearing activities in forest areas and generally in the safe use of fire and burning.

Activities

  1. Prepare and organize training in forest fire extension for forestry officers who will become the future trainers. This can be coordinated by Ogongo Agricultural College which can provide the necessary pedagogical input.
  2. Identify and recruit (together with local community leaders) appropriate community members to be trained as Forest Fire Contractors. This training includes: basic time keeping, accounting, fire prevention and the construction of cut-lines (fuel breaks ) by the use of fire. Train the local people in IFFM activities in communities which are contracted
    by D.o.F.
  3. Provide contracted communities with appropriate tools for fire line construction
  4. Establish close ties with local arts and craft associations (like the Caprivi Arts and Cultural Association (CACA) whose members depend on the availability of wood and non-wood forest products. Establish an extension network through their members.
  5. Prepare basic training programs and appropriate extension materials for local communities to enhance their awareness as to the importance of forest resources. This includes: Billboards (English and local languages), posters, car stickers, newsletters and video.
  6. Develop Fire Drama Plays with local units (Community Theatres) of the National Theatre of Namibia (NTN). Involve the Chief Cultural Officer in each region to support the Forest Fire Extension work.
  7. Cooperate closely with the Ministry of Basic Education and Culture (MBEC) in carrying out fire education in local schools for students and their teachers. Develop appropriate materials for school children and also for Adult Learners in literacy programs in rural areas.
  8. Cooperate closely with local Media and the Namibia Broadcasting Corporation (NBC) in developing Forest Fire Education material for radio listeners.
  9. Increase knowledge of Integrated Forest Fire Management by participating in national environmental competitions e.g. by competitions in fire drama plays or drawing competitions among school children.
  10. Establish demonstration plots where various levels of prescribed fires fire has been applied for the education of the public.

Principles on the Influence of Traditional Authorities and Spiritual Leaders

Residents in local communities often have traditionally in-learned attitudes and values regarding the surrounding trees and forest. These attitudes and the local environmental behaviour often influence the way they perceive forest protection issues. Local communities are influenced by their traditional leaders, thus these leaders can (if properly motivated) assist the Directorate of Forestry in disseminating forest fire management issues.

Activities

  1. Identify and recruit traditional community leaders and spiritual leaders as cadres in promoting the needs to protect the forest. Develop a program which includes both incentives and penalties.
  2. Prepare, produce and present training material in forest fire management for traditional authorities, community leaders and local farmers. This material (like the Fire Cartoon, Newsletters and posters) may then further be used by them, as guides in providing additional information to the local communities.
  3. Provide local communities with extension materials on Integrated Forest Fire Management to enhance their awareness regarding the environment and the effects of fire.
  4. Provide Tourists and the General public with information on forest fires (e.g. stickers, posters, billboards) the benefits of avoiding wild fires in the forest. This includes every day activities like e.g. smoking, camping, hunting or other recreational activities.


Principles on the Education of NGOs, POs and Women Groups

NGOs, POs and women groups can provide effective and appropriate assistance in developing the awareness and need for a continuous forest fire management program.

Activities

  1. Develop and organize courses for NGOs, POs and leaders of women groups so that they can participate in the management program for forest fires. Include information on the impacts of wild fires to the ecosystem and the benefits of reducing wild fires in their communities
  2. Assist local Women Grass cutting Groups in the protection of their resource and provide training for the women in prescribed burning.
  3. Develop and produce suitable forest fire management material for Adult Learning programs and especially for literacy classes where 68 % of the learners are women.
  4. Develop a fire safety program for women working within their homesteads. This includes thatch roofs, inflammable materials, construction of fuel breaks around houses and fields with growing crops.

5.2 Public Education/National Campaign

Principles on Public Education on the Use and Impact of Fire

These educational activities will lead to Increased knowledge of changes in climate and habitat due to forest destruction by burning and also give guidance into what impact applied research may have on field activities in local communities:
Between 1996 and 1999 some local people in eastern Caprivi were wondering why some large cleared forest areas did receive abnormal rains during rainy season. This question was often raised by traditional leaders. Little did they know about of the sharp increase in soil temperatures of up to 10°C, when forests are burned, compared with unburned areas.
Although the issue about the rising temperature is very complex, one may relate this increase to solar radiation. The darker the soil, the more it will absorb heat. Lighter colours will reflect the incoming sun light more effectively.

Increase in soil temperatures:

  • The increase in soil temperature over burned areas causes irregularities in rainfall. Large tree-less clearings may become so called rain-shadow areas.
  •   Areas covered by trees transmit up to 10,000 litres/ha/year more water compared to plain grass cover (research published by Commonwealth Forestry Association).
  • The local implication among communal farmers is to clear more land for cultivation to avoid these “rainless” pieces of land. This leads to more denudation of remaining forest cover.

New findings about the role of trees:

  • Recent long term research carried out in Hyytiala, Finland reveals that; growing trees have a protective mechanism against too intense solar radiation, they emit aerosols into the air.
  • The research shows that aerosols have a shorter lifespan than the surrounding CO2 particles, likewise their effect is more localized.
  •   In reality this means that when trees continuously discharge ozone and other particles above and around itself, this has a cooling effect on solar radiation into that area. This also implies that soil temperatures around trees are cooler than in surrounding soils even without the effect of the shadow of the tree itself.

In summing up:

Large treeless areas (caused by anthropogenic activities) in arid regions often become so called “rain-shadows”. This implies that due to the increased soil temperatures, the major rainfall tends to cover areas with lesser soil temperatures i.e. adjacent areas still covered by trees. Some frequently burned areas may gradually turn into desert, especially around the Kalahari basin.
Any local Community may suffer losses from forest fires in the form of property and income losses, material losses, loss of medicines and food, loss of “mielies” and other crops, personal safety, sustainability of forest ecosystem, uneven distribution of rainfall due to forest destruction. The Government together with NGOs and other interested parties are responsible to organize general education to communities in the safe use of fire. Education will be more effective when given at an early age to school children and youth.

Activities

  1. Establish and enhance cooperation between all Ministries dealing with land management issues as well as with the Ministry of Basic Education, Sports and Culture (MBESC) so the school curricula at all levels will reflect the importance of forest fire management.
  2. Support involvement of non-governmental institutions (NGOs) and other civic groups like the Farmers Union in Caprivi (LIKWAMA) the Caprivi Arts and Cultural Association (CACA), in public awareness campaign on the importance of forests and the protection of them.
  3. Following the Arts and Cultural Policy Statement: Artists shall be required to advocate the need for protecting the environment. Further, they shall be required to mobilize the public to preserve and safeguard the environment.
  4. Use media to provide information to communities on the underlying causes, impacts and management of forest fires. The success of the Forest Fire Campaign depends on the selection of appropriate National Fire Symbol (the Fire Ostrich), slogans to increase the public’s understanding. Seek cooperation with as many stakeholder groups as possible in the implementation of the Fire Campaign.
  5. Provide fire and environmental education, about fire management issues; negative as well as positive, to local schools and their teachers.
  6. Publish booklets on forest fire management and its effect upon basic ecology and the economics of controlling fires in a sustainable way.
  7. Develop suitable material for public education e.g. erect billboards along most important routes (in local languages) organize fire education for the public on open markets etc.
  8. Appropriate national or sub-national education agencies should incorporate peatland curricula in educational programs particularly in areas where peatlands form a significant component of the landscape under both forested and non-forested ecosystems. Such curricula should feature the ecological and cultural functions and values of peatlands as well as their importance to people including traditional knowledge based on input from local communities, women and local healers.

Country Notes
IFFN No. 25

24. November 2017/by GFMCadmin

Namibia Round Table on Fire, Windhoek, 10-11 November 1999

na

Namibia Round Table on Fire
Windhoek, 10-11 November 1999

(IFFN No. 25, July 2001)

3.1 Breakout Group 1: Government Co-ordination

The breakout group agreed to proceed as follows:

  1. Identify areas, institutions (current/potential) & stakeholder groups as “service providers”
  2. Brainstorm activities by priorities
  3. Tie activities to lead agencies
  4.  Identify legal, institutional, policy implications & constraints
  5. Prepare  a time table, distribution of financing among local institutions/ foreign donors

Table 1 provides a list of issues and/or resources to be addressed by a national fire policy and the responsibilities of government institutions and NGOs to take responsibility or lead in implementing, monitoring or enforcing a national policy.

List of Activities

  1. Collate, analyze existing information on sound fire management practices  including references to traditional land management systems.
  2. Initiate, analyze and publicize targeted research to fill gaps (e.g. biodiversity, climate)
  3. Identify perceptions and needs of different service providers and stakeholders
  4. Establish a National Fire Forum
  5. Promulgate a policy including legislative framework for fire management
  6. Design and implement an output oriented national fire monitoring system which serves national as well as international (global) obligations (e.g. CBC, CCD, UNFCC, ISDR Interagency Task Force [IDNDR successor arrangement]).
  7. Develop participatory guidelines for appropriate fire management
  8.  Develop and implement public awareness campaign to serve land users, service providers & general public.
  9. Identify training needs + opportunities for land users and service providers, and train priority candidates
  10. Establish a locally applicable fire danger rating system

Tab. 1. Resources and issues to be addressed by a national Namibian Fire Policy

Resource / Issue

Service Provider

(main players in bold)

A. Fodder, Grazing

MAWRD, MET, NLRR, MRLGH, NAU, NNFU

B. Firewood, Timber

    (Permit and Control)

MET, D.o.F., DRM, D.o.T., NBP,MAWRD, MME, MTI, DWA, MRLGH

C. Biological Diversity / Resources

MET (NBP, DRM, DoF, DoT), MAWRD, MBEC, (NMN) MFMR, MTI, MOHSS, MHA (NamPol), UNAM/PoN, MHEVTST

D. Public Health, Pollution, Natural Disasters

MOHSS, MoLabour, DWA, MET

E. Environmental Degradation, Resource Depletion

  •  loss of biodiversity
  • soil erosion
  • desertification/bush encroachment
  •   loss of forest cover, no regeneration of forests,
  • other disturbance issues

MET, MAWRD

MLRR, MBEC, NPC

F. Emissions / Climate Change

MET (DEA, DoF.), MFA, MOHSS, NPC

G. Disasters / Wildfires

OPM, MOD, MET, MRLGH, MOHSS

H. Food + Agriculture / Management                      (e.g., use of fire , clearing)    

MAWRD, MET, NPC

I. Training, Research, and Monitoring

MBEC, MHEVTST, (UNAM-PON), MRLGH

J. Public Awareness, Public Education, Dissemination of Information

MAWRD, MET, MIB, (DRFN, NNFU, NAU) Rossing, NNF, DAPP, IRDNC, NNFC, Churches, NPC, NBC

 List of Acronyms Used in Table 1

A. Fodder / Grazing

MAWRD: Ministry of Agriculture, Water & Rural Development

MET: Ministry of Environment & Tourism

MLRR: Ministry of Lands, Resettlement & Rehabilitation

MRLGH: Ministry of Regional & Local Government & Housing

NAU: Namibian Agricultural Union

NNFU: Namibian National Farmers’ Union

B. Firewood or Timber

DoF: Directorate of Forestry

DRM: Directorate of Resource Management

DoT: Directorate of Tourism

NBP: National Biodiversity Programme

MME: Ministry of Mines & Energy

MTI: Ministry of Trade & Industry

DWA: Department of Water Affairs

C. Biological Diversity / Resources

MBEC (NMN): Ministry of Basic Education & Culture, National Museum of Namibia

MFMR: Ministry of Fisheries & Marine Resources

MOHSS: Ministry of Health & Social Services

MHA (NamPol): Ministry of Home Affairs (Namibian Police)

UNAM: University of Namibia PoN: Polytechnic of Namibia

MHEVTST: Ministry of Higher Education, Vocational Training, Science & Technology

D. Public Health, Pollution, Natural Disasters

MoL: Ministry of Labour

E. Environmental Degradation / Resource Depletion

MBEC: Ministry of Basic Education & Culture

NPC: National Planning Commission

F. Emissions / Climate Change

DEA: Directorate of Environmental Affairs

MFA: Ministry of Foreign Affairs

G. Disasters / Wildfires

OPM: Office of the Prime Minister, Emergency Unit

MoD: Ministry of Defence

H. Food and Agriculture

MAWRD: Ministry of Agriculture, Water & Rural Development

MET: Ministry of Environment & Tourism

NPC: National Planning Commission

I. Training, Research and Monitoring

MBEC: Ministry of Basic Education & Culture

UNAM-PoN: University of Namibia – Polytechnic of Namibia

MHEVTST: Ministry of Higher Education, Vocational Training, Science & Technology

MRLGH: Ministry of Regional & Local Government & Housing

J. Public Awareness

MAWRD: Ministry of Agriculture, Water & Rural Development

MIB: Ministry of Information & Broadcasting

DRFN: Desert Research Foundation of Namibia Rossing: Rossing Foundation

NNF: Namibia Nature Foundation

DAPP: Danish Action People to People

IRDNC: Integrated Rural Development & Nature Conservation

NNFC: Northern Namibia Forestry Council

NBC: Namibian Broadcasting Corporation

Tab. 2. Priority steps for implementation activities listed above

Activity

Lead

Agency /

Program

Timeframe

Instrument and possible source of finance

4.

DoF

Now ongoing, inception by 1/2000

Establishment by 11/2000

 

NFFP Þ GRN 04/2003

5.

DoF

1997; Policy in place 11/2000

Legislation by 04/2001

NFFP Þ GRN

FAO

1.

DoF

1996

11/2000 key participants informed and analyses completed

 

NFFP Þ GRN 04/2003

2.

DoF

Analysis of gaps 12/2000

Research, analysis, literature; ongoing

NFFP/GRN + donor sources 04/2001

NFF to seek financing through donors, GRN and levies

6.

 

10.

DoF

 

DoF

1999 ongoing

 

Fire Danger Rating System by 12/2001

NFFP + GRN 04/2001

NFFP + GRN 04/2001

3.

 

7.

DoF +

MAWRD

DoF +

MAWRD

1999 ongoing

 

Now Þ  12/2000

NFFP + GRN 04/2001

NFFP

8.

DoF

Þ NFFP

Current and ongoing

Handing over to NFF by 11/2000

NFFP

NFFP Þ NFF

by 11/2000

9.

DoF

Þ NFFP

Training needs assessed for fire ecology and fire management by 06/2000

 

NFFP Þ NFF

by 11/2000


|

| Country Notes |

24. November 2017/by GFMCadmin

Namibia Round Table on Fire, Windhoek, 10-11 November 1999

na

Namibia Round Table on Fire
Windhoek, 10-11 November 1999

(IFFN No. 25, July 2001)


3.2 Breakout Group 2: Stakeholder Co-ordination

The Development of an intersectoral fire management programme for Namibia requires a high degree of co-ordination efforts between the different sectors of the society represented by government agencies (see Breakout Group 1), non-government institutions and interest groups, and stakeholders to be involved.

The group discussed the state of fire knowledge, technology transfer, institutional capacities in fire management in Namibia.

3.2.1. Current Status Of Fire Management In Namibia

3.2.1.1 Information

  • Etosha burning guidelines and regulations for nature conservation are based on long-term ecological research and fulfil the requirements of advanced ecosystem and fire management
  • No guidelines are available for commercial farming areas
  • Guidelines are available for communal areas in the Forest Act but are currently not applied because the Act does not conform with present socio-cultural conditions
  • Guidelines in the new Forest Act include all sectors

Lack of burning policy. Such a policy is needed for the prescription of fire or fire regimes in accordance with the need for burning in various land-use systems and wildlands, e.g. burning moribund grasses, control of bush encroachment, stimulation of forest regeneration, etc.

Elements to be considered in burning:

  1. reasons for burning
  2. appropriate fire regimes
    • type of fire
    • intensity of fire
    • season of burning
    • frequency of burning
    • manpower & equipment
  1. management after burning
  2. assessment of traditional burning practices
  3. impacts on biodiversity
  4. fire information systems

Stakeholders to be involved in policy development:

  1. Ministry of Agriculture, Water & Rural Development

  • Research division
  • Extension division
  • Veterinary services
  1. Ministry of Environment and Tourism

  • DoF, DEA, DRM

  1. Ministry of Regional, Local Government and Housing

  • Regional governor’s offices
  • Established procedures exist for fire safety but prescriptions lacking
  • Availability of free satellite information access (NOAA/AVHRR) from Harare, Zimbabwe
  • Problems; lack of techniques to assess and monitor fire effects
  • Legislation governing the use of fire
  • Lack of quantitative data on fire effects
  • Accessibility of unpublished data on fire management and effects

3.2.1.2.  Communication

  • Lack of communication channels of relevant information to all stakeholders (electronic system).
  • High level endorsement at ministerial level is required to build up a communication network

3.2.1.3.  National responsibilities

National responsibilities need to be defined to guide, co-ordinate and implement a broad range of tasks within a nationally harmonized fire management strategy. The

  1. Coordination
    • who is responsible for overall national co-ordination
  2. Who is responsible
    • for policy
    • for training
    • for liaison
    • for sensitization
    • for extension
    • for fire management burning policy
    • for extinguishing fire

The key stakeholder to be involved in sharing responsibilities are:

  • Commercial farmers (commercial farming areas)
  • Community leaders/tribal-traditional authorities(communal lands)
  • Private landowners (municipalities)
  • Service providers (national parks)
  • Fire brigades (urban areas)
  • Tourism sector
  • Relevant research institutions
  • Educational institutions
  • Relevant NGOs

3.2.1.4.  Research and Training

Research and training must address the most urgent and immediate needs of the country. It has been recognized that the wealth of fundamental knowledge in fire science as well as existing technologies and procedures in fire management must be transferred to the user level. The focus should be on:

  • Problem-oriented research
  • Research on developing techniques for assessing and monitoring fire effects by field based remote sensing
  • Intergrative sectoral research
  • Training i.a.w. the needs to be defined
  •  Capacity building of existing staff
  • Practical training courses in fire management
  • Exchange of extensionists in SADC
  • Co-ordination of syllabi on fire management at national training institutions
  • Public awareness campaign
  • Exploring funding possibilities within GRN & donors

3.2.1.5.  International co-operation

The transboundary fire issues affecting Namibia and its neighbours require a strong co-operation with the neighbouring countries, the SADC community and international partners. Main emphasis should be given on:

  • Transboundary meeting to involve all stakeholders
  • Reactivation of the SADC protocol on fire management, 1996
  • SADC and bilateral agreements
  • Magnitude of crossboundary fires
  • Magnitude of crossboundary air pollution
  • Procedures for containing cross-border fires
  • SAFARI 2000 research
  • Connect Namibia with international fire information network via the Global Fire Monitoring Center (GFMC)
  • Organization of workshops with international inputs
  •  Identification of best fire management practices within the region

3.2.1.6.  Finance

  • For financing institution and capacity building and implementation of a national fire management policy commitments are required by the government of Namibia and the international community.  Priority must be given to
  • work towards economic independence at all levels to create sustainable funding

International funding sources need to be explored through:

  • Donors, e.g. IUCN, WWF, GEF, GFMC, FAO, EU
  • NGOs
  •  Business enterprises (PPP – Public-Private Partnerships)
  •  Exploit opportunities such as E.I.F.
  • Seek partners for carbon trade

3.2.1.7.  Evaluation and Feedback

An efficient monitoring and evaluating capacity must be built in Namibi. It is recommended that the National Fire Forum should:

  • Monitor and review/evaluate fire management Programmes
  • Establish systems/channels for monitoring and evaluation of fire management activities including bush encroachment, climate change, employment generation through the control of e.g. transboundary fires.

4. Conclusions and Recommendations

The national Namibian Round Table on Fire was an important kick-off event to initiate a national fire management strategy and programme in which all sectors of the society concerned will actively participate.

From the very beginning the Round Table was not designed to elaborate the details of a national fire programme. The report, which includes the recommendations arising from the breakout groups and the Round Table plenary, represent the opinions and visions of the most important government and non-government institutions and stakeholders.

It is now most urgent to follow up the recommendations by priority. Highest ranking priority is the establishment of a national fire forum which will provide the continuation of the spirit of a Round Table in which all stakeholders will jointly share responsibility.

References

In this list only the quoted literature sources are provided. For more background information: see the reports by Goldammer (1998) and Trollope and Trollope (1999).

Goldammer, J. G. 1998. Development of a National Fire Policy and Guidelines on Fire Management in Namibia. Namibia-Finland Forestry Programme, Directorate of Forestry, Ministry of Environment and Tourism, Windhoek. Revised Draft (18 October 1998).

Kromhout, C. 1999. Proposed Cooperative Fire Management in the SADC Countries of Southern Africa. Int. Forest Fire News No. 21, 22-24.

International Tropical Timber Organization (ITTO). 1997. ITTO Guidelines on Fire Management in Tropical Forests. ITTO Policy Development Series No.6. ITTO, Yokohama, 40 p.

Swap, R. 1999. The Southern African Regional Science Initiative ‑ SAFARI 2000. Int. Forest Fire News No. 21, 28-34.

Trollope W. S. W., and L. A. Trollope. 1999. Technical review of the Integrated Forest Fire Management component of the Namibia-Finland Forestry Programme in the East Caprivi Region of Namibia. Windhoek – Fort Hare, August 1999.

This report has been prepared in the frame of the Namibia-Finland Forestry Programme, Directorate of Forestry, Ministry of Environment and Tourism, Windhoek, Namibia (December 1999) by

Johann G. Goldammer

Global Fire Monitoring Center (GFMC)
Max Planck Institute for Chemistry, Biogeochemistry Department
c/oFreiburg University, PO Box
79100 Freiburg
Germany

 

The ostrich in Namibia’s fire prevention logo represents a species that is endangered by excessive wildfires


|

| Country Notes |

24. November 2017/by GFMCadmin

Namibia Round Table on Fire, Windhoek, 10-11 November 1999

na

Namibia Round Table on Fire
Windhoek, 10-11 November 1999

(IFFN No. 25, July 2001)


1. Rationale and Introduction

In his opening speech Mr. TangeniErkana, Permanent Secretary, Ministry of Environment and Tourism, laid thefoundations of the Namibia Round Table on Fire for the preparation of a nationalfire policy for the country.
On behalf of the Ministry ofEnvironment and Tourism, I warmly welcome the participants to this two-dayworkshop.
As befits this occasion, I wish toreiterate the mission of the Ministry of Environment and Tourism, which isrooted in the philosophy of sustainable management of our natural resources, ina manner that is environmentally sound. In regard to this, all the policies andpieces of legislation in this ministry support this philosophy.
With forest fires as a point ofreference, I have noted that the current draft Forest Bill provides forFire Management Committees in wooded areas and gives the minister powers todeclare Fire Seasons and prohibit specific activities in forested lands whencurrent Fire Danger Ratings necessitateit.
In the attempts by the Government ofNamibia to adopt the organised and systematic management of fire in landmanagement, we should be motivated by the following facts:

  •  It is estimated that 3-5 million hectares (ha)of forests, bush and grasslands are burned every year in Namibia. Despite this alarming magnitude, no systematic and nationwidefire extension work has been carried out, except in pilot areas such as theCaprivi and more recently the Kavango Regions.

Traditionally, burning is considered anecessary activity before each rainy season to renew grass for grazing purposesand also for the preparation of land for cultivation. Furthermore, no nationallyrecognized policy on fire management is available.

  • Uncontrolled burning is also resulting inconsiderable economic losses throughdamage to valuable and non timber resources, loss of grazing and consequentincreased life stock and wildlife mortality, all of which are to the detrimentof the local and national economies .

  • Internationally, the concern is that extensiveburning of forests and grasslands is contributing directly to the anthropogenicgreenhouse effect and therebyinfluencing global climate change. It is argued that widespread fires in thewooded areas are reducing the overall phytomass or vegetation, thereby causing arelease of radiatively active trace gases and aerosols into the regional and global atmosphere.

  • From the recent case of extensive forest firesin Indonesia, it is now appreciated that gases from such fires cause untoldrespiratory and other illnesses.

  •  It is also true that, just as the effects offires on ecosystems are many, the causes are also from a variety of sources,hence the need for wide consultations in formulating a policy are essential andcrucial.

 Because of the above local andglobal concerns, the Government of Namibia entered into an agreement with theGovernment of Finland to implement a project, which was at the beginning, knownas the Fire Control Project in Caprivi which started in 1996. ThisProject was more recently renamed the IntegratedFire Management Project with the realisation that fire is a legitimateland management tool, if carefully timed and used. It is therefore important forNamibia as a nation to distinguish between the legitimate and organised use offire as opposed to the intentional abuse of fires which often have destructiveconsequences.

After three years of theimplementation of the integrated fire management project in the Caprivi, theevaluation of recent satellite imageries suggest that there has been a steadydecrease in the frequency and extent of burning in the region. Despite thispleasing trend, uncontrolled fires are still to be found in the Caprivi, bothwithin the Communal farming areas and in the protected national parks.

It is also a telling point this year,that the commercial harvesting of thatching grass by rural communities, is becoming a major industry in the NorthEastern part of Namibia. To sustain the economic benefits of such commercialharvesting, the careful management of fire is required. However, this is but oneof the benefits of managing fire.

A major dilemma is that as firesrage through our woodlands and grasslands every dry season, no one clearly takesresponsibility, especially if it happens on public and communal lands. Tocomplicate matters further, most of these fires stem from agriculturalactivities related to cultivation and traditional range practices. In addition,others are started by hunters who often do not stop to consider the widerconsequences of the fires when they spread, as they often do. Arsonists who bumfor the sheer pleasure of it are a special and unfortunate source.

The various causes and sources offire therefore demand that its management be an issue of public concern and mustinvolve all sectors of government which are concerned with land management andalso education. For this reason, the Ministry of Environment and Tourism haschosen merely to act as a catalyst to provoke debate at a national level on theplanned and safe use and if need be, the prevention of fire from specified areasof our region. We invite non-governmental organisations (NGOs) to activelysupport our efforts in this regard.

The ministry is delighted to notethat several Government Ministries and NGOs are in attendance at this workshop.It is also encouraging that experts and policy makers from neighbouring SADCcountries are also going to participate in this workshop. I extend a specialwelcome to them.

Furthermore it is quite encouragingthat some consultants who have done some work for us on fire management aregoing to make presentations. We value your international experience andencourage you to exchange ideas with us and above all, to stimulate our thinkingin formulating a well worked-out and researched document on fire management thatcan be implemented by Namibians.

We recognise that fires also know nointernational boundaries and often cross our borders with neighbouring countries.It is hence extremely important that a national fire policy considers crossborder management issues.

In conclusion, this ministry will bekeen to have the workshop consider a number of issues and challenges. Theseinclude:

  • the formulation of policies that enable widecommunity participation in the responsible custodianship of natural resourcesthrough the wise use of fire.

  • the need for a common philosophy acrossgovernment ministries regarding fire use and the sharing of responsibility forits management the development of joint strategies that are accepted and fused

  • with national and international initiativessuch as the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) andthe Criteria and Indicators for Sustainable Forest Management

  • the promotion of decentralized systems of firecontrol to give more responsibility to regional governments, who must be seen toassist the central government in activities such as rangeland management

  • the harmonization of sectoral pieces oflegislation to reflect a common philosophy

  •  the possible development of regional orbilateral protocols to deal with cross-border fire issues just as much we arenow encouraging the concept of trans-boundary conservation areas in the SADCregion.

After saying the above, it isappropriate to the occasion to extend my ministry’s sincere gratitude to theGovernment of Finland for providing the technical support and the funds to runthe Namibia-Finland Forestry Programme, of which the Fire Component is a part.

I wish you the very best in yourdeliberations and look forward to a milestone policy paper in the not toodistant future. I now declare this workshop open and I thank you.

2. Preparation of the Round Table

In early 1998 the Namibia-FinlandForestry Programme was supported by the Fire Ecology Research Group which in thesame year established the Global Fire Monitoring Center (GFMC). One of the mainaims of the GFMC is to facilitate countries, the UN system and otherinternational organizations, including NGOs, in developing fire scienceprogrammes, technology transfer to fire management and policy development (see: <http://www.uni-freiburg.de/fireglobe>).In consultation with the Research Group / GFMC is was proposed to develop a”National Fire Policy and Guidelines on Fire Management in Namibia(Goldammer 1998). The following paragraphs are extracted from the 1998 reportand updated where necessary.

2.1 Fire in Namibia: History, Useand Problems

In the evolutionary history naturalfires caused by lightning have significantly contributed to shape Namibia’ssavanna and forest ecosystems. In addition, fire influence through traditionalburning practices over millennia has strongly favoured and selected plantcommunities that are considered to be sustainable and long-term stable fireecosystems if not affected by additional disturbances.

However, in the recent past fireregimes are undergoing dramatic changes. This is the consequence of decline innomadic life and the overall increasing human population pressure on these areaswhere fire is being used extensively as a land utilization tool, e.g., forconversion of forested/wooded lands into agricultural lands; for maintaininggrazing lands; and for facilitating the utilization of non-wood forest products,e.g. honey collection and hunting. Formerly sustainable time-space-firerelationships are being altered in the wake of changing land-use practices.Forest ecosystem and site degradation becomes most visible where excessivedisturbances by logging have changed the equilibrium between vegetationcomposition (tree species, occupation of sites by invading grasses), fuelcharacteristics (available flammable material), and fire behaviour. One of themain reasons of degradation is the increase of wind and water erosion of theKalahari sand soils. As a consequence, ecological damages and loss ofbiodiversity become more and more visible. High economic losses are caused byfire damaging valuable timber and non-timber resources, natural regeneration,and planted forests. Indiscriminate burning in Namibia’s forests and grazinglands has also led to increasing losses in pastoral resources and losses ofdomestic livestock. Fires in the interface of wildlands and residential areasoften cause the loss of human lives, property, and other values at risk, e.g.,food stores, power and communication lines, other infrastructures, andlivelihoods.

In addition, large-scale burning ofvegetation exerts impacts on the regional and global atmosphere. Emissions fromwildland fires in Namibia are important sources of radiatively active tracegases and aerosols. Those fires which are associated with the degradation ofvegetative cover consequently lead to the reduction of the carbon sequestrationpotential. Thus, they contribute directly to the anthropogenic greenhouse effect.

Altogether, the current levels ofwildfire occurrence and severity are seen as incompatible with the nation’ssocial goals and resource management objectives.

This proposal to develop Guidelineson Fire Management in Namibia is aimed to provide the basis for an in-depthpreparation of a set of guidelines for the various administrative settings andecosystems concerned. Major emphasis in this proposal is on fire prevention,particularly on a community-based approach.

2.2 Crosscutting / Intersectoral andInternational Issues

This report seeks cross-referencesto various national regulations and strategic plans. The proposal is alsoconsidering regional plans for the Southern African region and internationalbinding and non-binding conventions.

2.2.1 The Namibia Forestry StrategicPlan

The Namibia Forestry Strategic Plan(Directorate of Forestry 1996) provides the framework for fire policy andmanagement planning. The Strategic Plan is based on ecological, environmental,cultural, and socio-economic considerations. The Plan considers “Production,Protection and Participation” as the three imperatives of forest policy.

In this context, the planunderscores the need of reducing the negative effects of fires by stating inSection 3.2.1 that

“The occurrence andseverity of uncontrolled and accidental forest fires has to be reduced, and thepolicy of burning off patches of woodlands to improve hunting grounds, should bechanged to one using fire only as a controlled tool under specific circumstances”.

Furthermore it is stated in Section3.2.4 that

“Participation of localcommunities and the private sector is essential for the sustainable use of theforest resources. The active involvement of local communities in management andconservation of forest resources is desirable for the purposes of environmentalprotection and for significant increases in rural incomes and employment levels.”

Besides the statement, that “Policyformulation must precede the formulation of forest legislation” (Section3.3.1) it is also underscored that “there is no reason why differentregions in Namibia should not adopt different policies” – an importantstatement which will open the options for the development of fire policies whichare in accordance with the distinctly different impacts of fire (or fire regimes)in the various vegetation types of the country.

Under the expected contribution ofthe programmes towards the achievement of sectoral and national objectives (Section5) the environmental forestry programme underscores that

“Strategic forestprotection of biodiversity and sequestering of carbon (to restrict potentialclimate change) will make possible for Namibia to meet the requirements of theInternational Conventions on Biodiversity and Climate Change.”

The Namibia Climate Change Reportmust be seen in this context (see para 2.4).

2.2.2 Forest Act, Forest Ordinance,and Regulations under the Forest Act

The Forest Act No.72 of 1968provides some brief procedural regulations on clearing of fire belts and rulesof fire control. The Preservation of Trees and Forest Ordinance, assented to 8July 1952[1],regulates the use of fire in construction of fire belts and assistance in firesuppression. The new Forest Act of Namibia (which is in preparation) willprovide rules on fire management. The Final Draft of the Regulations under thenew Forest Act of Namibia shall provide several regulations concerning fire,namely on access and connecting roads in forest reserves and on the composition,functions and procedures of fire management committees.

2.2.3 Other Regulations of theMinistry for Agriculture, Water and Rural Development, Ministry for Environmentand Tourism, and the Department of Women’s Affairs

At the time of writing the 1998report no statements could be found regarding fire policies, rules orregulations under the responsibility of the Ministry for Agriculture, Water andRural Development. The Ministry of Local Governments and Housing in a policystatement (not formally decided by the Cabinet) has taken over theresponsibility for rural fire control.

The Directorate of EnvironmentalAffairs, Ministry for Environment and Tourism, has clearly indicated that itwill support future intersectoral policies in fire management.

The Office of the President,Department of Women’s Affairs has finalized the National Gender Policy in 1998.In Section “Gender and the Management of the Environment” emphasis hasbeen given on the role of women in protecting the environment. Although firemanagement has not yet bee mentioned explicitly in that section it is expectedthat more detailed activity programmes will include a fire component.

2.2.4 UNConvention on Climate Change

Namibia in 1995 has ratified theUnited Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC). Consequently,Namibia submitted a report detailing its contributions and its vulnerability toclimate change to the Secretariat of the Framework Convention on Climate Change.The inventory of contributions to climate change includes emissions from theagricultural sector, notably those from land-use changes and vegetation fires.Thus, from the point of view of this binding international convention, Namibiais required to provide quantitative assessments of free-burning vegetation fires.

The mitigation strategies are animportant part of the Climate Change Report. A national fire management policyand a derived fire management strategy, as proposed by this report, consequentlywill have an important focus on the reduction of those fires which aredetrimental not only from the point of view of protection of ecosystems,biodiversity, and productivity, but also in regard to contributing to regionaland global changes of atmosphere and climate.

2.2.5 The UN International Decade onNatural Disaster Reduction (IDNDR)

The development of a national firepolicy and guidelines on fire management are in accordance with the UNResolution 44/236 in which the 1990’s were designated as the InternationalDecade on Natural Disaster Reduction (IDNDR). The basic idea behind thisproclamation of the Decade was and still remains to be the unacceptable andrising levels of losses which disasters continue to incur on the one hand, andthe existence, on the other hand, of a wealth of scientific and engineeringknow-how which could be effectively used to reduce losses resulting fromdisasters. The general objective of the Decade (which ends in 1999) was:

to reduce through concertedinternational actions, especially in developing countries, loss of life,property damage and economic disruption caused by natural disasters such asearthquakes, windstorms, tsunamis, floods, landslides, volcanic eruptions, wildfiresand other calamities of natural origin such as grasshopper and locustinfestations.

The following four goals representthe desired destinations which Decadeefforts should lead to:

  1.  improve the capacity of each country to mitigate the effects of naturaldisasters expeditiously and effectively, paying special attention to assistingdeveloping countries in the assessment of disaster damage potential and in theestablishment of early warning systems and disaster-resistant structures whenand where needed;

  2. devise appropriate guidelines and strategies for applying existingscientific and technical knowledge, taking into account the cultural andeconomic diversity among nations;

  3. foster scientific and engineering endeavours aimed at closing criticalgaps in knowledge in order to reduce loss of life and property;

  4. develop measures for the assessment, prediction, prevention andmitigation of natural disasters through programmes of technical assistance andtechnology transfer, demonstration projects, and education and training,tailored to specific disasters and locations, and to evaluate the effectivenessof those programmes.

Based on the above broadly definedgoals, it was found necessary to focus on a number of specific areas ofactivities which would mark progress to be achieved at the end of the Decadeperiod.

By the year 2000, all countries, aspart of their plan to achieve sustainable development, should have in place:

  1.  comprehensive national assessments of risks from natural hazards, withthese assessments taken into account in development plans;

  2. mitigation plans at national and/or local levels, involving long-termprevention and preparedness and community awareness, and

  3. ready access to global, regional, national and local warning systems andbroad dissemination of warnings.

Namibia as a signatory country ofthe IDNDR has placed its National Committee of Namibia under the auspices of theOffice of the Prime Minister (Emergency Unit). In the information provided byNamibia’s national report to the IDNDR it was clearly stated that the countryconsidered wildfires to be a prevailing hazard.[2]

The development of a national firepolicy, fire management guidelines and management capabilities in Namibia willassist the government of Namibia to meet the targets set by the IDNDR. As theDecade will be terminated by end of December 1999, successor arrangements haveto be defined at national levels 

2.2.6 The Rome Declaration onForestry and the FAO Forest Resources Assessment 2000

TheFAO convened the Ministerial Meeting on Forestry on “Sustainability Issuesin Forestry, the National and International Challenges”, Rome, 8-9 March1999. On 9 March 1999 the Forest Ministers released the “Rome Declarationon Forestry”. The statements regarding forest fires are based on the resumée”Global Action to Address Forest Fires” which was a summary of therecommendations of the Expert Meeting on Public Policies Affecting Forest Fires(FAO, Rome, October 1998). The Ministerial Meeting, among other, welcomed therecommendations the Fourteenth Session of the Committee on Forestry (COFO) (Rome,2 March 1999) and encouraged their endorsement by the FAO Council with a view tofacilitating their early implementation.

In the RomeDeclaration on Forestry of 9 March 1999 the ministers responsible for forests ortheir representatives, among other:

  • notedthat the causes of forest fires are many and complex and recognizing the need toharness efforts to prevent forest fires as well as to address the multiplecauses and consequences of fires around the globe,

  • welcomedthe meeting on Public Policies Affecting Forest Fires hosted by FAO in October1998 and encourage FAO to take action to implement the recommendations directedto it,

  • calledon FAO and other international organizations, donor agencies and interestedcountries to work together to address the underlying causes of forest fires, toimprove the coordination of their efforts to prevent and combat forest fires andto rehabilitate affected areas with a view to providing assistance requested bygovernments,

Beginning with the Round Table onFire Namibia intends to implement the recommendations of the Rome Declaration.

It must also be mentioned thatNamibia must provide the fire statistical information to the FAO as required bythe Forest Resources Assessment 2000 (FRA 2000). In the frame of the FRA 2000the FAO collects data on the numbers of fires and area burned for the period1990‑99 for all wildfires or any fire occurring on forest and other woodedland. Like many countries Namibia must urgently build up technical and humanresource capabilities to conduct fire inventories on a regular base.

2.2.7 Regional Cooperation withinthe Southern African Development Community (SADC)

All member countries of the SouthernAfrican Development Community (SADC) have one unifying problem, among other, theproblems of changing fire regimes associated with population growth, land-usechanges, and land degradation. It is consequent that SADC came up with proposalson a regional Southern African wildfire management project. In 1992, duringdiscussions between representatives of the Forestry Sector Technical Co‑ordinationUnit (FSTCU) of SADC and USDA Forest Service, the possibility of a SADC‑wideregional forest fire management system was raised. This led to terms ofreference in 1994 for an investigation or review of the situation in eachcountry, a report on the findings and recommendations that were discussed at ameeting in Lusaka in November 1995, attended by representatives of 11 of thethen 12 SADC countries and by the project team, consisting of experts from theUnited States and Canada. The review was sponsored by the United StatesDepartment of Agriculture Forest Service and the Canadian InternationalDevelopment Agency (CIDA). A follow-up report was produced in February 1996.This report contains recommendations leading to project proposals which arepresented in some detail. A list of recommendations contained in the follow‑upreport was provided by Kromhout (1999) and is given below.

SADC‑Wide Recommendations

Chapter 3 of the SADC RegionalForest Fire Management System Review report details the followingrecommendations:

  1.  All resource management agencies involved with a fire responsibility needto adopt a proactive attitude to fire management. As a first step, a positionshould be dedicated to fire management at the national level and preferably atthe regional and project levels as well. The establishment of these positionswill provide accountability for the fire management program.                                                                                                Þ Status: accepted in principle by member states attending a workshop in Lusaka, Zambia,                                  21-23 November1995.

  1. SADC members should commit to building cooperative fire managementarrangements with each other in order to accomplish their fire managementobjectives, as opposed to “going it alone”. These arrangements shouldinclude sharing of resources, operational understandings on common border zones,joint participation in training initiatives, research and technology, andinformation exchange.                                                                                         ÞStatus: accepted in principle by member states attending the workshop in Lusaka,Zambia, November 1995,      and further developed in Project Proposal No.1.

  1. FSTCU should arrange for a team to visit Angola to gather informationregarding their fire management situation which could be included in an updatedversion of this report.                                                                                ÞStatus: completed with FSTCU visit to Angola in August of 1995 and subsequentpublication of “Addendum         to the SADC Regional Forest Fire ManagementSystems Review Project” in November 1995.

  1. FSTCU should convene a meeting of SADC country forestry, national parkand wildlife representatives to review this report and to chart a course forimplementation of the Project Proposals.                                                    ÞStatus: completed through workshop held in Lusaka, Zambia, 21-23 November 1995,attended by 11 of the      12 SADC member states.

  1. Following the meeting mentioned in above (No.4), SADC should consider theneed to develop a strategic action plan for implementing a fire managementprogram in Southern Africa.                                                                ÞStatus: to be addressed; accepted in principle at Lusaka workshop.

  1. In the absence of comprehensive data on fireoccurrence and extent at the national level in most countries, a regionalprogram should be developed to monitor and report vegetation loss to fire.                                            ÞStatus: accepted in principle at Lusaka workshop and further developed inProject

Proposal No.1.

 

SADC Regional Wildfire ManagementProject Proposals

Incorporating the direction andprioritization provided by the delegates to the Lusaka workshop, four ProjectProposals, each with several Modules, have been developed:

Regional Wildfire ManagementCoordination

Modules:

  • Wildfire Management Coordinating Group

  • Wildfire Management Specialist

  • Wildfire Monitoring and Assessment InformationSystem

  • Equipment Development and Acquisition

  •  International Wildfire Agreements

  • Wildfire Weather Data Network

Wildfire Personnel Training

Modules:

  • Basic Wildfire Suppression Training

  •  Forestry College Improvements

  • Mid-Career Internships

Wildfire Prevention and PublicEducation

Modules:

  • Wildfire Prevention Information Materials

  • Extension Training ‑ Wildfire Management

Operational Wildfire Research andTechnology Transfer

Modules:

  •  Prescribed Burning ‑ Miombo Woodlands

  • Operational Fire Management Research ‑Zambezi Teak Woodlands

  • Wildfire Management Demonstration Centres

After the proposal to USAID to fundthe implementation of the wildfire management proposals was declined. FSTCU isstill seeking assistance in implementing the projects that have been identified.Although donors dislike funding that cannot be taken over by the budgets ofrecipients, to avoid dependency, some of the projects are not of a kind to causedependency when funded by donors.

2.2.8 Recommendations by theInternational Tropical Timber Organization (ITTO) through the “Guidelineson Fire Management in Tropical Forests”

Between 1993 and 1997 theInternational Tropical Timber Organization (ITTO) developed “Guidelines onFire Management in Tropical Forests” (ITTO 1997). These fire managementguidelines are designed to provide a base for policy makers and managers atvarious levels to develop programs and projects in which the specific national,socio-economic, and natural problems related to fire in tropical natural andplanted forests will be addressed. The scope of the guidelines is to assist theITTO member countries (producer and consumer countries) to develop programs forreducing damage caused by fire; and to help tropical forest managers and ruralresidents to safely use and take advantage of the beneficial effects of fire inland-use systems. The guidelines recognize that many forest fires originate inthe agricultural and pastoral systems; and in degraded vegetation which isoutside of forests. Therefore, fire management on former and degraded forestlands may help to re-establish productive forests and to safeguard the successof reforestation programs.

At present, Indonesia is the firstcountry in which the general ITTO guidelines are “fine-tuned” to thenational level. However, the ITTO guidelines are not exclusively developed forthe ITTO Member Countries or the tropical countries sensu strictu.[3]The guidelines address principles which are also valid outside the ITTO region,especially in the less developed world of the subtropical and temperate zones.Namibia could certainly take advantage of ITTO’s precursor work when formulatinga national fire policy and fire management strategy.

2.3 Conclusions and Recommendations

It is clear that the various fireregimes and fire effects in forestry, wildlife conservancy and land-use ofNamibia will require a set of measures in fire management. The followingconclusions and recommendations require a coordinated national approach leadingto a clear fire policy and its implementation through a series of measureswithin the timeframe of 1998-2001.

Creation of an Inter-Agency RoundTable on Fire Management and Development of a National Fire Policy and FireManagement Guidelines

The various agencies and land ownersto be involved in the implementation of a national fire management program needto agree on clearly defined responsibilities, joint strategies and sharing ofresources. An inter-agency round table should be created as soon as possible.This could be initiated in a workshop, tentatively entitled “Development ofa National Fire Policy and Guidelines on Fire Management in Namibia”.Besides the agencies concerned, this workshop should involve NGOs, women’sgroups, the donor community, international programmes and representatives offire science and related fields.

The proposed objectives of theWorkshop are:

  1. to provide all parties represented in the workshop with comprehensiveinformation on the present status and problems in the field of vegetation firesand fire management in Namibia;

  2. to introduce a framework which can assist to guide and coordinatenational responsibilities and international assistance;

  3. to provide an opportunity for potential international partners to expresstheir interests and ideas with respect to a cooperation in the development of afunctioning Long-Term Integrated Forest Fire Management System in Namibia and abasic fire science program;

  4.  to define follow-up procedures of this international workshop.

 

Desirable results andrecommendations of the workshop:

  1. The development of a Long-TermIntegrated Forest Fire Management (IFFM) System for Namibia is recognized asa field of high priority in order to protect natural, socio-economic and humanresources from the detrimental effects of fires.

  2. A basic and most critical task will be to provide the necessary legal andorganizational base within the existing structures (Government administration,private sector) in order to strengthen or to create (where not yet available)the fire management capabilities.

  3. International contributions are essential (a) to secure the introductionof fire management methods adapted to the requirements of local political,social, and ecological conditions in Namibia; (b) to provide the fundingnecessary to build up expertise and infrastructures that will secure the mosttime-efficient build-up of fire management capabilities in the most criticalareas, and (c) to ensure the continuity of research inputs covering the

  4. Both the national (Namibian) and international activities require a highdegree of coordination because of the multi-sectoral approach and the multitudeof international partners being involved.

  5.  In order to ensure the efficient realization of the required activities aNational Fire Management Coordinating Committee needs to be established as afollow-up step.

 

Proposed terms of reference of aNational Fire Management Coordinating Committee:

  1.  to establish a national platform for the development of a Long-TermIntegrated Fire Management System;

  2. to ensure an intersectoral approach in which all Government authorities,other organizations and the private sector will participate;

  3.  to coordinate international support to the establishment of the firemanagement system in order to avoid duplications of activities and investmentsand to optimize the efficiency of contributions; international partners shall beconsulted for coordinating activities; and

  4.  if required, to develop the legal and organizational structure of apermanent body, e.g. a National Fire Management Council, which will ensure theefficiency and future continuity of this national program.

  5. Meeting Report

The Namibia Round Table on Fire wasconvened in Windhoek, 10-11 November 1999. A broad range of government agenciesand non-government organizations of Namibia, governments of neighbouring SADCcountries and the international forestry and fire science community wasrepresented by ca. 50 participants. In the first part of the Round Table thepresentations of representatives from Namibian, SADC and the internationalcommunity highlighted the background of fir history, the utilization of fire inland-use systems, the current magnitude of fire occurrence as depicted byspaceborne observations, the sustainable role of fire in certain savannawildlands and grazing ecosystems, the detrimental role of wildfires infire-susceptible forests of Namibia and its neighbours countries, and the impactof vegetation fire emissions on the local, regional, and global atmosphere.

After plenary discussion of basicaspects of a national fire policy two breakout working groups were formed in thesecond part of the Round Table. The groups

addressed the most urgent areas ofaction and co-ordination by government agencies and stakeholders. The resultsare summarized in the following.

3.1 Breakout Group 1: GovernmentCo-ordination

The breakout group agreed to proceedas follows:

  1. Identify areas, institutions (current/potential) & stakeholder groupsas “service providers”

  2. Brainstorm activities by priorities

  3. Tie activities to lead agencies

  4.  Identify legal, institutional, policy implications & constraints

  5. Prepare  a time table, distribution of financing among localinstitutions/ foreign donors

Table 1 provides a list of issuesand/or resources to be addressed by a national fire policy and theresponsibilities of government institutions and NGOs to take responsibility orlead in implementing, monitoring or enforcing a national policy.

List of Activities

  1. Collate, analyze existing information on sound fire management practices including references to traditional land management systems.

  2. Initiate, analyze and publicize targeted research to fill gaps (e.g.biodiversity, climate)

  3. Identify perceptions and needs of different service providers andstakeholders

  4. Establish a National Fire Forum

  5. Promulgate a policy including legislative framework for fire management

  6. Design and implement an output oriented national fire monitoring systemwhich serves national as well as international (global) obligations (e.g. CBC,CCD, UNFCC, ISDR Interagency Task Force [IDNDR successor arrangement]).

  7. Develop participatory guidelines for appropriate fire management

  8.   Develop and implement public awareness campaign to serve land users,service providers & general public.

  9.  Identify training needs + opportunities for land users and serviceproviders, and train priority candidates

  10. Establish a locally applicable fire danger rating system

Tab.1.Resources and issues to be addressed by a nationalNamibian Fire Policy

Resource / Issue

Service Provider

(main players in bold)

A. Fodder, Grazing

MAWRD, MET, NLRR, MRLGH, NAU, NNFU

B. Firewood, Timber

    (Permit and Control)

MET, D.o.F., DRM, D.o.T., NBP,MAWRD, MME, MTI, DWA, MRLGH

C. Biological Diversity / Resources

MET (NBP, DRM, DoF, DoT), MAWRD, MBEC, (NMN) MFMR, MTI, MOHSS, MHA (NamPol), UNAM/PoN, MHEVTST

D. Public Health, Pollution, Natural Disasters

MOHSS, MoLabour, DWA, MET

E. Environmental Degradation, Resource Depletion

  •  loss of biodiversity

  • soil erosion

  • desertification/bush encroachment

  •   loss of forest cover, no regeneration of forests,

  • other disturbance issues

MET, MAWRD

MLRR, MBEC, NPC

F. Emissions / Climate Change

MET (DEA, DoF.), MFA, MOHSS, NPC

G. Disasters / Wildfires

OPM, MOD, MET, MRLGH, MOHSS

H. Food + Agriculture / Management                      (e.g., use of fire , clearing)    

MAWRD, MET, NPC

I. Training, Research, and Monitoring

MBEC, MHEVTST, (UNAM-PON), MRLGH

J. Public Awareness, Public Education, Dissemination of Information

MAWRD, MET, MIB, (DRFN, NNFU, NAU) Rossing, NNF, DAPP, IRDNC, NNFC, Churches, NPC, NBC

 

List of Acronyms Used in Table 1

 

A.Fodder / Grazing

MAWRD: Ministry of Agriculture,Water & Rural Development

MET: Ministry of Environment& Tourism

MLRR: Ministry of Lands,Resettlement & Rehabilitation

MRLGH: Ministry of Regional& Local Government & Housing

NAU: Namibian Agricultural Union

NNFU: Namibian National Farmers’Union

 

B.Firewood or Timber

DoF: Directorate of Forestry

DRM: Directorate of ResourceManagement

DoT: Directorate of Tourism

NBP: National BiodiversityProgramme

MME: Ministry of Mines &Energy

MTI: Ministry of Trade &Industry

DWA: Department of Water Affairs

 

C.Biological Diversity / Resources

MBEC (NMN): Ministry of BasicEducation & Culture, National Museum of Namibia

MFMR: Ministry of Fisheries& Marine Resources

MOHSS: Ministry of Health &Social Services

MHA (NamPol): Ministry of HomeAffairs (Namibian Police)

UNAM: University of Namibia PoN:Polytechnic of Namibia

MHEVTST: Ministry of HigherEducation, Vocational Training, Science & Technology

D.Public Health, Pollution, Natural Disasters

MoL: Ministry of Labour

 

E.Environmental Degradation / Resource Depletion

MBEC: Ministry of BasicEducation & Culture

NPC: National PlanningCommission

 

F.Emissions / Climate Change

DEA: Directorate ofEnvironmental Affairs

MFA: Ministry of Foreign Affairs

 

G.Disasters / Wildfires

OPM: Office of the PrimeMinister, Emergency Unit

MoD: Ministry of Defence

 

H.Food and Agriculture

MAWRD: Ministry of Agriculture,Water & Rural Development

MET: Ministry of Environment& Tourism

NPC: National PlanningCommission

 

I.Training, Research and Monitoring

MBEC: Ministry of BasicEducation & Culture

UNAM-PoN: University of Namibia- Polytechnic of Namibia

MHEVTST: Ministry of HigherEducation, Vocational Training, Science & Technology

MRLGH: Ministry of Regional& Local Government & Housing

 

J.Public Awareness

MAWRD: Ministry of Agriculture,Water & Rural Development

MIB: Ministry of Information& Broadcasting

DRFN: Desert Research Foundationof Namibia Rossing: Rossing Foundation

NNF: Namibia Nature Foundation

DAPP: Danish Action People toPeople

IRDNC: Integrated RuralDevelopment & Nature Conservation

NNFC: Northern Namibia ForestryCouncil

NBC: Namibian BroadcastingCorporation

 

Tab.2.Priority steps for implementation activitieslisted above

Activity

Lead

Agency /

Program

Timeframe

Instrument and possible source of finance

4.

DoF

Now ongoing, inception by 1/2000

Establishment by 11/2000

 

NFFP Þ GRN 04/2003

5.

DoF

1997; Policy in place 11/2000

Legislation by 04/2001

NFFP Þ GRN

FAO

1.

DoF

1996

11/2000 key participants informed and analyses completed

 

NFFP Þ GRN 04/2003

2.

DoF

Analysis of gaps 12/2000

Research, analysis, literature; ongoing

NFFP/GRN + donor sources 04/2001

NFF to seek financing through donors, GRN and levies

6.

 

10.

DoF

 

DoF

1999 ongoing

 

Fire Danger Rating System by 12/2001

NFFP + GRN 04/2001

 

NFFP + GRN 04/2001

3.

 

7.

DoF +

MAWRD

DoF +

MAWRD

1999 ongoing

 

Now Þ  12/2000

NFFP + GRN 04/2001

 

NFFP

8.

DoF

Þ NFFP

Current and ongoing

Handing over to NFF by 11/2000

NFFP

NFFP Þ NFF

by 11/2000

9.

DoF

Þ NFFP

Training needs assessed for fire ecology and fire management by 06/2000

 

NFFP Þ NFF

by 11/2000

 

3.2 Breakout Group 2: StakeholderCo-ordination

The Development of an intersectoralfire management programme for Namibia requires a high degree of co-ordinationefforts between the different sectors of the society represented by governmentagencies (see Breakout Group 1), non-government institutions and interest groups,and stakeholders to be involved.

The group discussed the state offire knowledge, technology transfer, institutional capacities in fire managementin Namibia.

3.2.1. Current Status Of FireManagement In Namibia

3.2.1.1 Information

  • Etosha burning guidelines and regulations fornature conservation are based on long-term ecological research and fulfil therequirements of advanced ecosystem and fire management

  • No guidelines are available for commercialfarming areas

  • Guidelines are available for communal areas inthe Forest Act but are currently not applied because the Act does not conformwith present socio-cultural conditions

  • Guidelines in the new Forest Act include all sectors

Lack of burning policy. Such a policy is neededfor the prescription of fire or fire regimes in accordance with the need forburning in various land-use systems and wildlands, e.g. burning moribund grasses,control of bush encroachment, stimulation of forest regeneration, etc.

 

Elements to be considered inburning:

  1. reasons for burning

  2. appropriate fire regimes

  • type of fire

  • intensity of fire

  • season of burning

  • frequency of burning

  • manpower & equipment

  1. management after burning

  2. assessment of traditional burning practices

  3. impacts on biodiversity

  4. fire information systems

 

Stakeholders to be involved inpolicy development:

  1. Ministry of Agriculture, Water & Rural Development

  • Research division

  • Extension division

  • Veterinary services

  1. Ministry of Environment and Tourism

  • DoF, DEA, DRM

 

  1. Ministry of Regional, Local Government and Housing

  • Regional governor’s offices

  • Established procedures exist for fire safetybut prescriptions lacking

  • Availability of free satellite informationaccess (NOAA/AVHRR) from Harare, Zimbabwe

  • Problems; lack of techniques to assess andmonitor fire effects 

  • Legislation governing the use of fire

  • Lack of quantitative data on fire effects

  • Accessibility of unpublished data on firemanagement and effects

3.2.1.2.  Communication

  • Lack of communication channels of relevantinformation to all stakeholders (electronic system).

  • High level endorsement at ministerial level isrequired to build up a communication network

3.2.1.3.  National responsibilities

National responsibilities need to bedefined to guide, co-ordinate and implement a broad range of tasks within anationally harmonized fire management strategy. The

  1. Coordination

  • who is responsible for overall national co-ordination

  1. Who is responsibl

  • for policy

  • for training

  • for liaison

  • for sensitization

  • for extension

  • for fire management burning policy

  • for extinguishing fire

 

The key stakeholder to be involvedin sharing responsibilities are:

  • Commercial farmers (commercial farming areas)

  • Community leaders/tribal-traditionalauthorities(communal lands)

  • Private landowners (municipalities)

  • Service providers (national parks)

  • Fire brigades (urban areas)

  • Tourism sector

  • Relevant research institutions

  • Educational institutions

  • Relevant NGOs

 

3.2.1.4.  Research and Training

Research and training must addressthe most urgent and immediate needs of the country. It has been recognized thatthe wealth of fundamental knowledge in fire science as well as existingtechnologies and procedures in fire management must be transferred to the userlevel. The focus should be on:

  • Problem-oriented research

  • Research on developing techniques for assessingand monitoring fire effects by field based remote sensing

  • Intergrative sectoral research

  • Training i.a.w. the needs to be defined

  •  Capacity building of existing staff

  • Practical training courses in fire management

  • Exchange of extensionists in SADC

  • Co-ordination of syllabi on fire management atnational training institutions

  • Public awareness campaign

  • Exploring funding possibilities within GRN& donors

 

3.2.1.5.  International co-operation

The transboundary fire issuesaffecting Namibia and its neighbours require a strong co-operation with theneighbouring countries, the SADC community and international partners. Mainemphasis should be given on:

  • Transboundary meeting to involve allstakeholders

  • Reactivation of the SADC protocol on firemanagement, 1996

  • SADC and bilateral agreements

  • Magnitude of crossboundary fires

  • Magnitude of crossboundary air pollution

  • Procedures for containing cross-border fires

  • SAFARI 2000 research

  • Connect Namibia with international fireinformation network via the Global Fire Monitoring Center (GFMC)

  • Organization of workshops with internationalinputs

  •  Identification of best fire managementpractices within the region

 

3.2.1.6.  Finance

  • For financing institution and capacity buildingand implementation of a national fire management policy commitments are requiredby the government of Namibia and the international community. Priority must be given to

  • work towards economic independence at alllevels to create sustainable funding

International funding sources needto be explored through:

  • Donors, e.g. IUCN, WWF, GEF, GFMC, FAO, EU

  • NGOs

  •  Business enterprises (PPP – Public-PrivatePartnerships)

  •  Exploit opportunities such as E.I.F.

  • Seek partners for carbon trade

 

3.2.1.7.  Evaluation and Feedback

An efficient monitoring andevaluating capacity must be built in Namibi. It is recommended that the NationalFire Forum should:

  • Monitor and review/evaluate fire managementProgrammes

  • Establish systems/channels for monitoring andevaluation of fire management activities including bush encroachment, climatechange, employment generation through the control of e.g. transboundary fires.

 

4. Conclusions and Recommendations

The national Namibian Round Table onFire was an important kick-off event to initiate a national fire managementstrategy and programme in which all sectors of the society concerned willactively participate.

From the very beginning the RoundTable was not designed to elaborate the details of a national fire programme.The report, which includes the recommendations arising from the breakout groupsand the Round Table plenary, represent the opinions and visions of the mostimportant government and non-government institutions and stakeholders.

It is now most urgent to follow upthe recommendations by priority. Highest ranking priority is the establishmentof a national fire forum which will provide the continuation of the spirit of aRound Table in which all stakeholders will jointly share responsibility.

 

References

In this list only the quotedliterature sources are provided. For more background information: see thereports by Goldammer (1998) and Trollope and Trollope (1999).

Goldammer, J. G.1998. Development of a National Fire Policy andGuidelines on Fire Management in Namibia. Namibia-Finland Forestry Programme,Directorate of Forestry, Ministry of Environment and Tourism, Windhoek. RevisedDraft (18 October 1998).

Kromhout, C. 1999. ProposedCooperative Fire Management in the SADC Countries of Southern Africa. Int.Forest Fire News No. 21, 22-24.

International Tropical TimberOrganization (ITTO). 1997. ITTO Guidelines on Fire Management in TropicalForests. ITTO Policy Development Series No.6. ITTO,Yokohama, 40 p.

Swap, R. 1999. The Southern AfricanRegional Science Initiative ‑ SAFARI 2000. Int. Forest Fire News No. 21,28-34.

Trollope W. S. W., and L. A.Trollope. 1999. Technical review of the Integrated Forest Fire Managementcomponent of the Namibia-Finland Forestry Programme in the East Caprivi Regionof Namibia. Windhoek – Fort Hare, August 1999.

This report has been prepared in theframe of the Namibia-Finland Forestry Programme, Directorate of Forestry,Ministry of Environment and Tourism, Windhoek, Namibia (December 1999) by

 

Johann G. Goldammer

Global Fire Monitoring Center (GFMC)
Max Planck Institute for Chemistry,Biogeochemistry Department
c/oFreiburg University, PO Box
79100 Freiburg
Germany

 

 

 

Theostrich in Namibia’s fire prevention logo represents a species that isendangered by excessive wildfires


|

| Country Notes |

24. November 2017/by GFMCadmin

National guidelines on Forest Fire Management in Namibia

na

National Guidelines on Forest Fire Management in Namibia
Final Draft 31 March/2001

(IFFN No. 25 – July 2001, p. 73-102)


Preface

I. NATIONAL FOREST FIRE POLICY AND LEGISLATION

II. FOREST FIRE MANAGEMENT STRATEGIES

III. INSTITUTIONAL FRAMEWORK AND CAPACITY BUILDING

IV.   SOCIO-ECONOMIC CONSIDERATIONS

V. PUBLIC TRAINING AND EDUCATION

VI. RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT

VII.  MONITORING AND EVALUATION


Country Notes
IFFN No. 25

24. November 2017/by GFMCadmin

National guidelines on Forest Fire Management in Namibia

na

National Guidelines on Forest Fire Management in Namibia
Final Draft 31 March/2001

(IFFN No. 25 – July 2001)


Preface

The extent of occurrence of forest fires in Namibia in recent years, especially during year 2000, shows that fire management efforts have to be strengthened throughout the country. Only East Caprivi has been able to show promising reduction in burned areas since the pilot efforts on Forest Fire Management started there in 1996.

In areas outside Eastern Caprivi, results have been slow in coming. One of the main reasons for the slow response is the lack of institutional capacity in the Directorate of Forestry (D.o.F.) itself. The same applies to the Agricultural Extension staff as well as the staff of the Directorate of Resource Management working outside Etosha. Some of the National Parks like Etosha have well established guidelines on Fire Management whereas others; like Mamili, Mudumu, Kaudom etc. are totally burned year after year. The Malengalenga-Liyambezi peat lands are also burned annually, through agricultural practices. This shows that the properties of peat are unknown among agricultural extensionists.

The outdated forest legislation has also been lacking in specific areas e.g. on guidelines for Forest Fire Management both in communal as well as in commercial farm areas. The uncertainty regarding fire management directives also applies to the Ministry of Regional, Local Government and Housing which Ministry, by and large, is responsible for all fire management activities in Namibia.

With the inception in 1996 of the Namibia’s Forestry Strategic Plan, the path was opened for community participation in local management of Forest Fires. These participation efforts were soon named Integrated Forest Fire Management activities or IFFM activities.

On the behalf of the Namibia-Finland Forestry Programme (NFFP) and its component on Integrated Forest Fire Management (IFFM) we would like to acknowledge the valuable contribution to the process of preparing the National Guidelines on Forest Fire Management for Namibia by the following persons:

Project Steering Committee:

Dr. H.O. Kojwang  Director of Forestry, Chairman
Dr. Alex Verlinden  Remote sensing Specialist, NFFP
Mr. Kari Alanko  Councellor Embassy of Finland, Windhoek
Ms. Sinikka Antila Councellor/Chargé d´Affaires,  Embassy of Finland, Windhoek
Mr. Moses Chakanga  National Co-ordinator for NFFP
Mr. Tomi Tuomasjukka Acting Consultant Team Leader, NFFP
Mr. Harri Seppänen Consultant Team Leader, NFFP
Ms. Marja-Ojanen-J Education Specialist NFFP/Ogongo
Mr. Joseph Hailwa Deputy Director, Directorate of Forestry
Mr. Osman Y. Hamid Education Specialist, Forest Department Head, Ogongo
Mr. Mike Jurvélius Forest Fire Specialist, NFFP
Mr. Dennis Sikabongo Fire Chief, Katima Mulilo
Mr. Carlos Salinas  Community Forestry Specialist, NFFP
Mr. Thomas Selänniemi  Forest Inventory Specialist, NFFP
Mr. Jussi Viitanen   Environmental Forestry Specialist, NFFP                      

National Persons Consulted:

Mr. Bernhard Sibalatani  Governor of Caprivi Region
Ms. G. Uushona  Governor Otjozondjupa Region
Ms. Anneli Shishome  Chief Forester, north-west, D.o.F
Mr. Simeon Hengari  Forester, north-east , D.o.F.
Mr. Giovanni Schoeman Emergency Officer, City of Windhoek Emergency Services
Mr. Chris Hines   Development Biologist, Windhoek
Mr. Bornbright Lilungwe Traditional Authorities, Silalo Induna, Caprivi
Mr. Walter Piepmeyer Forestry Officer , Otjozondjupa, D.o.F.
Mr. Johan le Roux  Remote Sensing & GIS Specialist, Etosha
Mr. Konrad van Heerden Senior Inspector, Ministry of Basic Education, Sports & Culture
Mr. Alex Musiyalela Director of Caprivi Drama Group
Mr. Kasiwa Mukenani S. Painter; Caprivi Arts and Cultural Association

International Consultants:

Prof. Dr. Johann G. Goldammer
Prof. Dr. Winston Trollope

Ms. Evelien Kamminga
Ms. Merja Mäkelä
Mr. Simeon Trigg

Other contributors:

Dr. Ritva Kivikkokangas-S. Professor, University of Helsinki, Deptm. of Development Geography  
Ms. Krista Virtanen MSc-thesis work on Forest Fire attitudes (in Caprivi), University of Wolwerhampton.

The Ministry of Environment and Tourism through its Directorate of Forestry wishes to thank all the people listed above and additionally many others who’s names do not appear above for their valuable contribution to these National Guidelines on Forest Fire Management in Namibia.

These new National Guidelines on Forest Fire Management are expected to become a yardstick for all Forest Fire Management activities in the country in the future.

We hope that these new Guidelines will be useful in developing suitable practices for sustainable forest management in Namibia.

Windhoek, April 2001
Chairman of Project Steering Committee

Dr. H.O. Kojwang
Director of Forestry

ABBREVIATIONS

CACA   Caprivi Arts and Cultural Association
CBO  Community based organization
CBRM    Community based resource management
CEC  Constituency Emergency Committee
DFO District Forest Officer
DRM  Directorate of Resource Management
D.o.F. Directorate of Forestry
EOU  Emergency Operational Unit
ECE United Nations Economic Commission for Europe
FAO  Food and Agricultural Organization of United Nations
FBSO Fire Brigades Service Ordinance
FDO  Forestry District Office
FPA   Fire Protection Association
GFMC      Global Fire Monitoring Center
GPTF  Game Product Trust Fund
IFFM    Integrated Forest Fire Management
IFFN      International Forest Fire News (FAO/ECE)
ILO  International Labour Organization of United Nations
Induna     Village elder or village chief
Induna Silalo    District Village Chief
ITTO      International Tropical Timber Organization
Khuta      Council of Village or District Chiefs
LIKWAMA     Local farmers union in Caprivi
MBESC Ministry of Basic Education, Sports and Culture
MET Ministry of Environment and Tourism
MRLGH  Ministry of Regional, Local Government and Housing
NamPol  Namibian Police
NBC Namibian Broadcasting Corporation
NDF Namibian Defense Forces
NEMC  National Emergency Management Council
NEMU National Emergency Management Unit
Neudamm Agricultural College of the University of Namibia
NFFP Namibia-Finland Forestry Programme
NFF   National Fire Forum
NGO Non-governmental organization
Ogongo   Agricultural College of the University of Namibia
PO  People’s organization
REC Regional Emergency Committee
SADC Southern African Development Community
TAA Traditional Authorities Act
UNEP  United Nations Environmental Programme
WHO World Health Organization
WMO World Meteorological Organization

                 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

I. NATIONAL FOREST FIRE POLICY AND LEGISLATION
II. FOREST FIRE MANAGEMENT STRATEGIES
III. INSTITUTIONAL FRAMEWORK AND CAPACITY BUILDING

IV. SOCIO-ECONOMIC CONSIDERATIONS

V. PUBLIC TRAINING AND EDUCATION
VI. RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT
VII. MONITORING AND EVALUATION
VIII. REFERENCES


Country Notes
IFFN No. 25

24. November 2017/by GFMCadmin

National guidelines on Forest Fire Management in Namibia

na

National Guidelines on Forest Fire Management in Namibia
Final Draft 31 March/2001

(IFFN No. 25 – July 2001)


I. NATIONAL FOREST FIRE POLICY AND LEGISLATION

1.1 National Policy

Principles of Forest Utilization

Namibian forests are considered a natural gift from God. They are there for the benefit and use of the Namibian nation and its recreational values are to be enjoyed by the rest of the world.

Namibian forests form a part of the basic capital in the nation building process. They need to be used wisely and sustainable for the prosperity of all nationals, commercial farmers, municipalities and local communities both now and in the future, and in accordance with established national forestry criteria specified by the indicators for sustainable forest management in Namibia.

Activities

a) Strengthen the coordination between all government sectors and other stakeholders using forests and land resources so that the utilization actions are based upon sustainable use of the environment.
b) Motivate and encourage all citizens in both government, private sectors and local communities to consciously and voluntarily protect the forest resources from disturbances that can decrease the sustainable functions and benefits of a well-managed and protected forest.
c) Encourage private sector, local communities and government agencies involved in forest utilization to carry out their activities in a way that secures prosperity to the region.

Principles of Forest Protection

Issue guidelines that sees to it that forestry development continues to be upgraded in a way that ensures the availability of forest products. This will aid the development of industries, work sectors, business opportunities, national income and regional development. The national forests are to maintain their functions in the ecosystem; benefiting hydrology, gene pool, soil fertility and climate. Forest protection is meant to secure the sustainability of forests at the same time maintaining the continuity of forest development.

Forest protection includes all efforts, initiatives and measures to prevent and limit the damage to forests and forest products. Humans, livestock, fire, wild life, natural disaster pest and disease can cause forest destruction. This is also reflected in the National Disaster Plan of Namibia.

Forest protection also includes the preservation of ancestral and communal rights to a forest area or rights to utilize the products in the forest. These principles are also included in the Traditional Authorities Act of 1995 wherein Point 10 outlines the following: Functions, duties and powers of Traditional Authorities (Sub-section 10.2: In addition to the functions specified in subsection (1), the members of a traditional authority shall have the following duties, namely:

Activities

In accordance with the Traditional Authorities Act of 1995 the members of a traditional authority shall have the following duties, namely:

  1. to assist the police and other law enforcement agencies in the prevention of crime and apprehension of offenders within their jurisdiction.
  2. to assist and cooperate with the organs of the central, regional and local government in the execution of their policies by keeping the members of traditional community informed of developmental projects in their area
  3. to ensure that the members of their traditional community use the natural resources at their disposal on a sustainable basis and in a manner that conserves the environment and maintains the ecosystem, for the benefit of all persons in Namibia.

General:

  1. Encourage regional forestry institutions, government agencies, concession holders and local communities to take all possible measures in limiting the damages to the forest and the forest products.
  2. Ensure that stakeholders at all levels understand the functions and benefits of the forest. This will encourage cross-sectoral support in the protection and prevention of damaging wild fires.
  3. Create a functional regional/district level fire control system that is supported by; facilities, human resources and adequate funding.
  4. Encourage the formation of Fire Protection Associations among commercial farms. This provision also covers new settlement farms in commercial farming areas.
  5.   Develop regulations and guidelines on land clearing by the use of fire or by other means

Principles on Protection Priorities

The priorities in forest protection should include specific areas of International, national or local priorities. This would include flora and fauna, religiously or culturally important forests, conservancies or community forests. Therefore the protection of these forests from fire should be given highest priority. This does not exclude forest areas of Production Forest from the priority list.

Activities

  1. Develop a master plan on the protection of forests from fire for each conservation area.
  2. Motivate local communities to develop a fire management plan for their area.
  3. Establish regulations on the use of fire within each specific area including bush encroached areas where fire is used as a tool to eradicate the bush. These well intended activities may however lead to desertification and loss of biodiversity.

Principles for Community Participation in Forest Protection

Besides the national government, traditional authorities, commercial farmers and local communities are also responsible for the implementation of forest protection policies to maintain and manage the environment, to prevent and overcome damages, reduce air pollution, wind and water erosion as well as to sustain natural resources.

When it comes to Declared National Parks the principles of Community Involvement in Park Management (CBRM) should be applied to any fire situation in or around the Park. The local communities involved in forest fire management should be paid out of the Game Product Trust Fund.

Activities

  1. To inform and educate the rural population, commercial farm communities and the general public in the role of forests and its contribution to the national economy. Numerous are still the people who see the forest as merely a source of income for timber and non-wood forest products. This short term exploitation goal has led to drastic damage and denudation of forests to the point that the existence and quality of forest resources have declined greatly.
  2. To inform and educate the public about adverse environmental and economic effects of bush encroachment on commercial farming communities.
  3. Encourage the formation of Fire Protection Associations in commercial farming areas and Fire Committees in communal areas.
  4. Encourage NGOs, CBOs and private initiatives regarding forest extension and law abiding activities.
  5. Encourage civic organizations, religious organizations, women groups, listener-reader-viewer groups, conservation groups, handicraft producers, local artists and environmental organizations to upgrade their understanding and appreciation of forests through their participation in regular activities and exchange of information.
  6. Enhance the role of civic organizations in motivating community participation in forest protection activities including fire prevention and suppression.

Principles on the Success of Policy Implementation

The protection of forests from fire can succeed if the local communities, commercial farming communities and all levels of government agencies understand the problem. They have to appreciate the complexity of the issue to be able to implement all policies of forest protection from fire based on fire management legislation and technical provisions.

The Directorate of Forestry, Ministry of Agriculture and NGOs should be involved in establishing Fire Protection Associations in commercial farming communities and in addition to provide appropriate training to commercial farming communities. In communal areas the government and traditional authorities have been implementing forest fire management in selected communities since May. 1996.

In order to achieve a more successful implementation, following steps have already been taken:

  1.  The Caprivi Forest Fire Control Project was initiated in March 1996
  2.  Namibia Forestry Strategic Plan was developed in May 1996.
  3.  Fire Drama Play developed together with Caprivi Drama Group, July 1996.
  4. Regional Meeting on the Draft Forest Bill, August 1996.
  5. Evaluation carried out on the Community Based Fire Control Approach, August 1997.
  6. First Draft of Forest Fire Policy and Guidelines developed, March 1998
  7. Fire Control was incorporated in the new Namibia-Finland Forestry Programme July 1998.
  8.  Material collected for National Guidelines/Caprivi Fire Management Plan, August 1998.
  9. 50 schools and 25.000 people covered by fire education November 1998.
  10.  Second meeting in Caprivi Governor’s Office, August 1998.
  11. Project renamed: Integrated Forest Fire Management (IFFM) September, 1998
  12. Mid-Term Review of IFFM  carried out, report produced, December, 1998.
  13. Investigation of Attitudes to Forest Fires carried out (MSc. Thesis), December, 1998.
  14. Gender assessment on IFFM carried out, Report Produced, April, 1999.
  15. Socio-Cultural assessment of IFFM carried out, Report produced, August 1999.
  16. Technical/environmental assessment of IFFM carried out, Report produced, August 1999.
  17.  Third meeting in Caprivi Governor’s Office, August 1999.
  18. National/International Round Table Meeting organized; October 1999.
  19. Second Draft of National Forest Fire Policy and Guidelines produced, December 1999.
  20. Handing over of 10,000 copies of Fire Story and Cartoon handed over to Ministry of Basic Education, Sports and Culture (MBESC) , National Television and radio broadcast, January 2000.
  21. 100 schools and 40,000 people covered by fire education, February 2000.
  22. Workshop on National Criteria and Indicators for forestry, February 2000.
  23. Youth Fire Drama Festival; National television and radio broadcast, March 2000.
  24. Survey on grass biomass (and its implications on burning) in eastern Caprivi, July, 2000.
  25. Five training courses carried out for 15 farmers associations in commercial farms, September, 2000.
  26.  First Meeting on the establishment of a proposed National Fire Forum, October 2000.
  27.  Third Draft of National Guidelines on FFM handed over to the Regional Governor, December, 2000.
  28. Fourth Draft of Caprivi Forest Fire Management Plan prepared, December 2000.
  29. Fifth Draft of National Guidelines handed over to the Regional Governor, February, 2001.
  30. Second meeting for Namibia National (Forest) Fire Forum convened, February 2000.
  31. Caprivi Forest Fire Management Plan Drafted. March, 2001.
  32. Final Draft of National Guidelines on FFM distributed, March 2001.

Activities

  1. Synchronize understanding of forest protection policy on fire with other governmental land use policies through intensive communication via; formal correspondence, meetings, seminars and workshops.
  2. Formulate an integral forest and land management policy including forest and land fire aspects. The fire elements must be balanced with other elements and must be acceptable to all involved parties. The formulated policy should be easily understood, it should be accepted by all parties and all stakeholders should be able to implement it.

1.2 Legislation

Principles Governing Fire Law Enforcement

The Namibian Constitution and other Laws are the tools for the government to govern the country. Thus all actions of the state apparatus are based on laws, including those actions carried out to protect forests from wildfire.

Advance coordination between forestry and other institutions is required prior to implementing forest fire rules and regulations.

In order to establish a comprehensive forest protection system that includes items of varying importance, numerous legislative acts have to be enacted. Given that forest and land fire problems are very complex and that they continue to change over time, there is a need to stabilize, simplify and re-dress this legislation into technical instructions that are more practical to apply in the field.

These acts must be widely publicized so that all stakeholder levels, government agencies, commercial farmers and local communities can understand, accept and implement them correctly.

Fire Brigade Services Ordinance, 1978 states further: Emergency means any situation requiring immediate action to prevent death or injury to persons or damage to property, but not declared state of emergency in terms of any law.

Any local authority maintaining a fire brigade service or a community fire unit; shall appoint a Chief Fire Officer or Fire Chief.
There is a need to strengthen the IFFM resources within the D.oF. by establishing a special fire task force at headquarter level. This taskforce will establish links with: NDF, NamPol, Agriculture, NamPower, Works/Roads and NamRail on fire prevention activities.
This task force will also co-ordinate the activities evolving around the formation of a National Fire Forum.
Additionally one member should be specialized in the education (forest extension) of schools and local communities and commercial farms.

Activities

  1. Study the existing laws and formulate a new Forest Bill and Traditional Authorities Act to accommodate the increasing fire protection problems caused by socio-cultural changes, particularly technical and organizational aspects. These new guidelines and approaches will then form the framework for annual work plans for integrated forest fire management.
  2. Encourage all government levels, private sectors and traditional authorities network to develop standard fire management procedures that are suited to the local socio-cultural set-up as well as to the technical skills of the people in the target community. Keep Chief Forester and Head Office levels informed about intended recommendations and activities in the field.
  3. Publicize the regulations and legislation on the protection of forests from fire to enhance awareness. Use formal and informal education processes to disseminate information through various governmental and mass media channels, communication forum, correspondence, seminars, workshops etc.
  4.   Enhance law enforcement efforts through cooperation and coordination between enforcement personnel and related institutions e.g. NDF, Police, Veterinary, Water supply and Customs and Immigration in the case of transboundary activities.
  5. Analyze how and to what extent the ITTO Guidelines on Fire Management in Tropical Forests are applicable to Namibia. Apply these special provisions to Namibian conditions.
  6. Adopt and apply relevant components of the Global Action Plan on Peatlands through the Ramsar Convention, the Kyoto Protocol of the Framework Convention on Climate Change and other relevant mechanisms.

Country Notes
IFFN No. 25

24. November 2017/by GFMCadmin

Namibia: 30 % Reduction in Fire Incidents in three Years (IFFN No. 19 – September 1998)

na

30 % Reduction in Fire Incidents in three Years

(IFFN No. 19 – September 1998,p. 67-70)


Background

The Namibia-Finland Forestry Programme (4 years) was initiated in April 1997. This Programme also encompasses Forest Fire Control as one of its components. The Pilot Project on Forest Fire Control for East Caprivi (meanwhile: “Integrated Forest Fire Management”) was started in March 1996, more than one year before the new Programme. The aim of this project is to transfer the responsibility of forest protection to the users and beneficiaries of the forests, i.e. local communities.

Traditionally the protection of the environment in the local communities belonged to the community itself. The colonialization of Namibia disrupted however this tradition, and the ownership and management of all forests were reverted to the Government.

61705 Byte

Fig.1. Open fire-degraded stand of Zambesi Teak in the Caprivi Strip, Namibia. Photo: J.G.Goldammer

In 1996 an effort to remedy this situation was launched and the Directorate of Forestry decided to develop a National Forest Strategy for Namibia. This strategy recommended that the Government should return most of the forests to their original owners i.e. to the local communities. One of the problems foreseen was that while the system to legalize the transfer of ownership was being set-up, the forests were being destroyed. The destruction was going on at an alarming rate, and was mostly done by cutting down and burning the entire forest, thus converting the area to other land uses.

Pilot area for Forest Fire Control

The pilot area consists of 1.4 million hectares of the best forests of Namibia and it belongs to the sub-tropical region. Despite that the area belongs to the Kalahari zone, the relatively high rainfall (700 mm) keeps the forests growing.

On the one hand, the early burning (April-June) has been tried out in the area in 1960’s, and this practice was recommended, because the fires seldom seriously damaged the trees. On the other hand, late burning always damaged the trees, often killing many of them. It was also found, that no regeneration of natural species occurred since 1970’s. This was specifically true for the Zambezi Teak (Baikea plurijuga) which ones was the predominant species in the area.

Project Profile

Name: Namibia-Finland Forestry Programme (April 1997 – May 2001) Component: Forest Fire Control Duration: March 1996 – May 1999

Implementing Agencies

Namibia: Directorate of Forestry, Ministry of Environment & Tourism Finland: FTP International Ltd. & Enso Forest Development

Personnel

Namibia: 1+1+2 +10 counterparts (14) Finland: 1 specialist Project site: East Caprivi Region (1.4 million ha) Project Office: Forestry District Office, Katima Mulilo

Strategy

The project is embarking on two different approaches to the fire problem:

  • To support public relations and extension activities for forest fire prevention within the Government and the training and mobilizing of local communities into fire management units.

  • To run a massive Fire Campaign in schools and local organizations in the area, involving all stakeholders. This includes the production of written material, posters, bill boards, theatre plays, radio programmes and videos.

The strategy does not include investing in fire suppression, it is estimated that the pilot area had more than 10.000 fires in 1996. Thereby, at present moment it is of no use to try to put out 10.000 fires. Instead, the activities are directed towards the source of fire, the local people. The strategy adopted, will teach people in local communities in how to prevent and control fire.

44432 Byte

Fig.2. Fire prevention poster designed by the Pilot Project on Integrated Forest Fire Management for East Caprivi. Photo: J.G.Goldammer

27 local communities with 279 villagers joined the fire prevention programme in 1997. The Development Brigade Corporation (DBC) with 236 ex-combatants (freedom fighters) also joined the fire prevention programme in 1997. A total of 1217 km of fire line were constructed in various strategic areas by the 515 people above.

It is further estimated that the whole of northern Namibia or 10-14 million ha or the forested areas are prone to forest fires. In 1996, it was estimated that 4-5 million ha of forest land and more than a million ha of grass savanna burned in the North-Central and North-Eastern part of the country.

Tab.1. Achievements of the fire prevention programme

Conclusions

This forest fire control project is the first-ever, globally, of its kind, not to have local people being employed by the Government. The 13 Traditional (tribal) Authorities who have signed a contract to join the annual fire control programme will select a Fire Contractor in each community. This Contractor will them employ people from his/her village, to work on fire prevention.

The Government will provide the village fire crews with training and with appropriate fire tools. The Government then pays 20 $US/km of fire line produced on the condition that the area is not burned. In case of a burn, a percentage will be deducted from the pay. The cost of producing these fire lines is 40-50 $US/km. This means that each community and the DBC is actually paying half the actual cost (20 $US/km) to construct these fire lines. The local communities and the DBC produced 1217 km of fire line in Eastern Caprivi in 1997.

The local population is quite enthusiastic when they see means and ways of protecting their grazing lands and agricultural fields from fire. In addition, very few domestic animals have died in fires in 1996-97, one fatal case of arson excluded, where 100 animals died. Likewise, the communities have seen that no animals have died of starvation in 1996-97, because most grazing areas are still largely unburned, at the end of the fire season.

Local traditions

The Traditional Authorities have caught 38 people in 1997, for careless burning in various villages, and these people have been tried by these communities. This makes the fire management at community level very efficient. Thereby also, the Police need not get involved in these cases. Thus, also the Forestry personnel, when catching people burning, brings these culprits directly to the Tribal Authorities. The fine at village level is often measured in cattle, one (1) cow is valued at 150 $US in this area. Normally the fine for burning the grazing areas is 2 cows.

The Tribal Authorities relate the fine to the loss of weight in their cattle, 200 heads loosing 2 kg/each, makes the loss 400 kg of meat. The buyers of cattle pay 1 $US/kg for the cattle. The above fine is: 400 kg x 1 $US = 400 $US. In case of bigger herds, the fine is proportionately larger. The fine varies slightly between the communities.

From: Mike Jurvélius (Fire Specialist) and
John Kawana (Fire Chief)
Address:
Forestry District Office
P.B. 1020
Katima Mulilo
NAMIBIA

Fax: ++264-677-3322
Tel: ++264-677-3143


Top
IFFN No. 19
International Technical Cooperation Projects
Country Notes

24. November 2017/by GFMCadmin
Page 1 of 3123

 

 

 


SVC Commitment by GFMC

 


International Wildfire Emergency Assistance

 

  • Impressum
  • Datenschutzerklärung

© Global Fire Monitoring Center (GFMC) / Fire Ecology Research Group
All materials produced by GFMC or IFFN must be quoted properly. Copyrights of materials provided by other organizations or publications and websites hyperlinked with this website must be observed. It is not permitted to publish or otherwise use photographs produced by the GFMC and other providers without a written permission.

supported by Jochen Eurich

WP-Backgrounds Lite by InoPlugs Web Design and Juwelier Schönmann 1010 Wien
 

Loading Comments...
 

    Scroll to top