GFMC
  • About GFMC
    • GLOBAL FIRE MONITORING CENTER
      • About the GFMC
      • Partners and Sponsors of the GFMC
      • GFMC Activities Calendar
      • Contact
      • GFMC AWARDS
      • Arbeitsgruppe Feuerökologie
        • Feuerökologie
        • Forschung
        • Veröffentlichungen
        • Promotionen
        • Diplomarbeiten
        • Kurse
        • Fakultät für Umwelt und Natürliche Ressourcen
        • Uni Freiburg
  • Global Cooperation
    • Global Wildland Fire Network (GWFN)
      • GWFN Home
      • Direct access to the 14 Regional Wildland Fire Networks
      • Regional Eurasian Wildland Fire Network
      • Regional Southeast Europe / Caucasus Wildland Fire Network
      • Sub-Regional Euro-Alpine Wildland Fire Network
      • Regional Central Asia Wildland Fire Network
      • Regional Northeast Asia Wildland Fire Network
      • Regional South Asia Wildland Fire Network
      • Regional South East Asia Wildland FireNetwork (ASEAN)
      • Regional Australasia Wildland Fire Network (AFAC)
      • Regional Subsahara Africa Wildland FireNetwork (Afrifirenet)
      • Regional North America Wildland Fire Network
      • Regional South America Wildland FireNetwork
      • Regional Mesoamerica Wildland Fire Network
      • Regional Caribbean Wildland Fire Network
      • Regional Mediterranean Wildland Fire Network (Silva Mediterranea Forest Fire Working Group)
    • Regional Fire Management Resource Centers (RFMRCs) and Regional Fire Monitoring Centers (RFMCs)
      • Regional Fire Monitoring Center for Southeast Europe / Caucasus (RFMC)
      • Regional Eastern Europe Fire Monitoring Center (REEFMC)
      • Regional Central Asia Fire Management Resource Center (RCAFMRC)
      • Regional Fire Management Resource Center – South East Asia Region (RFMRC-SEA)
      • Regional Eurasia Fire Monitoring Center (REFMC)
      • Regional Fire Management Resource Center – South America Region (RFMRC-SAR)
      • Regional Eastern Africa Fire Management Resource Center (REAFMRC)
      • Regional Western Africa Fire Management Resource Center (RWAFMRC)
      • International Organizations
      • United Nations (UN)
      • European Multilateral Organizations (Council of Europe, OSCE)
      • International Tropical Timber Organization (ITTO)
      • The World Bank
      • North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO)
      • European Commission
    • IWPM – Portal
      • The IWPM in Brief
      • IWPM – Background Reading
      • Offers and Recent Successful Capacity Building by Exchange
      • International Fire Aviation Guidelines
      • Int. Wildfire Emergency Assistance
      • Emergency Assistance through the United Nations and the GFMC
      • INTERNATIONAL AGREEMENTS FOR ASSISTANCE IN LANDSCAPE FIRE EMERGENCIES
      • Satellite Data for Wildland Fire Emergency Response
      • International Wildland Fire Response Operators and Material Suppliers
      • International Wildland Fire Assistance
  • Global Fire News
    • Global Landscape Fire News
      • 2023
      • 2022
      • 2021
      • 2020
      • 2019
      • 2018
      • 2017
      • 2016
      • 2015
      • 2014
      • 2013
      • 2012
      • 2011
      • 2010
      • 2009
      • 2008
      • 2007
      • 2006
      • 2005
      • 2004
      • 1999 to 2003
    • GFMC NEWS
      • GFMC Activities by Calendar Year
      • Global Landscape Fire Network Bulletins
      • GFMC News and Publications
      • UNISDR Global Wildland Fire Network (GWFN)
      • Past Conferences
      • CURRENT GLOBAL FIRE STATUS
      • Access to Current Global Landscape Fire Maps & Selected Archived Global Fire Events
      • EARLY WARNING PORTAL
      • Global Fire Early Warning System
      • LANDSCAPE FIRE EMISSIONS PORTAL
      • Regional and Global Landscape Fire Emissions
  • Fire Management
    • International Landscape Fire Management Programmes
      • Community-Based Fire Management (CBFiM)
        • CBFiM basics
        • Village Defense
        • Training
        • Gender
        • Children
        • Religious Communities
        • Migrants and Refugees
        • Protected Areas
        • CBFiM – Country Reports / Activities
        • Tourism
        • Climate Change
        • Research and Literature
        • Materials
        • Processes
        • Meetings
        • Media News
        • Links
    • Eurasian Fire in Nature Conservation Network (EFNCN)
      • Objectives
      • Members
      • Eurasia White Paper
      • EFNCN Projects
      • Experiments, Training, Meetings
      • Background Information
      • Links
      • Contact
      • International Peatland Fire Network
      • International Peatland Fire Network
      • International Technical Coop Projects in Fire Management and Research
      • International Technical Coop Projects in Fire Management and Research
      • Fire Initiatives and Projects by NGOs
      • Fire Initiatives and Projects by NGOs
    • Landscape Fire Management Training & Employment Opportunities
      • EuroFire Competency Standards and Training Materials
      • Fire Management Courses and University Training
      • Retrospectives of Fire Meetings & Training Courses
      • Research and Employment Opportunities
      • Landscape Fire Management Glossaries and Guidelines
      • Fire Management Glossaries
      • GFMC Fire Management Guidelines
  • Publications & Research
    • Publications and Global Landscape Fire Statistics
      • International Forest Fire News (IFFN) (1989-2015)
    • Global Landscape Fire Inventories and Models
      • Global Burnt Area Satellite Products
      • Other Remote Sensing Products
      • Fire Statistical Databases
      • Global Fire Models
      • Global Wildland Fire Assessment
    • Landscape Fire Research
      • GFMC and the United Nations University (UNU)
      • International Wildland Fire Research Programmes (IGBP-IGAC-BIBEX, IUFRO; IBFRA, FIRE PARADOX)
    • Online Literature & Software
      • Online Publications, Libraries and Bibliographies
      • U.S. Fire Information Systems and Software Products
      • International Association of Wildland Fire (IAWF)
      • GFMC Photo Archive and Contests
  • Conferences
    • Upcoming and Past Landscape Fire Conferences, Symposia and other Meetings
      • International, Regional and National Conferences and Meetings
    • Archive of GFMC / GWFN Conferences
      • Conferences organized by GFMC since 1977
    • International Wildland Fire Conferences (IWFC)
      • International Wildland Fire Conferences (IWFC) 1989-2023
  • Search
  • Menu

Emergency Fire Prevention And Control Project in the Amazon: Annex 2

world_bank

Annex 2

Brazil: Emergency Fire Prevention And Control Project in the Amazon
Project Description


Project Components and Activities

The Emergency Loan would finance support the strengthening of federal, state and local fire prevention agencies, community outreach and training activities, and the procurement of appropriate fire prevention and suppression technology through the following components:

I. Risk Assessment And Fire Monitoring: Under this component, the federal government, in conjunction with qualified NGOs, would use appropriate technology and methods for assessing fire risk in the Arc through the integration of soil moisture maps, forest type maps, and human activity maps. These data, combined with other information, will allow decision-makers to assess which parts of the Arc are most at risk to forest fires to guide prevention and suppression efforts and the allocation of resources to those efforts. In addition, this component would initiate studies and long-range planning to identify and respond to such issues as the potential for increased flammability of burned areas in subsequent years.

II. Forest Fire Prevention: The objective of this component is to develop technical assistance and educational campaigns for local communities and different stakeholders in high risk areas in order to provide guidance on the risks and consequences of uncontrolled burning. The prevention activities, such as training in the controlled use of fire and public awareness and education campaigns would be coordinated by IBAMA in partnership with local authorities and NGOs. This component would also provide the risk-prone region with training and equipment to promptly address forest fires and prevent them from burning out of control. Fire combat brigades at the local and municipal level would be constituted and trained to address local fires and would call on State fire companies as needed in the event of uncontrollable wildfires. In addition, under this component, IBAMA, through an intensified enforcement campaign in conjunction with State Environmental Agencies and Forestry Police, would conduct intensive enforcement operations and compliance to regulations would be increased in the Deforestation Arc as part of an integral system that would prevent and regulate illegal burning activities.

III. Forest Fire Suppression: Contingency plans for the combat of forest fires as well as participation plans with other government agencies and the private sector would be developed under this component. Major fires, beyond the control of State Fire Companies, would be referred to the Federal Task Force, coordinated by the Strategic Nucleus. This Task Force would be responsible for the acquisition and distribution of fire-fighting equipment and provision of training to state and local fire brigades and coordinating simultaneous fire-fighting efforts in different regions. It would maintain a “situation room” on a 24-hour alert during the burning season and would be supported by similar State coordinating bodies. The Strategic Nucleus would be comprised of representatives of MMA, SEPRE, Air Force, Army and, CBMDF.

IV. Project Coordination, Monitoring & Evaluation, and Studies: Under this component, a project coordinating unit (PCU) composed of a multidisciplinary team would be established to manage, monitor and evaluate the day-to-day implementation of the project. This component would also serve as the platform for studies and pilot activities aimed at improving emergency response capacity, developing classifications of emergencies, response hierarchies, communications systems and contingency planning. In addition, this component would also support project monitoring and evaluation activities.

While the project is designed primarily to assist Brazil’s preparation for the risk of fire in the 1998 dry season in the Southern Amazon, it will also contribute to longer-term strengthening of emergency preparedness.

Institutional and Implementation Arrangements

Overall coordination of the project would reside in IBAMA/DIRCOF. IBAMA would provide policy guidance and coordinate links to state and local governments, MMA, the Bank, UNDP and other donors.

IBAMA would staff and equip the PCU with appropriately qualified personnel from IBAMA’s own staff and contracted externally (satisfactory to the Bank and donors). As established in the Portaria signed by IBAMA’s President, the PCU would be subordinated to the Control and Enforcement Directorate (DIRCOF) and would be supervised by the IBAMA’s presidency. The PCU would be responsible for procurement of works, goods, equipment and consulting services. The PCU consist with the following staff: (a) Project Manager; (b) Deputy Project Manager and Chief of Staff; (c) Financial Manager; (d) Procurement Officer; (e) Inter-Institutional Relations Manager; (f) Community Relations Coordinator; (g) Risk Analysis and Monitoring Coordinator; (h) Fire Prevention Coordinator; (i) Fire Suppression Coordinator; and support staff as needed. IBAMA would provide adequate office space, telephones, microcomputers, printers, fax, copying machines, office materials and maintenance. IBAMA would establish an independent unit for monitoring project indicators and performance targets.

IBAMA would staff the would set up the Project Coordination Unit (PCU) with appropriately qualified staff, drawn from in adequate numbers, drawn from IBAMA’s own staff and contracted externally (satisfactory to the Bank and donors). The PCU would have the following officers: (a) Project Manager (reporting to the President of IBAMA); (b) Deputy Project Manager and Chief of Staff; (c) Coordinators for (i) Risk Analysis, (ii) Enforcement, (iii) Fire Prevention, (iv) Fire Suppression, (v) Community Relations; (vi) Intergovernmental and Corporate Relations, (vii) Monitoring and Evaluation; (d) Office Manager, (e) Budget and Accounting Coordinator; (f) Procurement Coordinator; and support staff as needed. IBAMA would provide adequate office space, telephones, microcomputers, printers, fax, copying machines, and office maintenance. These offices would be set up at IBAMA’s main complex or in the Ministry of Environment Headquarters in Brasília.

IBAMA would establish a separate project performance monitoring procedure for monitoring project indicators and performance targets.

Under the direction of the Project Manager and the Deputy Project Manager, the PCU would

  • Identify and hire qualified staff;
  • Prepare an Annual Operating Plan and obtain approval from the Bank;
  • Prepare and disseminate Operational Manuals for each activity and phase of the project;
  • Prepare timetables for each project deliverable (product);
  • Identify appropriate partners to carry out each activity and prepare and sign appropriate operating agreements with adequate financial and operating controls;
  • Manage project funds and keep accounts;
  • Manage and/or supervise the procurement process for all goods and services;
  • Supervise sub-projects, contract and supervise consultants and manage relations with all executing agencies as well as functional links with IBAMA/MMA, the Bank, other federal, state and municipal governments;
  • Plan all major project events including annual work plans and evaluations and audits plan and run the project workshops and disseminate the results;
  • Represent IBAMA and the Federal Government on Federal and Local deliberative and advisory bodies;
  • Report to IBAMA management and the Bank in an appropriate format at agreed intervals;
  • Monitor and evaluate all project activities and issue periodic reports in an agreed format;
  • Ensure transparency and full dissemination of every activity.

Strategic NucleusTask Force and Steering Committee (with TOR satisfactory to the Bank). This unit’s committee membership would include representatives of MMA, SEPRE/ MPO, Army, Air Force, and CBMDFCorpo de Bombeiros (DF), GTA, FETAGRI. The unit Commission would meet at least monthly (or as needed) to deal with regular business and emergencies. The Committee would:

  • provide overall policy guidance for the project;
  • review and coordinate State Action Plans;
  • coordinate federal services in the States
  • review and approve the Annual Operating Plan;
  • ensure close inter-institutional collaboration and coordination;
  • oversee the work of the PCU;
  • review technical and financial reports;
  • advise on important issues arising in the course of the project, especially those of a political and institutional nature.

Project Oversight

An Advisory Group would be established and sustained throughout the life of the project. This Advisory Group would be comprised of representatives of MMA, MPO, the Northern Chapter of the Brazilian Association of Environmental Entities (ABEMA – Zona Norte), and a NGO based in the Legal Amazon. The primary responsibilities of said Group would be to provide policy and technical recommendations for the Project and to monitor Project implementation. The Group would have full access to all records and data pertaining to the Project and would promptly provide the minutes of each meeting to the Bank.

State Fire Civil Defense Committees (CEDECs)Emergency Task Forces

Each State Fire Emergency Task Force (CEDECFETF) would typically include the following agencies and representatives:

  • IBAMA-SUPES and PREVFOGO
  • Governor/Executive Office
  • Planning Secretariat
  • State Forestry Police
  • IBAMA-SUPES and PREVFOGO
  • Health Secretariat
  • Environment Secretariat
  • FUNAI
  • Civil Defense
  • Public Safety/Military Police
  • State Military Fire ComanyDepartmentCorpo de Bombeiros
  • FNS
  • Representatives from two NGOs (chosen by the NGOs)
  • Private Sector representatives

Seven CEDECsFETFs, one for each State in the Arc, would be established by decree from the State Governor. A draft decree would be provided by SINDEC/SEPREIBAMA to the States in order to expedite their formation.

CEDECFETFs would be responsible for:

  • Planning and coordinating fire prevention and suppression activities;
  • Implementing a comprehensive public awareness campaign, including incentives to municipalities and communities that participate in preparedness activities;
  • Ensuring that a comprehensive publicity campaign is in place, including weekly updates on the municipalities that have formed Community Fire Brigades, the equipment they have received, etc. This public ‘reward,’ or Honorary Recognition for Fire Resilience, would serve as an incentive for other municipalities to become involved in the project;
  • Planning and coordinating fire prevention and suppression activities;
  • Ensuring the participation and cooperation of relevant stakeholders, including Municipal Governments, NGOs, civil society organizations, and the private sector;
  • Ensuring that the Municipal Fire Committees, State Emergency Operations Centers, and Community Fire Brigades meet Federal standards.

Municipal Level Organizations

State CEDECs with support from SINDEC/SEPRE/MPO FETFswould promote the establishment of Municipal Civil Defense Committees (COMDECs)Municipal Fire Councils in the highest risk eachmunicipalities y within the Deforestation Arc, composed of relevant Municipal officials and NGO representatives, civil society organizations and the private sector. This council would serve as the liaison between the individual municipalities and the state CEDECFETF.

Each Municipal Fire Council would produce a Municipal Action Plan appropriate to its needs within the guidelines laid down by the Federal Government with the technical assistance of the State CEDECFETF, the Strategic Nucleus and SINDECthe Federal Technical Assistance Consulting Group. The Municipal Action Plan would be submitted to the State CEDECFETF and the Federal Government. Once approved, funds would be released directly to the Municipalities or States. The Action Plan would

  • Present a strategy for coordinating local fire prevention and suppression efforts;
  • Identify and recruit existing technical and human resources, including facilities and equipment that could be leased or hired locally (e.g. tractors, trucks, shovels);
  • Determine the number of community fire brigades needed;
  • Present a detailed strategy for community education, mobilization and training based on local conditions;
  • Identify and incorporate existing community groups, civil society organizations, government agencies and private sector enterprises into all aspects of fire education, mobilization, and prevention;
  • Assign responsibility for daily reporting of fire situation to State Emergency Operations Center.

Community groups wishing to form Fire Brigades would meet the criteria established in the relevant Federal guidelines and Municipal Action Plan (e.g. number of able-bodied volunteers, assessment of equipment needs, time frame of activities). Resources, technical assistance and training manuals for equipping the Community Fire Brigades would be sent directly from IBAMA to the Municipalities.

Military Organizations

As in the case of the Roraima fires, the Brazilian Army and Air Force would be mobilized to combat major fires that are not controllable by State Fire Companies. The Army would provide ground transportation, helicopter support for transporting fire fighters and material, ground communications, field kitchens, field hospitals, and logistical support. The Air Force would provide logistical support by transporting men and material to air strips located near fire suppression sites, and provide helicopter transport for men and material. The military will not engage in actual fire combat.

Fires that burn beyond the capacity of municipal fire brigades will be suppressed by State Military Fire Companies, linked to the State Military Police. Most States in the Arc have a single professional fire-fighting unit. The State of Pará has nine professional companies. Most of these Fire Companies are trained and experienced in the suppression of structural fires, but not wildfires. Under the Project, State Fire Companies would receive specialized wildfire training from members of the Fire Company of the Federal District (CBMDF) which has extensive training and experience in wild fires. CBMDF will also form the nucleus of the Federal Task Force to be mobilized in the event of catastrophic wildfires beyond the capacity of State Fire Companies to control. The Federal Task Force would be complemented, as necessary, by members of the State Fire Companies from Rio de Janeiro, Rio Grande do Sul, Minas Gerais and Paraná, all of which have specialized wildfire training, including training from the USDA Forest Service.

Non-Governmental Organizations

NGOs would be involved at all levels of project implementation. Technically oriented NGOs would provide technical services and expertise for the Risk Assessment and the Fire Prevention Components.

Grass-roots NGOs, including the affiliates of GTA, would provide access to communities and participate directly in the community mobilization, outreach and training aspects of the project under an operating agreement with IBAMA.

Indigenous Groups

Indigenous groups within the Deforestation Arc would be encouraged, through their associations, to form fire brigades and would be included in the outreach, mobilization and training campaigns. FUNAI has made preliminary identification of some nine Indigenous Reserves located with the Deforestation Arc that are at risk to burning. FUNAI would contact all its Regional Administrators (ADRs) within the Deforestation Arc and encourage them to avail themselves of the services and facilities offered by the project and to report any difficulties in accessing such services to a designated official in Brasília who would report such information to the project coordinator.


Top
Back to Annexes

 

24. November 2017/by GFMCadmin

GFMC: The World Bank

world_bank

 

World Bank Logo The World Bank


The mission of the World Bank is fight poverty. An important part of this mission is providing assistance to prepare for and recover from natural or man-made disasters that can result in great human and economic losses. The World Bank Group has established two institutional arrangements in the field of forestry and wildland fire disaster disaster prevention:

  • The Forests Team

  • The Hazard Management Unit (HMU)

  • The ProVention Consortium

 

The Global Fire Monitoring Center is a partner of the ProVention Consortium and thus linked to the work of the Hazard Management Unit (HMU).

 

The history of the World Bank’s involvement in the field of wildland fire disaster management is reflected by the following documents that date back to 1998: 

  • World Bank Finances Emergency Fire Prevention and Control Project in the Amazon Rainforest

  • Amazon Emergency Fire Prevention and Control Project PROARCO

  • World Bank Workshop “Fire Hazards, Transboundary Haze and Sustainable Forestry in East Asia and the Pacific”(Surabaya, Indonesia, 9-12 December 1998)

The most recent World Bank funded fire management project was launched in 2005:

  • Fire Management in High Conservation Value Forests of the Amur-Sikhote-Alin Ecoregion

 

The GFMC has supported the development of this project.

 


Top
Main Menu

 

24. November 2017/by GFMCadmin

Emergency Fire Prevention And Control Project in the Amazon: Annex 3

world_bank

Annex 3

Brazil: Emergency Fire Prevention And Control Project in the Amazon
Estimated Project Costs


Project Component

Local
US $ million

Foreign
US $ million

Total
US $ million

Risk Assessment and Monitoring of Critical Areas 0.4 0 03.2.4 Forest Fire Prevention 6.3 .6 4.56.9 Forest Fire Suppression 6.7 1.8 13.68.5 Project Coordination, Monitoring and Evaluation,
and Studies 2.0 0.1 .752.1 Unallocated 1.7 0 1.7 TOTAL 17.1 2.5 19.6 TOTAL BASELINE COST Physical Contingencies 0.0 0.0 0.0 Price Contingencies .4 0.0 .4 TOTAL PROJECT COST 17.5 2.5 25.520.0


Back to Annexes

 

24. November 2017/by GFMCadmin

Emergency Fire Prevention And Control Project in the Amazon: Annex 4

world_bank

Annex 4

Brazil: Emergency Fire Prevention And Control Project in the Amazon
Cost Benefit Analysis Summary


Estimated Losses from Catastrophic Fire Escapes for 1998

Nb These estimates are based on a number of “heroic” assumptions BasicallyT, the estimated financial cost values of estimated economic losses in Roraima were extrapolated to the Deforestation Arc by multiplying by a factor of five as an estimate of the extent of potential damage, taking into consideration the higher population density, the more dense urban network, greater amounts of cattle and pasture, etc in the arc A number of potential losses were not considered for lack of any basis for estimation These include loss of power generation capacity due to erosion provoked by burning in watersheds, costs of emergency relief to displaced persons, costs for lost and damaged (public and private) infrastructure, losses to agriculture, losses of genetic material (biodiversity), losses to mining operations, losses to extractive producers (babaçu, Brazil nuts, natural rubber), tourism losses (including in areas remote from actual fires due to drifting smoke), losses to commerce and tax losses.

 

Type of Loss Unit Unit Vaue
(US $)
Estimated Number of Units Estimated Cost
(US $)

Type of LossRevenues lost to power companies from damaged power lines

Occurrence

$37,704

235

8,860,440

Revenue Loss to Airlines from Airport Closures

Airport Hours Closed

$2,173

2,100

4,565,217

Lost Income to Airline Passengers Unable to Travel

Passenger Days

$54

315,000

1,710,000

Health-Care Costs to SUS from Excess Respiratory Distress Cases

Patients Cases Requiring Hospital or Clinic Treatment

$18.25

8,280

151,110

Production lost to respiratory disease

Person-days

$20

8,280

165,600

Loss of commercial wood resources

Ha of commercially valuable timber accidentally burned

$8,000

100,000

80,000,000

Loss of Pasture

Ha of productive pasture accidentally burned

$1,000

200,000

20,000,000

Direct Livestock Losses

Head of Cattle

600

10,000

6,000,000

TOTAL

$ 130,312,000


Back to Annexes

 

24. November 2017/by GFMCadmin

Emergency Fire Prevention And Control Project in the Amazon: Annex 5

world_bank

Annex 5

Brazil: Emergency Fire Prevention And Control Project in the Amazon
Financial Summary


The financial management system to be implemented before project effectiveness at IBAMA will be adapted from the systems currently being used by other Bank-financed projects within MMA. This system is structured to provide planning, monitoring and expenditure control. This system has demonstrated its capacity to maintain adequate accounting, financial reporting, and auditing systems to ensure the provision of accurate and timely information regarding project resources and expenditures to project management, auditors and the Bank. Similar systems have been operating in other Bank projects for at least 2 years.

Organizational Chart

https://i1.wp.com/gfmc.online/wp-content/uploads/w_bank_ax5_1-1.gif?resize=383%2C150&ssl=1 (2905 Byte)

 

Financial Management Unit Function

The PCU at IBAMA would include a financial management unit headed by a financial manager. The unit would be responsible for instructing and supporting other executing agencies on financial management budget and expenditure control. An operational manual is being prepared by the project management unit, setting out operational procedures, auditing requirements, the responsibility of the executing agencies and all other financial aspects of project implementation. The executing agencies would report to the Project Coordinator and would be supervised by the Technical Management Unit. They would work based on the Annual Operating Plan (POA), which would describe the main elements of the project executing process. The financial management unit would produce accounting and monitoring reports monthly so that adjustments can be made promptly, if needed.

Financial Management Unit – Staffing

  • A Financial Manager would report directly to the project manager. He would coordinate the unit and support the executing agencies on the implementation of monitoring mechanisms and financial procedures. He would ensure that the Project Coordinator is provided with timely accounting and monitoring reports to facilitate project implementation and monitoring.
  • The Financial Assistant would assist the financial manager in all financial aspects of the project. He/She would be responsible for disbursements, would prepare Statements of Expenditures – SOE, and would generate accounting reports in accordance with international accounting standards, ensuring that they are accurate and timely.
  • The Physical/Financial Monitoring Assistant would assist the financial manager and would be responsible for controlling and monitoring the physical/financial tasks described in the Annual Operating Plan (POA) for each of the executing agencies of PROARCO.

It was agreed with the PCU that all financial staff would be college-educated accountants and they would be trained by a financial manager who has substantial experience with the Bank projects. It was also agreed with the PCU that the financial assistant and the physical financial assistant would be in place prior to loan effectiveness. The implementing units of each project executing agency would also include a qualified financial assistant who would be responsible for providing all project financial information to the management unit.

Accounting System and Procedures

The accounting system would be based on a specific chart of accounts for this project in accordance with the categories described in the Project Appraisal Document (PAD). This system would produce accounting reports reflecting project components defined in the PAD. The system would basically consist of two parts. Part one would be the planning of expenditures; and part two would be the monitoring and control of expenditures. The data would be inputted by the financial management unit as they receive the physical/financial data from the executing agencies. The executing agencies would primarily work with the Annual Operating Plan (POA) and would report the expenditures to the Financial Management Unit so that they can monitor the physical/financial progress of the project. The accounting records would be maintained on a cash basis. The system would provide accurate and timely accounting reports.

Planning and Budgeting

An Annual Operating Plan (POA) would be prepared by each of the executing agencies and would be submitted to the Project Management Unit. Each POA would be revised and inputted into the system under specific codes which would identify the executing agency, the category, the component, and the element of expenditure as described in the PAD. Please refer to Flow of Funds for more details on disbursements aspects.

Project Financial Management Reporting

The format of the accounting reports agreed with IBAMA would show the sources and uses of the funds, variances between actual and planned expenditures, and the uses of funds by project category and executing agency. It would allow the Financial Management Unit to monitor the physical and financial progress of the project. The accounting reports would be produced monthly. An existing accounting system in use for other Bank-financed projects is being adapted to prepare the financial management reports as agreed.

Auditing Requirements

The terms of reference for the audit of this project satisfactory to the Bank would be included in the project operational manual and would be reviewed by the FMS of the Brazil CMU. The Bank’s other projects with MMA (NEP, GEF/FUNBIO/PROBIO) have been audited by the Secretaria Federal de Controle (SFC) and no major issues have been reported. This project would be audited either by SFC or by an independent private auditor, in accordance with the proposal of SFC made to the Bank in the context of the Protocol of Understanding.

Flow of Funds

The Executing Agencies would pay themselves for their acquisitions and would submit financial requests to the Financial Management Unit at IBAMA on their expenditures according to the Annual Operating Plan (POA). IBAMA would advance the funds to the executing agencies from its account through Secretaria do Tesouro Nacional (STN). The Executing Agencies would provide to IBAMA an actual expenditures report and IBAMA would prepare the Statement of Expenditure (SOE) and would send it to STN. STN would then send to the Bank (LOAEL) the application form for withdrawals in order to reimburse themselves from the special account.

 

Financial Summary

Years Ending December 31 (in US$’000 equivalent)

  Implementation Period Total

1998

1999

Project Costs       Investment Costs

7,100

453

7,553

Recurrent Costs

11,500

947

12,447

Total

18,600

1,400

20,000

Financing Sources (% of total project costs) IBRD 14,000

1,000

15,000 Government 4,600 400 5,000 Total 18,600 1,400 20,000


Top
Back to Annexes

 

24. November 2017/by GFMCadmin

Emergency Fire Prevention And Control Project in the Amazon: Annex 6

world_bank

Annex 6

Brazil: Emergency Fire Prevention And Control Project in the Amazon
Procurement and Disbursement Arrangements


Procurement Arrangements

A) Procurement of Contracts to be signed before December 31, 1998

In view of the emergency nature of this project, procurement would be carried out in accordance with Chapter I of the Bank’s Procurement Guidelines. Simplified procedures acceptable to the Bank would be used for contracts signed before December 31, 1998, as follows:

Goods:

Shopping (comparison of at least three quotations) for goods up to an aggregate amount of US$3,500,000. Prior review of technical specifications and vendor lists would be required for lots with an estimated price exceeding US$50,000;

Consulting Services:

Individuals: Selection based on consultant’s qualification for all contracts.

Prior Review of Terms of Reference for all contracts would be required. Full documentation would be required.

Firms: Consultants Qualification (comparison of three firms) for all contracts. Single Source selection for specific exceptional cases with Bank’s prior no objection.

Works

No works will be procured under this project.

B) Procurement of Contracts to be signed after December 31, 1998

Procurement of all goods for contracts signed after December 31, 1998 will be carried out in accordance with the Bank’s Procurement Guidelines (Guidelines: Procurement under IBRD Loans and IDA Credits, version dated January 1995, revised January and August 1996). To the extent possible, goods may be packaged and contracts for such packages estimated to cost in excess of US$350,000 will be procured under International Competitive Bidding (ICB) procedures using the Bank’s Standard Bidding Documents. Other packages of goods whose contracts for such packages are estimated to cost in excess of US$50,000 up to US$350,000 may be procured under National Competitive Bidding (NCB) procedures using standard bidding documents acceptable to the World Bank (Standard NCB models will be provided by the World Bank). Goods costing up to US$50,000 may be procured under International Shopping, up to aggregate amount of US$3,500,000. With respect to each contract for goods estimated to cost the equivalent of more than US$50,000 the procedures set forth in paragraphs 2 and 3 of Appendix 1 to the Guidelines shall apply.

Consulting services from firms will be procured in accordance with Quality- and Cost-Based Selection (QCBS) procedures. Complex or highly specialized assignments may be procured under Quality-Based Selection (QBS). Simple assignments not exceeding the equivalent of US$200,000 that can be precisely defined may be selected under a fixed budget. Assignments of a standard or routine nature not exceeding the equivalent of US$100,000 may be procured under least-cost selection procedures. Individual consultants will be selected on the basis of their qualifications. These procedures are described in the Bank’s Guidelines: Selection and Employment of Consultants by World Bank Borrowers, version dated January 1997, revised September 1997. All Terms of Reference, independently of their estimated cost, will be subject to prior review by the Bank. With respect to consulting services contracted with firms estimated to cost the equivalent of US$100,000 or more, the procedures set forth in paragraphs 2 and 3 of Appendix 1 to the Guidelines shall apply. With respect to consulting services contracted with individuals estimated to cost the equivalent of US$50,000 or more, the individual consultant’s qualifications and contract will be subject to prior review by the Bank.

 

Annex 6, Table A: Project Costs by Procurement Arrangements (in US$’000 equivalent)

   

Procurement Method

Total

International
Shopping

Direct
Contracting

Consulting
Services

N.B.F.

A. GOODS 1. Vehicles

720.0
(576.0)

–

–

–

720.0
(576.0)

2. Field Equipment

3,937.8
(2,526.7)

–

–

–

3,937.8
(2,526.7)

3. Office Equipment

77.2
(61.7)

–

–

–

77.2
(61.7)

B. TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE 1. Local Consultants

–

–

2,818.4
(2,818.4)

–

2,818.4
(2,818.4)

D. INCREMENTAL RECURRENT COSTS 1. Operating Costs

–

12,276.6
(9,017.1)

–

–

12,276.6
(9,017.1)

2. Maintenance of Equipment

–

170.0

–

–

170.0

TOTAL

4,735.0
(3,164.4)

12,446.6
(9,017.1)

2,818.4
(2,818.4)

–
–

20,000.0
(15,000.0)

 

Note: N.B.F. = Not Bank-financed (includes elements procured under parallel cofinancing procedures, consultancies under trust funds, any reserved procurement, and any other miscellaneous items). The procurement arrangement for the items listed under “Other” and details of the items listed as “N.B.F.” need to be explained in footnotes to the table or in the text.

Figures in parenthesis are the amounts to be financed by the Bank loan/IDA credit

 

Annex 6, Table A1: Consultant Selection Arrangements (optional) (in US$million equivalent)

Consultant Services Expenditure Category Selection Method Total Cost (including contingencies) QCBS QBS SFB LCS CQ Other N.B.F. A. Firms 0.5             0.5 B. Individuals         1.4     1.4 Total 0.5       1.4     1.9

 Note:
QCBS = Quality- and Cost-Based Selection
QBS = Quality-based Selection
SFB = Selection under a Fixed Budget
LCS = Least-Cost Selection
CQ = Selection Based on Consultants’ Qualifications
Other = Selection of individual consultants (per Section V of Consultants Guidelines), Commercial Practices, etc.
N.B.F. = Not Bank-financed.

 

Annex 6, Table B: Thresholds for Procurement Methods and Prior Review *

Expenditure
Category

Contract Value
(Threshold)

Procurement
Method

Contracts Subject to
Prior Review / Estimated Total Value Subject to Prior Review

US $ thousands

US $ millions

Contracts signed prior to December 31, 1998
1. Goods First US$ 3.5 M. by International Shopping   >350 ICB Prior Review  

50 to 350

NCB (up to an aggregate value of US$3.5 M.) Prior Review of Specifications and Quotations   <50 International Shopping

(except for tires, fuel, foodstuffs and other consumable goods which may be procured by National Shopping, up to an aggregate value of US$3.5 M.)

Prior Review of Specifications and Quotations In locations where less than three suppliers are available <25 Direct Contracting

(up to an aggregate value of US$1 M.)

None 2. Services Firms   QCBS Prior Review of Short-list and LOI Individuals   CQ Prior Review of TORs Contracts signed after December 31, 1998 1. Goods   >350 ICB Prior Review  

50 to 350

NCB Prior Review of Specifications and Quotations   <50 National Shopping Prior Review of Specifications and Quotations 2. Services Firms   QCBS Prior Review of Short-list and LOI Individuals   CQ Prior Review of TORs

* (Thresholds generally differ by country and project. Consult OD 11.04 “Review of Procurment Documentation” and contact the Regional Procurement Aviser for guidance.

 

Annex 6, Table C: Allocation of Loan Proceeds (in US$’000 equivalent)

 

Project Total Amount

Bank Financing %

Amount

I. Investment Costs      A. GOODS

  1. Vehicles

  2. Field Equipment

  3. Office Equipment

720.0

3,937.8

77.2

80.0

64.2

80.0

576.0

2,526.7

61.7

Subtotal GOODS

4,735.0

66.8

3,164.4

     B. TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE

  1. National Consultants

2,818.4

100.0

2,818.4

Total Investment Costs

7,553.4

79.2

5,982.8

II. Recurrent Costs      A. INCREMENTAL RECURRENT COSTS

  1. Operating Costs

  2. Maintenance of Equipment

12,276.6

170.0

73.4

–

9,017.1

–

Total Recurrent Costs

12,446.6

72.4

9,017.1

Total

20,000.0

75.0

15,000.0


Top
Back to Annexes

 

24. November 2017/by GFMCadmin

Brazil: Emergency Fire Prevention And Control Project in the Amazon: Annex 7

world_bank

Annex 7

Brazil: Emergency Fire Prevention And Control Project in the Amazon
Project Processing Budget and Schedule


A. Project Budget (US$000)

Planned

Actual

115

115

B. Project Schedule

Planned N/A

Actual

Time taken to prepare the project (months)

2

4

First Bank mission (identification)

April 21, 1998

April 21, 1998

Appraisal mission departure

July 27, 1998

July 27, 1998

Negotiations

August 5, 1998

August 17-19, 1998

Planned Date of Effectiveness

September 1, 1998

Prepared by: IBAMA, Consultants  

Bank staff who worked on the project include:

Name

Specialty

Daniel R. Gross, Task Manager Senior Anthropologist Ricardo Tarifa, Co-Task Manager Consultant – Natural Resources Management Robert Schneider, Sector Leader Principal Economist John Redwood Lead Specialist, Environment Irani Escolano Procurement Specialist Túlio Henrique Lima Correa Consultant – Financial Management Specialist Renan Poveda Consultant – Environmental Management Specialist Andrew Hurd Consultant – Development Management Specialist David Gray Consultant – Environmental Information Specialist


Back to Annexes

 

24. November 2017/by GFMCadmin

Brazil: Emergency Fire Prevention And Control Project in the Amazon: Annex 8

world_bank

Annex 8

Brazil: Emergency Fire Prevention And Control Project in the Amazon
Documents in the Project File


Benatti, José Heder and Ana Cristina Barros. 1998. Prevenção ás Queimadas Acidentais na Amazônia. Belém, Pará, Brazil: IPAM.

Confederação Nacional da Indústria. 1998. Incêndios no Estado de Roraima – Relatório. Brazil.

Corpo de Bombeiros do Estado do Rio de Janeiro. 1994. IBAMA – USDA Forest Service Exchange Program: A Report of Three Years of Activities. Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.

IBAMA. 1998. Cartilha: O Verde é a Cor do Brasil. Brasília, Brazil.

IBAMA/MMA. 1998. PROARCO – Programa de Prevenção e Controle ás Queimadas e aos Incêndios Florestais no Arco do Desflorestamento. Brasília, Brazil.

IBAMA/MMA. 1998. Roraima – Avaliação de Impacto Ambiental. Brasília, Brazil.

IPAM. 1998. Fogo Reincidente na Amazônia – as Condições Naturais da Floresta Levam a Problemas Cada Vez Mais Graves. Belém, Pará, Brazil.

Mutch, Robert W. 1995. Fire Management in Brazil: Sustaining productive Ecosystems for People – Future Expectations for PREVFOGO (Consultant Report). Brasilia, Brazil: UNDP.

Mutch, Robert W. 1998. PROARCO – Final Consultant Report. Washington DC: The World Bank.


Top
Back to Annexes

 

24. November 2017/by GFMCadmin

Brazil: Emergency Fire Prevention And Control Project in the Amazon: Annex 9

world_bank

Annex 9

Brazil: Emergency Fire Prevention And Control Project in the Amazon
Statement of Loans and Credits


Table A: Status of Bank Group Operations in Brazil

Project ID Loan or Credit No. Fiscal
Year
Purpose Original Amount in US$ Millions Difference between expected and actual disbursements * IBRD IDA Cancellations Undisbursed Orig Frm Rev`d Number of Closed Loans/credits: 206 Active Loans BR-PE-35728 IBRD42320 1998 BAHIA WTR RESOURCES 51.00 0.00 0.00 51.00 0.00 0.00 BR-PE-38947 IBRD42660

1998

SC. & TECH 3

155.00

0.00

0.00

155.00

0.00

0.00

BR-PE-39197 IBRD42110

1998

RJ ST.PRIV.

250.00

0.00

0.00

250.00

137.50

0.00

BR-PE-42565 IBRD42510

1998

PARAIBA R.POVERTY

60.00

0.00

0.00

60.00

0.00

0.00

BR-PE-48357 IBRD42450

1998

CEN.BANK TAL

20.00

0.00

0.00

20.00

0.00

0.00

BR-PE-51701 IBRD42520

1998

MARANHAO R.POVERTY

80.00

0.00

0.00

80.00

0.00

0.00

BR-PE-6474 IBRD42380

1998

LAND MGT 3(SP)

55.00

0.00

0.00

55.00

0.00

0.00

BR-PE-6549 IBRD42650

1998

GAS SCTR DEV PROJECT

130.00

0.00

0.00

130.00

0.00

0.00

BR-PE-34578 IBRD41650

1997

RGS HWY MGT

70.00

0.00

0.00

70.00

4.67

0.00

BR-PE-38896 IBRD41200

1997

R.POVERTY(RGN)

24.00

0.00

0.00

21.24

2.71

0.00

BR-PE-39196 IBRD41390

1997

RGS ST.REFORM

125.00

0.00

0.00

75.00

30.00

0.00

BR-PE-42566 IBRD41220

1997

R.POVERTY(PE)

39.00

0.00

0.00

33.61

5.56

0.00

BR-PE-43868 IBRD41480

1997

RGS LAND MGT/POVERTY

100.00

0.00

0.00

97.00

6.87

0.00

BR-PE-43871 IBRD41210

1997

(PIAUI)R.POVERTY

30.00

0.00

0.00

26.67

4.17

0.00

BR-PE-43873 IBRD41690

1997

AG TECH DEV.

60.00

0.00

0.00

56.01

6.96

0.00

BR-PE-46052 IBRD41900

1997

CEARA WTR PILOT

9.60

0.00

0.00

9.60

0.00

0.00

BR-PE-48870 IBRD41890

1997

MT STATE PRIV.

45.00

0.00

0.00

45.00

4.17

0.00

BR-PE-6475 IBRD41470

1997

LAND RFM PILOT

90.00

0.00

0.00

75.05

-3.85

0.00

BR-PE-6532 IBRD41880

1997

FED HWY DECENTR

300.00

0.00

0.00

300.00

13.34

0.00

BR-PE-6562 IBRD41400

1997

BAHIA MUN.DV

100.00

0.00

0.00

98.98

5.65

0.00

BR-PE-37828 IBRD40600

1996

(PR)R.POVERTY

175.00

0.00

0.00

175.00

67.93

0.00

BR-PE-40028 IBRD4046A

1996

RAILWAYS RESTRUCTURG

151.48

0.00

0.00

142.62

.95

0.00

BR-PE-6512 IBRD39240

1996

ENV/CONS(CVRD)

50.00

0.00

0.00

31.07

4.93

0.00

BR-PE-6547 IBRD3633A

1996

METRO TRANSP. RIO

47.48

0.00

0.00

37.22

37.57

0.00

BR-PE-6554 IBRD40470

1996

HLTH SCTR REFORM

300.00

0.00

0.00

261.09

64.41

0.00

BR-PE-35717 IBRD39170

1995

RURAL POV. (BAHIA)

105.00

0.00

0.00

65.51

8.20

0.00

BR-PE-38882 IBRD3915A

1995

RECIFE M.TSP

98.72

0.00

0.00

98.72

42.80

0.00

BR-PE-38884 IBRD39180

1995

RURAL POV.- CEARA

70.00

0.00

0.00

49.77

8.17

0.00

BR-PE-38885 IBRD39190

1995

RURAL POV.-SERGIPE

36.00

0.00

0.00

21.27

1.26

0.00

BR-PE-6436 IBRD37890

1995

CEARA UR.DV/WATER CO

140.00

0.00

0.00

111.59

68.92

-2.16

BR-PE-6564 IBRD3916A

1995

BELO H M.TSP

83.32

0.00

0.00

83.32

42.78

0.00

BR-PE-6564 IBRD39160

1995

BELO H M.TSP

15.68

0.00

0.00

.36

42.78

0.00

BR-PE-6452 IBRD36630

1994

NE BASIC EDUC III

206.60

0.00

0.00

88.21

60.34

0.00

BR-PE-6522 IBRD37670

1994

ESP.SANTO WATER

154.00

0.00

0.00

90.30

59.06

0.00

BR-PE-6524 IBRD36390

1994

MINAS MNC.DEVELOPMT

150.00

0.00

5.00

40.23

33.88

0.00

BR-PE-6543 IBRD37330

1994

M. GERAIS BASIC EDUC

150.00

0.00

0.00

56.60

13.93

0.00

BR-PE-6546 IBRD36590

1994

AIDS CONTROL

160.00

0.00

0.00

16.40

1.58

0.00

BR-PE-6555 IBRD37130

1994

STE HWY MGT II

54.00

0.00

18.00

18.48

3.67

-21.52

BR-PE-6555 IBRD37150

1994

STE HWY MGT II

79.00

0.00

18.00

7.52

3.67

-21.52

BR-PE-6558 IBRD37660

1994

PARANA BASIC EDUC

96.00

0.00

0.00

29.01

-3.67

0.00

BR-PE-6378 IBRD35470

1993

STATE HWY MGMT

50.00

0.00

0.00

5.58

26.76

-1.38

BR-PE-6378 IBRD35480

1993

STATE HWY MGMT

38.00

0.00

18.00

6.53

26.76

-1.38

BR-PE-6427 IBRD36040

1993

NE BASIC EDUC II

212.00

0.00

0.00

57.96

39.02

0.00

BR-PE-6540 IBRD35540

1993

WTR Q/PLN(MINAS GERA

145.00

0.00

5.00

25.68

30.67

-12.53

BR-PE-6541 IBRD35030

1993

WTR Q/PLN(SP/PARANA)

9.00

0.00

0.00

5.60

93.17

0.00

BR-PE-6541 IBRD35040

1993

WTR Q/PLN(SP/PARANA)

119.00

0.00

0.00

38.54

93.17

0.00

BR-PE-6541 IBRD35050

1993

WTR Q/PLN(SP/PARANA)

117.00

0.00

0.00

49.05

93.17

0.00

BR-PE-6547 IBRD36330

1993

METRO TRANSP. RIO

81.02

0.00

0.00

.34

37.57

0.00

BR-PE-6368 IBRD3442A

1992

WATER SECTOR MODERNI

69.62

0.00

0.00

57.93

58.39

0.00

BR-PE-6368 IBRD3442S

1992

WATER SECTOR MODERNI

167.88

0.00

0.00

.46

58.39

0.00

BR-PE-6379 IBRD3457S

1992

METRO TRANSP.SPAULO

119.70

0.00

0.00

5.20

5.21

0.00

BR-PE-6505 IBRD34920

1992

MATO GROSSO NAT RES

205.00

0.00

0.00

88.77

88.77

0.00

BR-PE-6364 IBRD33750

1991

INNOV BASIC ED

245.00

0.00

0.00

44.24

44.24

0.00

BR-PE-6492 IBRD33760

1991

HYDROCARBN TRNSP/PRO

260.00

0.00

0.00

8.81

8.80

0.00

BR-PE-6446 IBRD31730

1990

NAT ENVIRONMT

117.00

0.00

0.00

26.59

26.61

0.00

BR-PE-6453 IBRD31700

1990

NE IRRIG I

210.00

0.00

69.00

31.94

100.96

31.96

BR-PE-6473 IBRD31600

1990

LND MGMT II-S. CATAR

33.00

0.00

0.00

5.33

5.38

0.00

BR-PE-6370 IBRD30130

1989

NE IRRI JAIBA

71.00

0.00

0.00

5.58

5.59

0.00

BR-PE-6414 IBRD30430

1989

NTRL GAS DIST

94.00

0.00

0.00

5.09

5.07

0.00

Total       6,479.10 0.00 133.00 3,602.67 1,628.61 -28.53

   

Active Loans

Closed Loans

Total

Total Disbursed (IBRD and IDA): 2,743.40 15,768.39 18,511.79 of which has been repaid: 203.09 12,311.36 12,514.45 Total now held by IBRD and IDA: 6,143.00 3,508.06 9,651.06 Amount sold : 0.00 45.83 45.83 Of which repaid : 0.00 45.83 45.83 Total Undisbursed : 3,602.67 51.05 3,653.72

*

Intended disbursements to date minus actual disbursements to date as projected at appraisal.

 

Table B: Statement of IFC’s Committed and Disbursed Portfolio
As of 31-Jan-98
(In US Dollar Millions)

FY Approval

Company

Committed Disbursed IFC IFC

Loan

Equity

Quasi

Partic

Loan

Equity

Quasi

Partic

1973/78/83

CODEMIN

0.00

4.34

0.00

0.00

0.00

4.34

0.00

0.00

1975/96

Oxiteno NE

30.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

30.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

1980/87/97

Ipiranga

40.00

6.32

0.00

0.00

0.00

6.32

0.00

0.00

1980/88

OPP

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

1980/92

DENPASA

.29

1.00

.12

0.00

.29

1.03

.05

0.00

1981

Brasilpar

0.00

.04

0.00

0.00

0.00

.04

0.00

0.00

1982/84/86

PISA

0.00

3.90

0.00

0.00

0.00

3.90

0.00

0.00

1982/86

Cimento Caue

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

1983

SOCOCO

0.00

0.00

2.50

0.00

0.00

0.00

2.50

0.00

1984

ALQUIM

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

1987/92/96

MBR

12.67

0.00

10.00

14.83

12.67

0.00

10.00

14.83

1987/96

Perdigao

32.81

10.00

0.00

18.00

32.81

10.00

0.00

18.00

1987/96/97

Duratex

22.00

0.00

0.00

78.00

22.00

0.00

0.00

78.00

1987/97

SP Alpargatas

25.00

0.00

5.00

0.00

20.70

0.00

5.00

0.00

1989

COPENE

4.55

0.00

0.00

0.00

4.55

0.00

0.00

0.00

1989

ELUMA

0.00

0.00

3.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

3.00

0.00

1989

Politeno Linear

1.70

0.00

0.00

0.00

1.70

0.00

0.00

0.00

1990

ENGEPOL

1.53

0.00

0.00

0.00

1.53

0.00

0.00

0.00

1990

Ripasa

5.71

5.00

0.00

0.00

5.71

5.00

0.00

0.00

1990/91/92

Bahia Sul

18.57

20.97

0.00

10.00

18.57

20.97

0.00

10.00

1991

Bradesco-AL

26.03

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

1991

Bradesco-Bahia

5.25

0.00

0.00

0.00

5.25

0.00

0.00

0.00

1991

Bradesco-Eucatex

7.50

0.00

0.00

0.00

7.50

0.00

0.00

0.00

1991

Bradesco-Petrofl

7.50

0.00

0.00

0.00

7.50

0.00

0.00

0.00

1991

Bradesco-Romi

2.38

.40

0.00

0.00

2.38

.40

0.00

0.00

1991

Rhodia-Ster

10.00

5.95

0.00

0.00

10.00

5.95

0.00

0.00

1992

CRP-Caderi

0.00

2.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

.75

0.00

0.00

1992/93

TRIKEM

0.00

12.86

0.00

0.00

0.00

12.86

0.00

0.00

1993

BACELL

12.50

10.70

0.00

25.20

12.50

10.70

0.00

25.20

1993

Coteminas

0.00

4.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

4.00

0.00

0.00

1993

CEBRACTEX

1.80

0.00

0.00

0.00

1.80

0.00

0.00

0.00

1993

Macedo Alimentos

17.67

0.00

0.00

0.00

17.67

0.00

0.00

0.00

1993

Votorantim

15.57

0.00

0.00

1.29

15.57

0.00

0.00

1.29

1993/96

CEVAL

56.21

20.00

0.00

131.29

56.21

20.00

0.00

131.29

1994

GAVEA

10.31

0.00

5.50

0.00

10.31

0.00

5.50

0.00

1994

GP Capital

0.00

18.50

0.00

0.00

0.00

18.46

0.00

0.00

1994

Para Pigmentos

30.00

9.00

0.00

35.00

25.50

8.14

0.00

29.75

1994

Portobello

15.79

5.00

0.00

0.00

15.79

5.00

0.00

0.00

1994/95/97

Sadia

52.00

10.00

10.00

206.66

52.00

10.00

10.00

206.66

1994/96

CHAPECO

25.00

0.00

0.00

5.00

25.00

0.00

0.00

5.00

1994/96

S.A.I.C.C.

0.00

7.85

6.87

0.00

0.00

7.70

6.87

0.00

1995

Bradesco-Hering

7.50

0.00

0.00

0.00

7.50

0.00

0.00

0.00

1995

Brahma – BRA

32.50

0.00

0.00

86.10

32.50

0.00

0.00

86.10

1995

Cambuhy/MC

22.50

0.00

0.00

0.00

22.50

0.00

0.00

0.00

1995

Lojas Americana

28.00

0.00

5.00

18.00

28.00

0.00

5.00

18.00

1995

LATASA – Brazil

17.00

0.00

0.00

3.50

17.00

0.00

0.00

3.50

1995

Politeno Ind.

17.54

0.00

0.00

0.00

17.54

0.00

0.00

0.00

1995

Rhodiaco/PTA

27.50

0.00

0.00

27.00

27.50

0.00

0.00

27.00

1995/96

Globocabo

35.00

18.06

0.00

118.00

35.00

18.06

0.00

118.00

1996

Banco Bradesco

40.00

0.00

0.00

60.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

1996

Banco Liberal

10.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

1996

Mallory

8.00

3.96

0.00

0.00

8.00

3.96

0.00

0.00

1996

TIGRE

25.00

0.00

5.00

23.50

25.00

0.00

5.00

23.50

1996/97

Lightel

25.00

18.17

0.00

0.00

25.00

18.17

0.00

0.00

1997

Wentex

15.00

10.00

0.00

20.00

15.00

10.00

0.00

20.00

1997

Bompreco

25.00

0.00

5.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

1997

Copesul

40.00

0.00

0.00

180.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

1997

Rodovia

35.00

0.00

0.00

79.50

15.28

0.00

0.00

34.72

1997

Samarco

18.00

0.00

0.00

16.00

18.00

0.00

0.00

16.00

1997

Sucorrico

15.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

15.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

1998

BSC

14.00

0.00

0.00

7.50

14.00

0.00

0.00

7.50

1998

Empesca

25.00

0.00

10.00

0.00

5.00

0.00

10.00

0.00

Total Portfolio:

972.88

208.02

67.99

1,164.37

743.33

205.75

62.92

874.34

 

 

  

Approvals Pending Commitment

Loan

Equity

Quasi

Partic

1996 AGUAS LIMEIRA

17.00

1.00

0.00

23.00

1998 BANCO ICATU

30.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

1997 COPESUL BLINC.

0.00

0.00

0.00

45.00

1997 CTBC

35.00

0.00

0.00

150.00

1996 GLOBOCABO II

0.00

0.00

0.00

38.00

1997 GUILMAN-AMORIM

30.00

0.00

0.00

90.00

1998 ICATU EQUITY

0.00

30.00

0.00

0.00

1997 IPIRANGA EXPANS.

0.00

0.00

5.00

0.00

1997 IPIRANGA RI

0.00

.32

0.00

0.00

1998 LOJAS RENNER

16.00

4.00

0.00

0.00

1997 NOVA DUTRA BLINC

0.00

0.00

0.00

10.00

1996 OXITENO/ETHYLO

0.00

5.00

0.00

0.00

1998 SARAIVA

15.00

3.00

0.00

0.00

1997 SP ALPARGATAS II

0.00

0.00

0.00

30.00

1998 TRIKEM II

25.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

1997 UNIBANCO LIVESTO

50.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

1998 VARGA

20.00

0.00

3.00

15.00

Total Pending Commitment:

238.00

43.32

8.00

401.00


Back to Annexes

 

24. November 2017/by GFMCadmin

Currency Equivalents & Abbreviations and Acronyms

world_bank

 

Currency Equivalents

&

Abbreviations and Acronyms


Currency Equivalents

(Exchange Rate Effective May 30, 1998)

Currency Unit

=

Real (R$)

R$ 1.15

=

US$ 1.00

 

Fiscal Year

January 1 – December 31

 

Abbreviations and Acronyms

ADR FUNAI Regional Administration CAS Country Assistance Strategy CBMDF Federal District Military Fire Department CEDEC State Civil Defense Committee COMDEC Municipal Civil Defense Committee DIRCOF IBAMAControl and Enforcement Directorate of IBAMA Environmental Control and Enforcement Department FNMA National Environmental Fund (MMA-IDB) FNS National Health Foundation FUNAI National Indian Foundation, Ministry of Justice GOB Government of Brazil GTA Amazon Working Group (NGO) IBAMA Brazilian Institute for the Environment and Renewable Natural Resources ICB International Competitive Bidding IDB Inter-American Development Bank INPE Brazil National Space Research Institute IPAM Amazon Environmental Research Institute (NGO) MMA Ministry of Environment, Water Resources and the Legal AmazonLegal Amazonia MPO Brazil Ministry of Planning and Budget NCB National Competitive Bidding NEP National Environmental Project NGO Non-Governmental Organization NRPP Natural Resource Policy Program of the G-7 Pilot Project to Conserve the Brazilian Rain Forest OEMA State Environmental Agency PCU Project Coordination Unit PDA Demonstration Project of the G-7 Pilot Project to Conserve the Brazilian Rain Forest PED Decentralized Matching Grant Project of NEP PLANAFLORO Rondônia Rondonia- Natural Resources Management Project PPG7 Pilot Program to Conserve the Brazilian Rain Forest PREVFOGO Wildlands Fire Protection Project (IBAMA) PROARCO Program for the Prevention and Control of Forest Fires in the Deforestation Arc in the Amazon PROBIO National Biodiversity Program PRODEAGRO Mato Grosso – Natural Resources Management Project PRODESQUE Fire and Deforestation Control Project of the G-7 Pilot Project to Conserve the Brazilian Rain Forest RFT Rain Forest Trust Fund SEPRE Secretariat for Regional Affairs – MPO SINDEC National Civil Defense System, SEPRE – MPO SUPES IBAMA State Superintendency UNDP United Nations Development Program VAT Value Added Tax

 

Vice President:

Shahid Javed Burki

Country Director:

Gobind T. . Nankani

Sector Director:

Maritta Koch-Weser

Task Managers:

Daniel Gross & Ricardo Tarifa


Top
Back

 

24. November 2017/by GFMCadmin
Page 2 of 3123

 

 

 


SVC Commitment by GFMC

 


International Wildfire Emergency Assistance

 

  • Impressum
  • Datenschutzerklärung

© Global Fire Monitoring Center (GFMC) / Fire Ecology Research Group
All materials produced by GFMC or IFFN must be quoted properly. Copyrights of materials provided by other organizations or publications and websites hyperlinked with this website must be observed. It is not permitted to publish or otherwise use photographs produced by the GFMC and other providers without a written permission.

powered by newline-medien

WP-Backgrounds Lite by InoPlugs Web Design and Juwelier Schönmann 1010 Wien
Scroll to top