September (All News)
Recent Media Highlights on Fire, Policies, and Politics
Recent Media Highlights on Fire, Policies, and Politics
30 September 2023
Published by: https://canberraweekly.com.au
AUSTRALIA – The ACT marks the start of the bushfire season this Sunday, 1 October. The ACT Emergency Services Agency (ESA) will enact Fire Danger Rating Signs and mandatory fire permits, and may declare Total Fire Bans on days of severe fire danger in the region.
ACT Rural Fire Service (ACTRFS) Chief Officer Rohan Scott said these actions reduce the risk of fires starting and help the community to understand the risks of fire if one does start.
“We cannot be complacent in the face of increased fire danger,” Chief Officer Scott said. “Preparation and vigilance are our best defence. Check the daily Fire Danger Rating, secure your fire permits, and adhere to Total Fire Bans when declared.
“Throughout the bushfire season, the ACTRFS and ESA are committed to working in partnership with the community to enhance resilience and preparedness.
“1 October is a great time to revisit your Emergency Survival Plan and have a discussion with your household about what you will do in a bushfire emergency. The ESA website has a range of resources to help you discuss and plan.”
For more information on being emergency ready this bushfire season, visit www.esa.act.gov.au.
ACT residents in rural or country areas who need to apply for a fire permit should contact the ACTRFS at 6207 8609 or email rfs@act.gov.au.
30 September 2023
Published by: https://www.weatherzone.com.au
AUSTRALIA – Bushfires are a recurring and devastating event in Australia, causing significant damage to the environment, wildlife and communities. Understanding the causes of bushfires and how they start is essential for prevention and mitigation efforts. In this article, we will explore the primary causes of bushfires in Australia, including natural factors, human activities and the role of climate change. We will also discuss fire safety measures, preparation for bushfires and government initiatives to address this issue.
Bushfires, a common phenomenon in the Australian landscape, often start naturally, with one of the primary triggers being lightning strikes. When a thunderstormpasses overhead, lightning can strike the earth, generating intense heat that can ignite dry vegetation. This is particularly probable in areas that have experienced a prolonged period of drought, where dried-out plants and grass provide perfect fuel for a fire.
Australia’s eucalyptus forests are especially susceptible to bushfires due to the trees’ oil-rich leaves. The heat from a lightning strike or existing bushfire can cause the volatile oils in eucalyptus leaves to evaporate and form a gas. This gas can then ignite, forming a fireball and setting alight the surrounding trees.
Moreover, Australia’s hot, dry summers combined with its frequent high winds create perfect conditions for bushfires to spread rapidly. Once a fire starts, the wind can carry burning debris and embers up to kilometres away, igniting new fires in different areas and causing the original fire to spread.
Human activities can also contribute to the occurrence of bushfires. These include accidental ignition, such as discarded cigarettes or unattended campfires, or deliberate acts of arson. Irresponsible behaviour, negligence and intentional fire-starting incidents can have severe consequences, endangering lives and property. Promoting responsible behaviour and fire safety measures is crucial to minimising human-caused bushfires.
Australia has experienced its fair share of devastating bushfires. Throughout history, several notable bushfire events have left indelible marks on the country’s landscape and collective memory. Recent bushfires include the tragic Black Saturday Bushfires in 2009 and the catastrophic Black Summer Bushfires in 2019/20, which serve as a reminder of the destructive power bushfires can cause to the Australian landscape and community.
The Black Thursday Bushfires occurred on February 6, 1851. Fueled by prolonged drought and extreme weather conditions, these fires ravaged around one quarter of what is now the state of Victoria, scorching millions of hectares of land and causing widespread devastation.
In February 1983, the Ash Wednesday Bushfires struck southeastern Australia and caused widespread destruction in Victoria and South Australia. Powerful winds, extreme heat and an abundance of dry fuel following a prolonged drought, allowed the fires to spread quickly. The Ash Wednesday Bushfires resulted in significant loss of life and property, forever etching themselves into the nation’s memory.
The Black Saturday Bushfires, which occurred on February 7, 2009, remain one of the darkest chapters in Australia’s bushfire history. Raging across Victoria, these fires claimed the lives of 173 people, destroyed thousands of homes and properties and left entire communities devastated. The impact of the Black Saturday Bushfires continues to shape the country’s approach to bushfire prevention and management.
From July 2019 to March 2020, Australia experienced the relentless fury of the Black Summer Bushfires. These fires, which ravaged multiple states, including New South Wales, Victoria and South Australia, were fueled by extreme heat waves, prolonged drought and strong winds. The Black Summer Bushfires resulted in widespread destruction of land, wildlife and property, leaving an indelible mark on the nation’s psyche.
While these notable bushfires in Australian history evoke sombre memories, they also serve as reminders of resilience and the need for preparedness. The lessons learned from these events have spurred advancements in fire management, community awareness and emergency response systems. In the face of future challenges, Australia remains committed to protecting its people, wildlife and precious natural landscapes.
Climate change plays a role in exacerbating the risk and severity of bushfires in Australia. Rising temperatures and changing weather patterns are increasing the likelihood of dangerous bushfire weather in some parts of Australia. Scientific research and expert opinions support the link between climate change and the increasing frequency and severity of bushfires in Australia.
Living in Australia means being aware of the risks associated with bushfires. Preparation is key to ensuring the safety of yourself, your family and your property. Always check the Australian Fire Danger Rating System (AFDRS) for your district and follow the appropriate advice for each level of threat.
The AFDRS is the official fire danger ratings used by state governments in Australia. To find out more about these ratings and how to read them, see our guide here.
Below are some more essential steps to help you prepare for a bushfire in Australia. These tips are based on guidelines provided by state government fire services.
One of the first steps in bushfire preparation is clearing and maintaining your property to minimise potential fire hazards. Here are some important measures to consider:
You can find further information on fire prevention and preparation on your state government’s fire safety website.
Understanding how bushfires progress is essential for prevention, preparedness and response efforts. Let’s take a closer look at the process:
During a bushfire, following proper safety procedures is crucial. Here are some important steps to take:
Understanding how most bushfires start in Australia is crucial for preventing and responding effectively to these devastating events. While natural causes like lightning strikes contribute significantly to bushfire occurrences, human-related factors, including arson and accidental ignition, also play a significant role. Climate change further exacerbates fire conditions, making the risk of bushfires even more pronounced. By taking precautions, adhering to fire safety measures and supporting government initiatives, we can work towards minimising the occurrence and impact of bushfires, ultimately protecting Australia’s landscapes, wildlife and communities.
30 September 2023
Published by: https://www.bbc.com
UNITED KINGDOM – The UK is “woefully underprepared” to tackle wildfires as climate change makes them more likely, a new report by the Fire Brigades Union warns.
There were more than 44,000 wildfires last year – an increase of 72% on the previous year, according to government figures out this month.
Union chiefs say the government and the National Fire Chiefs Council have failed to develop a national strategy.
The government said it was ensuring services have the resources needed.
A spokesperson for the NFCC said it “has consistently made clear to government and fire service partners that the impact of climate change will continue to put huge pressure on fire and rescue services in the years ahead”.
Climate change is making the weather conditions needed for wildfires to spread more likely, according to the UN’s climate body, the IPCC. Extreme and long-lasting heat like that seen in the UK in the summer of 2022 draws more and more moisture out of the ground and vegetation.
The Fire Brigades Union (FBU) report found understaffing meant fire services tackling recent wildfires have had to leave fire engines sitting idle in stations and call in off-duty staff to work extra shifts, while firefighters at the scene were “worked to exhaustion”.
It estimates that 12,000 firefighter jobs have been lost since 2010.
Matt Wrack, the FBU’s general secretary, said: “We need urgent climate action. If we are to properly protect life and property from wildfires, the fire and rescue service needs significant investment.
“This means more firefighters, better equipped and trained, along with better planning, research and coordination.”
Many wildfires burn where the countryside meets the urban edge
The latest government report on the number of fires last year found an “exceptional increase” in outdoor blazes that “can be linked to the hot, dry summer”. In July 2022, there were 21,246 outdoor fires – nearly trebling the previous July’s figure.
Wildfires included a number on the “urban-rural interface”, where the countryside meets homes, the report said.
It has also been estimated that, on and around 19 July 2022, around 95 buildings were destroyed including 16 homes in Wennington, in the London borough of Havering.
A major incident review released this July, after a Freedom of Information request by the BBC, found firefighter shortages meant 39 fire engines were not available to attend wildfires that burnt across London that day.
The FBU is now calling for a UK-wide wildfire strategy for fire and rescue services that sets national standards.
It said that, at present, there is a “postcode lottery of wildfire response”.
Better recruitment and retention of retained firefighters in rural areas is needed, it added, and greater central government investment in training, crew numbers and PPE – including the introduction of body-worn physiological monitors for firefighters and specialist respiratory protection.
The Home Office said that overall, fire and rescue authorities are receiving £2.6bn during 2023/24 and it was down to each authority how that money was spent.
Every authority also has to have a plan in place which sets out how they intend to respond to foreseeable risks in their area, including wildfires.
A spokeswoman said the department was working closely with both the NFCC and the England and Wales Wildfire Forum, a multi-agency body, to “continue to improve our response to wildfires and reduce their impact”.
The NFCC said it was “extremely proud of the fantastic, professional response of UK firefighters and 999 control staff in tackling wildfires and protecting local communities”.
It said it would continue to ensure all future funding decisions are “fully informed by, and reflect, the current and future risks that fire services face, including the growing effects of climate change and the impact of wildfires, flooding and other events”.
30 September 2023
Published by: https://www.gov.nt.ca
CANADA – Mr. Speaker, today I would like to recognize this year’s historic wildfire season, the challenges faced by so many NWT residents and others across Canada, and the heroic efforts of firefighters and emergency management personnel to protect our communities.
Before the 2023 wildfire season began, weather forecasts predicted an early start to the season and a high risk for many areas in the NWT. We saw record temperatures, very little rain, and severe drought throughout the summer and fall. All of this resulted in extreme fire conditions for most of the season.
Based on the forecasts, the Department of Environment and Climate Change brought on fire crews, air tankers, and helicopters earlier in the season than normal, and added additional resources. Unfortunately, all of our wildfire personnel and aircraft were put to work right away.
We saw our first wildfire of the season on May 4th, almost a month earlier than normal, which was followed by a record number of fires, area burned, and community evacuations because of fire.
The first major fire followed on May 14th, threatening the K’atl’odeeche First Nation and Hay River. By the end of June, four NWT communities had been evacuated given the threat of wildfires, including K’atl’odeeche First Nation, Hay River, Sambaa K’e, and Wekweeti.
In July, residents of Behchoko and people living along parts of Highway No. 3 also had to leave their homes, and by mid-August, the residents of Kakisa, Enterprise, Fort Smith, Yellowknife, N’Dilo, Dettah, the Ingraham Trail, and Jean Marie River had been evacuated. Additionally, Hay River and the Katlodeeche First Nation had to evacuate for a second time this summer.
As of this week, 299 fires have burned over four million hectares across the NWT this season. These fires resulted in 12 community evacuations, displacing more than two-thirds of NWT residents from their homes.
Mr. Speaker, we have heard from some people that wildfires are not managed like they used to be 40 or 50 years ago and that with more initial attack, we would have avoided the worst of this. I want to be clear: we monitored for new fires throughout the season, and responded to every wildfire that was threatening an NWT community.
These fires grew not because of a lack of action or resources, but due to a perfect storm set in motion by nature. With record temperatures and severe droughts in the Dehcho, South Slave, North Slave, and Sahtu regions, we had fires that burned deeper, hotter, and faster.
With the buildup of forest fuels twice what is considered extreme, the forests were primed for explosive fire growth. This, combined with relentless wind events, intense smoke, and proximity to communities, made conditions very difficult for our crews. On the most difficult days, there was no amount of firefighters or aircraft we could have put in front of these fires to stop them.
Mr. Speaker, behind this year’s response are people, people who are our friends and neighbours, making critical decisions and working hard to keep the places we care about safe.
Over the course of the season, more than a thousand wildfire experts and crew members were brought in from across the NWT, Canada, and around the world. Hundreds more structural firefighters helped to protect our communities. Hundreds of armed forces members, workers from communities and private companies joined the effort, and dozens of additional aircraft and heavy equipment also assisted. Crews did an incredible job FireSmarting and building fire breaks that will now serve as long-term protection for many of our communities. Thousands of homes, cabins, camps, and businesses were saved thanks to the help of so many. Everyone who rose to this occasion deserves the deepest gratitude of this House.
Mr. Speaker, as the fire response slows down, we will turn our attention to learning everything we can from this year’s wildfire season. Over the fall and winter, we will conduct after-action reviews of this year’s fires that impacted communities and apply these lessons to our operations as we do every year. Some lessons we can immediately take away include: continuing to invest in wildfire and climate resilience to get ahead of challenging seasons, ensuring we all play a role in FireSmarting, and strengthening coordination between local firefighting forces and wildfire management teams.
Mr. Speaker, I want to close by acknowledging the immense human toll of this season. This has been the most damaging wildfire season the NWT has ever experienced. The community of Enterprise has been devastated. More than two-thirds of all NWT residents were separated from their communities for weeks. Some people lost their homes and cabins, and others had their businesses or livelihoods impacted by wildfires.
We also lost a firefighter when Fort Liard’s Adam Yeadon tragically passed away while protecting his community earlier this summer. My thoughts remain with his family, his friends, and his colleagues.
To everyone who was impacted by this year’s wildfire season, our government gives not only our heartfelt thoughts, but our commitment to help you as we work to rebuild.
Thank you, Mr. Speaker.
30 September 2023
Published by: https://www.morningagclips.com
FORT COLLINS, Colo. — A new analysis from the Colorado State Forest Service shows that just under half of Colorado’s population, about 2.5 million people, lives in the wildland-urban interface. Of these residents, more than 1 million live in areas with moderate to very high risk of wildfire.
“The Colorado Wildfire Risk Assessment is a nation-leading analysis that gives us important information as Colorado and other Western states face the reality of a year-long wildfire season,” said Governor Polis. “This update is a reminder for everyone to keep up with wildfire mitigation efforts to help keep your homes and communities safe.”
This analysis considers the wildland-urban interface (WUI) as the area where human development (roads, buildings and neighborhoods) is built close to, or within, natural terrain and flammable vegetation and is at risk of wildfire. New data reveal that the WUI in Colorado consists of about 4.5 million acres, or about 45 times the size of the City of Denver, and contains more than 1 million buildings.
“This new analysis demonstrates that wildfire continues to pose a serious risk to large numbers of Coloradans who live or own businesses in the wildland-urban interface. Empowering these residents to reduce this risk is crucial with a warming climate and periods of drought raising the potential for a large, destructive wildfire at any time,” said Matt McCombs, CSFS director and state forester. “Understanding wildfire risk is an important first step to taking action, and we encourage communities, planners and people who live in the WUI to use this best-in-class model to help them prepare for wildfire.”
This summer, the CSFS released an update to the Colorado Wildfire Risk Assessment (CO-WRA), which provides critical data and analysis about potential impacts of wildfire specific to Colorado.
“Wildfire has had a devastating impact on Coloradans and our communities and we all know that we are one lighting strike or one unattended campfire away from our next megafire in Colorado. Our only choice is to be prepared for this inevitability through fuels reduction, education and outreach, and planning,” said Dan Gibbs, Colorado Department of Natural Resources executive director. “I applaud the work of the Colorado State Forest Service in developing the Colorado Wildfire Risk Assessment. It is an important tool for wildfire prevention professionals and homeowners to determine community and personal wildfire risk and encourage Coloradans to take known effective measures to reduce that risk in the face of future wildfires.”
Using data collected at the end of 2022, the updated version of CO-WRA, first released in 2012, helps community leaders, planners and interested residents understand their risk of wildfire. This is the first major update since 2018; moving forward, the data will be updated every three years. The online mapping tool is part of the Colorado Forest Atlas, and it demonstrates where forest management actions can achieve the greatest impact to reduce wildfire risk.
“The Colorado Wildfire Risk Assessment is a detailed, data-driven model that depicts available vegetative fuels, potential fire behavior and risk throughout Colorado, in grasslands and forestlands, as well as both urban and rural areas,” said Amanda West Fordham, Ph.D., CSFS associate director, Science and Data Division. “This robust tool can inform community wildfire protection plans to better prepare Coloradans for the dangers of an uncharacteristic wildfire.”
The CO-WRA analysis focuses on the neighborhood to community level, and it does not include data about individual building materials or fires spread from structure to structure. Staff in the Science and Data Division of the CSFS worked with contractor Technosylva to add innovative data analysis to gain as clear and accurate a picture as possible of the conditions across Colorado specific to the state.
“The 2022 CO-WRA update represents an important step forward in terms of characterizing fire behavior and risk across the state to improve mitigating the negative consequences of wildfires. Technosylva has improved the resolution of outputs (20 meters) and used the latest technological and science advances to assess fire risk. It’s worthy to highlight that all the LiDAR available in Colorado was processed to derive continuous surface and crown fuel types. Also, custom fuels were used to better characterize the fire behavior in both WUI and timber areas after proving the low performance of other fuel families in the aforementioned fuel types. Finally, this project provides unprecedented insights and characterization of the building’s defensible space and probability of building loss in case a fire reaches it,” said Adrián Cardil Forradellas, Ph.D., senior researcher, Technosylva.
Learn more about the Colorado Wildfire Risk Assessment and explore the latest data with easy-to-use, interactive maps at coloradforestatlas.org.
Colorado residents can check their own wildfire risk and learn low-cost, practical ways to protect people, pets and property at LiveWildfireReady.org.
29 September 2023
Published by: https://www.abc.net.au
AUSTRALIA – Australia’s new $11 million fire warning system is exaggerating the risks, alarming communities, and undermining public confidence, an ABC investigation has found.
The Australian Fire Danger Rating System (AFDRS) mistakenly warned Queensland’s Fire and Emergency Services (QFES) earlier this month that a large swathe of southern Queensland was facing catastrophic conditions – when it was not.
QFES staff scrambled to adjust the system at midnight before the day of the so-called “catastrophic” fire category in a bid to downgrade the rating that had been applied across the Darling Downs and Granite Belt.
The incorrect classification of “catastrophic” — which calls for residents in a fire area to evacuate, and warns of a high probability of loss of life and property — stood for at least 16 hours before being downgraded.
Introduced in September last year, the AFDRS was supposed to use the latest science, including detailed vegetation data maps and fire prediction models, to more accurately gauge bushfire behaviour.
But the ABC has confirmed the system has been generating misleading ratings, because it requires detailed data about vegetation that is often unavailable.
Under the previous system, fire department staff were only required to choose between two types of vegetation.
But the AFDRS calls for officers to choose from eight different fuel types and consider moisture content.
Problems were flagged earlier this year interstate when a West Australian government fire officer briefed a Perth council about “teething” issues with the way types of vegetation were scored in the system.
Mundaring Shire Council’s June minutes recorded the briefing and noted that “public confidence in the system has faded as a result”.
The National Council for Fire and Emergency Services in Australia and New Zealand (AFAC), which oversaw the system’s development and implementation, this week admitted there were “some improvements to inputs needed”.
But AFAC said the system was a fundamentally safer option that was being fine-tuned and “places us in a much better position than retaining the widely-criticised system of the past”.
The system’s operations have been criticised by a former Queensland government fire behaviour expert, who has described it as not fit for purpose and called for the original ratings system to be reinstated while the AFDRS is fine-tuned.
“We don’t have the quality of inputs that we need to get really confident fire danger ratings out of the new system,” says fire behaviour expert Andrew Sturgess, who founded and ran Queensland’s Fire Service’s predictive services unit until late 2019.
“The new system, it requires a whole pile of new data relating to things like the height of the fuel and the load on the ground.
“To be trying to make a decision about the conditions at midnight the day before, means the system is not fit for purpose.”
Mr Sturgess said the system was especially struggling with fire danger ratings in pine plantations and in spinifex areas.
“[It requires] a high level of detail about the pine plantations, such as the age of the trees, but this data was not available,” he said.
Mr Sturgess, who is now working as an independent fire mitigation and behaviour consultant, said presenting an incorrect outlook of a catastrophic fire season could undermine public confidence.
He said the forecast in early September of catastrophic fire danger for southern Queensland was “a gross over-prediction”.
“It’s a huge problem because we need people to understand what that means.”
He also noted the recent decision in New South Wales, where a catastrophic fire danger rating for a large region of the state’s far south coast led to the closure of 20 schools.
Mr Sturgess said conditions were bad, but would not have been classified at the highest level under the old system.
NSW Rural Fire Service has rejected the claim, with a spokesperson saying the inputs for the far south coast were confirmed with the local district ahead of the forecast weather last week.
The catastrophic classification in southern Queensland on September 4 triggered unease among the affected councils.
Goondiwindi Regional Council mayor Lawrence Springborg said a “higher level of explanation” was needed about how the system worked.
He said he had been fielding calls from media from around Australia about the catastrophic rating as rain fell on his roof.
“When we got this catastrophic forest fire risk, that raised a lot of concerns for a whole range of people,” Cr Springborg said.
“This is something we will be pursuing with the authorities to so we can get a better understanding and explanation, and also encourage them to make sure that the community have got some awareness.
“Otherwise, the community might not take it seriously.”
Western Downs Regional Council mayor Paul McVeigh said catastrophic conditions can trigger “quite a bit of effort”.
“We have to have people leave their residence and they have to have somewhere to go like evacuation centres,” he said.
Asked about what is being done to correct the problem, QFES said it was updating vegetation maps and reviewing the system’s baseline.
“In addition, in coming weeks QFES is conducting a workshop alongside industry experts to review the AFDRS baseline and overall vegetation classification inputs, to ensure the data going into the system is of the highest standard and is providing accurate fire danger forecasting across Queensland,” a spokesperson said.
“As a partner in the development of the AFDRS, QFES was aware that the size of Queensland had the potential to generate data challenges.”
The spokesperson said there had been a review of the September 4 incident and the issue that led to the “over-forecasting” had been resolved.
An AFAC spokesperson said the “scale of change” in moving to the new system “cannot be underestimated”.
“Community confidence in the system is vital and ongoing refinements to the system will ensure more accurate and timely fire risk information to the public,” the spokesperson said.
“Where issues with the AFDRS are identified, they are investigated, and where necessary, improvements are made.”
The National Emergency Management Agency (NEMA) said the new system was implemented so that “no matter where in Australia someone is, they understand the fire risk and what action they need to take”.
“The Australian government has supported its national implementation at the request of states and territories, and in response to recommendations from the Royal Commission into National Natural Disaster Arrangements,” a NEMA spokesperson said.
“We understand that QFES has conducted a review into the incident and resolved the matter.
“QFES continues to work closely with AFAC and other jurisdictions in the ongoing refinement and enhancement of the AFDRS.”
The AFDRS system cost $11.6 million, with extra funding made available to support local implementation, including a national education campaign, the spokesperson said.
The overhaul of the old fire rating system was recommended by the Royal Commission into National Natural Disaster Arrangements in 2020.
The old system featured six different fire rating levels and predicted fire behaviour based on two types of vegetation – forest and grass.
Federal Emergency Management Minister Murray Watt acknowledged issues with the AFDRS on ABC Radio Perth this morning, but said it was a significant improvement on existing technology.
“It’s far more accurate, far more reliable than the system we had previously. I’m not going to say it’s 100 per cent perfect, and as I say, we’ll keep refining it.
“We do need to keep refining it. I don’t think we’re at a point where we’ve seen a massive loss of public confidence.”
The new AFDRS uses four fire rating levels — moderate, high, extreme, and catastrophic — and predicts fire behaviour by considering at least eight vegetation types, ranging from grassy woodland and pine to spinifex and button grass.
A fire behaviour index that ranges from one through to 100 is associated with the four fire ratings.
A federal government 2022 schedule estimated the eventual cost of implementing the system would be $36 million.
29 September 2023
Published by: https://www.theguardian.com
Preserving the world’s largest tropical forest poses an immense challenge for the governments of Latin America. This task is exacerbated by the inefficiency of public policies and the escalating land conflicts that plague various Brazilian biomes.
In response to these threats, Indigenous peoples have taken matters into their own hands, rallying to oversee and protect their territories.
Independent self-defence groups are cropping up in Amazonian communities across the region, taking on the role of preserving vast areas that should be under the state’s protection.
These Indigenous communities feel they are ultimately responsible for safeguarding the forest.
In collaboration with a federal agency, the Brazilian Institute of the Environment and Renewable Natural Resources (Ibama), the Paiter Suruí community in Rondônia state established the country’s third Indigenous brigade to tackle blazes during the fire season, which typically lasts from July to November.
Rondônia state once had 208,000 sq km of forest (51.4m acres), an area nearly the size of Romania, but over the past three decades has lost an estimated 68,000 sq km of rainforest.
Scientists predict that this year’s season of forest fires – and arson – will be even more intense due to the El Niño weather cycle, the sporadic climate pattern that increases global temperatures every three to seven years. So far, the number of hotspots in 2023 has already exceeded that of last year.
The brigade has attracted dozens of Paiter Suruí committed to preventing blazes and firefighting within the Sete de Setembro Indigenous territory, located around Cacoal.
As part of the selection process, candidates undergo assessments of their physical fitness and skills during the initial training. A week later, they take part in an intensive week of practical and theoretical brigade instruction.
The training covers safety protocols, fire management strategies, training in how to use equipment and tools, understanding how blazes can develop, and specific techniques for combating forest fires.
Indigenous communities are increasingly using technology in their efforts to protect their ancestral lands in the Amazon. The integration of satellite images on the internet is poised to revolutionise the brigade’s work, giving a huge boost to the Paiter Suruí people in their fight against forest fires.
I am in close contact with the Lakapoy Collective, a group of Indigenous photographers who include Ubiratan Suruí, the young activist Txai Suruí, and Gabriel Uchida, representatives of the Paiter Suruí people.
After securing legal recognition of their Indigenous territory, these dynamic people have undergone comprehensive training in using technology to document their cultural narratives. Their mission is clear: to strengthen the Paiter Suruí heritage.
Paiter Suruí long ago embarked on sustainable development through tourism in their village, where they produce coffee and chestnuts (what are known as Brazilnuts in the west). They are now directly involved in reforestation initiatives, monitoring the biome, and surveillance of their territory, as well as organising the fire brigade. This collective effort underscores their dedication to fostering sustainable practices.
“We previously operated an informal Indigenous brigade. Now we have trained our members, equipping them to protect our territory, especially during wildfire seasons,” says Ubiratan Suruí.
“Their primary responsibilities include combating fires along our territorial boundaries and managing controlled burns in the traditional fields of our Indigenous communities.”
In the past few decades, the degradation of Brazil’s ecosystems has been steadily worsening. The problem escalated during the tenure of two former presidents, the conservative Michel Temer and the far-right Jair Bolsonaro.
A study in the journal Nature led by Luciana Gatti, a senior researcher at the Brazilian Institute for Space Research (Inpe), highlights the devastating consequences of the “relaxation” of environmental regulations under the far-right administration of the former president Jair Bolsonaro, showing how the south-east Amazon, in particular, has become a net source of carbon to the atmosphere.
A Guardian investigation found that fires were three times more common in beef-farming areas of the Amazon.
Environmental experts and a few political leaders acknowledge the imperative to create job opportunities and increase income levels in the Amazon region, home to more than 28 million Brazilians.
Involving local communities in preservation is a crucial strategy to reduce the economic allure of deforestation, cattle ranching and other large-scale agriculture, which often lead to environmental degradation under the banner of economic development and wealth accumulation.
The Paiter Suruí and other Indigenous firefighting brigades are just one way in which these communities are taking steps to secure their future.
29 September 2023
Published by: https://www.cbc.ca
CANADA – When Claire Cameron planted black spruce trees in the 1990s, she thought she was saving the planet.
But as wildfires ravaged parts of Canada this past summer, she wonders how many of those saplings contributed to the smoke in the sky.
“I’d recently read a book by John Vaillant named Fire Weather and in it, it talks about how flammable black spruce are,” said the novellist and essayist.
“I had this moment where I could picture myself with my hand on a black spruce, flicking the roots of the sapling in and planting it, and I realized that this was more sort of like a blowtorch,” she told The Current guest host Nora Young.
Canada has lost more trees to wildfires this year than in any other year on record. More than 17 million hectares have gone up in smoke across the country this year — more than two times the previous record of 7.6 million hectares in 1989.
Nearly 6,500 wildfires have burned across Canada in 2023, from the northern tips of the territories to the heavily-forested areas of British Columbia.
“With climate change, we’re seeing so much drought and the heat, but a lot of trees … just don’t survive,” said Meghan DeGraff, a supervisor for All Star Silviculture in Enderby, B.C.
“So you’re having to go back year after year and keep planting the same areas over and over,” the veteran tree planter said.
Ontario alone has had to deal with 725 wildfires this year. Although she can’t tie her actions directly to today’s fires, Cameron knows a few wildfires burned in places near Hearst, Ont., where she used to plant.
“I had such a close relationship with each black spruce there,” she said. “I was alone all day, so I talked to them and I thought about each one.”
“I was quite proud of that, so it was hard to think that I might have contributed to that smoke in the sky.”
As a tree planter, Cameron said she was on a contract where she exclusively planted black spruce trees.
She said she would work 11-hour shifts, six days a week, and she would plant close to 4,000 trees a day at her peak.
“Going into tree planting, I certainly thought, you know, you take one tree out, you put one tree in,” she said. “Since then, my reading and realization is that it’s so much more about a forest.”
“It’s a very complicated ecosystem and an organism almost, and not something you can just readily replace by putting one young tree in.”
John Innes, the Forest Renewal B.C. chair in forest management, lays some of the blame on timber production. He said a lot of tree planting is done with the goal of achieving a grand, fully stocked stand of trees that are useful for the forest industry.
“Unfortunately, that is absolutely what fires love,” said the University of British Columbia professor. “So the fires have been ripping through these stands and we’ve got a serious problem as a result.”
Innes said more strategic planting of mixed vegetation is needed in order to prevent serious wildfires from spreading, such as working broad-leaved trees like birch into the mix.
“Broad leaves are of very little interest to the forest industry, but they don’t burn so severely as conifers, and so they are very valuable as fuel reduction breaks in the landscape,” he said.
DeGraff, who has been planting trees for 13 years, said she’s noticed a shift in parts of B.C., away from planting a single species of trees.
“We are starting to move in a direction where we are planting more species,” she said. “Even this last season, I remember days where I was planting five, six different species in the same day or the same contract, which is fantastic.”
DeGraff said they’re also transitioning away from planting a large amount of trees in a small area. According to Innes, by making the forests less dense, it’s less likely for wildfires to spread through the crowds.
“We tend to do a lot of these sorts of things in what’s known as the wildland–urban interface, which is the area immediately around [towns],” he said. “We’re trying to protect towns. We don’t do it across the whole of the landscape because it’s very expensive.”
“But if we were to start off with the clever planting of the right species in the right place, we could actually then work with fire to make our landscapes more resilient.”
When you’re enveloped in smoke, it kind of concentrates your mind, and I think we will see some changes occurring.-John Innes, the Forest Renewal B.C. chair in forest managementnone
Cameron said she’s encouraged by what she’s hearing from DeGraff because it’s these structural changes that will make a difference.
“I think, perhaps, what we’re both getting at is removing this idea that just planting a tree is inherently good,” she said. “I think we’d both question that, it has to be done in partnership with the local community, it has to be done taking the landscape into consideration.”
That’s not to say that people should stop planting trees, though.
“I don’t think it’s something we can stop,” she said. “We can’t afford to put down tools just because we’re up against something hard.”
“We need changes on the structural level and we need to be having conversations about how to do this sustainably — and at the same time, we need to address our consumption as well.”
Innes said he wasn’t initially hopeful of these changes being made. But he believes this fire season has been a “wake up call” for politicians and forest managers.
“I think a lot of politicians and farm managers … [are] realizing that there is a serious problem,” he said. “When you’re enveloped in smoke, it kind of concentrates your mind, and I think we will see some changes occurring.”
29 September 2023
Published by: https://www.montanarightnow.com
USA – BOZEMAN, MONT. — Autumn is here in Bozeman, and as dry leaves start falling to the ground, it’s important to be ready in the event of a fire.
This year, Gallatin County Emergency Management started a wildfire mitigation program.
Their staff will assess properties that are in the Wildland Urban Interface and help homeowners come up with solutions that will help protect their homes from wildfires. They help homeowners decide what vegetation they should remove or thin out to slow the spread of a potential wildfire.
The program even has money to help pay for 60 % any projects the homeowners might need to do, like hire a contractor to thin out trees, for example.
It was just two years ago in September that the Bridger foothills fire started on the west side of the bridges and headed up the canyon towards the Bridger bowl area. Disasters like that serve as a good reminder that never too late to be prepared.
“The program is important for residents to protect their property. I mean, that’s the bottom line. You know, the more they do on the front end to protect their house from impacts of wildfire, the better chances they have of their property surviving,” said Jay Pape, Preparedness & Mitigation Manager.
© Global Fire Monitoring Center (GFMC) / Fire Ecology Research Group
All materials produced by GFMC or IFFN must be quoted properly. Copyrights of materials provided by other organizations or publications and websites hyperlinked with this website must be observed. It is not permitted to publish or otherwise use photographs produced by the GFMC and other providers without a written permission.
